OBJECTIVE
The effect of opposed-phase imaging on the interpretation of MR contrast studies is highlighted.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A model calculation is performed. It demonstrates the change of signal intensity of an average tumor before and after application of Gd-DTPA on an in-phase and an opposed-phase image, depending on the percentage of fat within the voxels. The effect is then demonstrated, using a small cotton stick soaked with water or a solution of contrast agent representing a tumor before and after i.v. application of Gd-DTPA.
RESULTS
If an average enhancing tumor, which is surrounded by fat, occupies less than 50-60% of the slice thickness, it becomes undetectable on opposed-phase images. The reason is that due to signal cancellation on the opposed image, no signal change or even signal decrease results, while signal increase is visible on the in-phase image.
CONCLUSION
In those areas of the body where significant partial volume of a tumor with fat may occur (such as for breast tumors growing along ducts, which are surrounded by fat), severe errors can result. Therefore we explicitly warn from using opposed-image sequences for MR contrast studies.
[1]
A. Roberts,et al.
Pulsed versus conventional thrombolytic infusion techniques.
,
1994,
Radiology.
[2]
Präoperative MR-Mammographie bei bekanntem Mammakarzinom. Sinnvolle Mehrinformation oder sinnloser Mehraufwand?
,
1994
.
[3]
M D Schnall,et al.
MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience.
,
1994,
Radiology.
[4]
C. Moran,et al.
Thymolipoma: analysis of 27 cases.
,
1994,
Radiology.
[5]
M. Proschan,et al.
Coronary artery disease: prediction with in vitro electron beam CT.
,
1994,
Radiology.
[6]
O Lucidarme,et al.
Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging.
,
1994,
Radiology.
[7]
S E Harms,et al.
MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation.
,
1993,
Radiology.