Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action

We quantified the accuracy of the perception of the absolute direction of motion-in-depth (MID) of a simulated approaching object using a perceptual task and compared those data with the accuracy of estimating the passing distance measured by means of a simulated catching task. For the simulated catching task, movements of the index finger and thumb of the observer's hand were tracked as participants tried to "catch" the simulated approaching object. A sensation of MID was created by providing monocular and/or binocular retinal image information. Visual stimuli were identical for perceptual and simulated catching tasks. We confirm previous reports that in the perceptual task, observers judged the object to pass wider of the head than indicated by the visual information provided. Although accuracy improved when auditory feedback was added to the perceptual (button pressing) task, consistent overestimates were still recorded. For the no-feedback simulated catching task, observers consistently overreached, i.e., the hand was further away from the midline than the simulated object at the time of hand closure. When auditory feedback was added to the simulated catching task successful catching was achieved. The relative accuracy in binocular and monocular conditions for individual observers could be partially explained by individual differences in sensitivity to unidirectional changes in angular size and changes in relative disparity. We conclude that catching an approaching ball requires that errors in the perceived direction of MID are corrected by feedback-driven learning in the motor system, and that this learning is more easily achieved for the catching action than for button pressing.

[1]  D. Regan,et al.  Evidence for the existence of neural mechanisms selectively sensitive to the direction of movement in space , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  D. Regan,et al.  Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms? , 1979, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Regan,et al.  Binocular correlates of the direction of motion in depth , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  D Regan,et al.  The relation between discrimination and sensitivity in the perception of motion in depth. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field , 1995, Vision Research.

[7]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  Predictive information and the control of action: What you see is what you get. , 1991 .

[8]  D Regan,et al.  A stereo field map with implications for disparity processing. , 1973, Investigative ophthalmology.

[9]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Accuracy and precision of binocular 3-D motion perception. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D. Regan,et al.  Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision , 2000, Current Biology.

[11]  Rob Gray,et al.  Perceptual Processes Used by Drivers During Overtaking in a Driving Simulator , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[12]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.

[13]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  The impact of spatiotemporal sampling on time-to-contact judgments , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  D Regan,et al.  Some dynamic features of depth perception. , 1973, Vision research.

[15]  D. Regan,et al.  Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object , 2000, Vision Research.

[16]  D Regan,et al.  Risky driving behavior: a consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Rob Gray,et al.  Different strategies for using motion-in-depth information in catching. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  D Regan,et al.  Visual responses to changing size and to sideways motion for different directions of motion in depth: linearization of visual responses. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[19]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Vision and motor control , 1992 .

[20]  Yiannis Aloimonos,et al.  Vision and action , 1995, Image Vis. Comput..

[21]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Human observers are biased in judging the angular approach of a projectile , 2004, Vision Research.

[22]  D Regan,et al.  Adapting to expansion increases perceived time-to-collision , 1999, Vision Research.

[23]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion , 1986, Vision Research.

[25]  D Regan,et al.  Visually guided locomotion: psychophysical evidence for a neural mechanism sensitive to flow patterns. , 1979, Science.

[26]  J. P. Vroom,et al.  Advances in Psychology. , 1998, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[27]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[28]  D. Regan,et al.  Visually guided collision avoidance and collision achievement , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  K. I. Beverley,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth Channels for Position and for Motion , 1978 .

[30]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual fields for frontal plane motion and for changing size , 1983, Vision Research.

[31]  D Regan,et al.  Visual field defects for vergence eye movements and for stereomotion perception. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  Theories of time-to-contact , 2004 .

[33]  C. E. Peper,et al.  Chapter 12 Predictive Visual Information Sources for the Regulation of Action with Special Emphasis on Catching and Hitting , 1992 .

[34]  D. Regan,et al.  Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Movement reversals in ball catching , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  C. William Tyler,et al.  Characteristics of stereomovement suppression , 1975 .

[37]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[38]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Using visual direction in three-dimensional motion perception , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  D Regan,et al.  Visual test results compared with flying performance in telemetry-tracked aircraft. , 1983, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[40]  D. Regan,et al.  Cyclopean Discrimination Thresholds for the Direction and Speed of Motion in Depth , 1996, Vision Research.

[41]  David Regan,et al.  Chapter 9 A step by step approach to research on time-to-contact and time-to-passage , 2004 .

[42]  J. Tresilian,et al.  a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude , 2022 .

[43]  D. Regan,et al.  Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth , 1994, Vision Research.

[44]  A. Williams,et al.  Visual perception and action in sport , 1999 .

[45]  D Regan,et al.  Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information , 1998, Vision Research.

[46]  D Regan,et al.  Visual Judgements and Misjudgements in Cricket, and the Art of Flight , 1992, Perception.

[47]  D Regan,et al.  Discrimination of the direction and speed of motion in depth of a monocularly visible target from binocular information alone. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual field defects for unidirectional and oscillatory motion in depth , 1989, Vision Research.

[49]  M. Cynader,et al.  The visual perception of motion in depth. , 1979, Scientific American.

[50]  D Regan,et al.  Correlations between visual test results and flying performance on the advanced simulator for pilot training (ASPT). , 1981, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[51]  Fred Sir Hoyle,et al.  The Black Cloud , 1957 .

[52]  Robert Gray,et al.  Risky driving behavior: a consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action. , 2000 .