Fouling behaviour, regeneration options and on-line control of biomass-based power plant effluents using microporous ceramic membranes

The work presents an on-line filtration treatment for biomass-based power plant effluents using microporous ceramic symmetric membranes with an emphasis on establishment of fouling mechanisms and regeneration options in the process. The work also establishes the relationships among the membrane filterability, quality of permeate and flux to that of the pore size of ceramic membranes. For these purposes, two types of ceramic membrane configurations, i.e., seven-channeled and single-channeled (hollow type) tubes with identical pore size of 1.2 μm were selected for the experiments. On the other hand, raw effluents generated by the power plant were first pre-filtered using a 0.5 mm sieve and the resultant filtrate was further used for the present microfiltration trials by varying transmembrane pressure (TMP). Differences in the filterability of the effluents by the two membrane configurations at variable levels of TMP were explained using various membrane-fouling models. The filtration resistances that are acting in series were calculated using Darcy's and Poiseuille's law. Establishment of fouling mechanism/s of the membranes and its regeneration by adopting chemical cleaning and backflushing techniques were also an integral part of the study. The results suggest that microfiltration of effluents in a continuous crossflow mode with backflushing in regular intervals offer great advantage over efficiency and effectiveness in monitoring the contaminants in the raw effluents by physical methods. The study hence finds an on-line filtration solution in monitoring biomass-based power plant effluents in a benign way using microporous ceramic membranes.

[1]  I. W. Cumming,et al.  Modelling of dead-end microfiltration with pore blocking and cake formation , 2002 .

[2]  Walter Lorch,et al.  Handbook of water purification , 1981 .

[3]  R. Kim,et al.  Filtration performance of ceramic membrane for the recovery of volatile fatty acids from liquid organic sludge , 2005 .

[4]  A. Zydney,et al.  A Combined Pore Blockage and Cake Filtration Model for Protein Fouling during Microfiltration. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[5]  Chris Buckley,et al.  Cake Formation in Cross-Flow Microfiltration Systems , 1992 .

[6]  A. F. van Nieuwenhuijzen,et al.  Direct ultrafiltration of municipal wastewater: comparison between filtration of raw sewage and primary clarifier effluent , 2005 .

[7]  A. Bottino,et al.  Water treatment for drinking purpose: ceramic microfiltration application , 2001 .

[8]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Analysis of humic acid fouling during microfiltration using a pore blockage-cake filtration model , 2002 .

[9]  Che-Jen Lin,et al.  Effect of operating parameters on permeate flux decline caused by cake formation a model study , 2005 .

[10]  A. Zydney,et al.  Hydraulic permeability of protein layers deposited during ultrafiltration , 1991 .

[11]  Esteban Alonso,et al.  On the feasibility of urban wastewater tertiary treatment by membranes: a comparative assessment , 2001 .

[12]  Kyung-Guen Song,et al.  Treatment of domestic wastewater using microfiltration for reuse of wastewater , 1999 .

[13]  Vassilis Gekas,et al.  Microfiltration membranes, cross-flow transport mechanisms and fouling studies , 1990 .

[14]  W. Koros,et al.  Terminology for membranes and membrane processes (IUPAC Recommendations 1996) , 1996 .

[15]  F. Ahmadun,et al.  Performance of flexible membrane using kaolin dynamic membrane in treating domestic wastewater , 2002 .

[16]  J. Hermia,et al.  Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws - Application To Power-law Non-newtonian Fluids , 1982 .

[17]  A. Fane,et al.  Ultrafiltration of Colloidal Silver Particles: Flux, Rejection, and Fouling , 1993 .

[18]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Terminology for membranes and membrane processes (IUPAC Recommendations 1996) , 1996 .

[19]  A. Zydney,et al.  Protein fouling of asymmetric and composite microfiltration membranes , 2001 .

[20]  Chau‐Jen Lee,et al.  Clarification of viscous poly tetramethylene ether glycol (PTMEG) containing solid suspension by dead‐end flow microfiltration under constant pressure , 1999 .

[21]  Kyu-Hong Ahn,et al.  Application of tubular ceramic membranes for reuse of wastewater from buildings , 1998 .

[22]  Galip Akay,et al.  Crossflow microfiltration of low concentration-nonliving yeast suspensions , 2004 .

[23]  John Dodds,et al.  Filtration of low concentrations of latex particles on membrane filters , 1985 .

[24]  A. Zydney,et al.  Transmembrane pressure profiles during constant flux microfiltration of bovine serum albumin , 2002 .

[25]  S. M. Kumar,et al.  Filtration characteristics in dead-end microfiltration of living Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells by alumina membranes , 2008 .

[26]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[27]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Theoretical descriptions of membrane filtration of colloids and fine particles: An assessment and review , 1995 .

[28]  William J. Koros,et al.  TERMINOLOGY FOR MEMBRANES AND MEMBRANE PROCESSES , 1996 .

[29]  S. Judd,et al.  Bacterial rejection in crossflow microfiltration of sewage , 2000 .