Gender And Public Spending On Education In Pakistan: A Case Study Of Disaggregated Benefit Incidence

To what extent has government education spending in Pakistan been effective in reducing gender gaps in enrollments? To answer this question, this article reviews the benefit incidence of government education spending. It finds that government subsidies directed towards primary education are pro poor in all four provinces of Pakistan. Moreover, females has disadvantage in access to primary education. However, government subsidies directed towards higher education poorly targeted and poorest income group receives less than the riches income group and indeed favor those who are better off. Similarly, the gender disparity in access to public subsidy is higher at tertiary level and lowest at primary level, which also reflects poor targeting. Improving targeting to the poor as well as better female participation involves not simply rearranging the public subsidies, but also addressing the constraints that prevent the poor and females from accessing these services.

[1]  Lionel Demery Poverty.  PUBLIC SOCIAL SPENDING: DISAGGREGATING BENEFIT INCIDENCE , 1996 .

[2]  R. Reinikka,et al.  Do Budgets Really Matter? Evidence from Public Spending on Education and Health in Uganda , 1998 .

[3]  J. Hammer.  Distributional Effects of Social Sector Expenditures in Malaysia, 1974-89. , 1995 .

[4]  D. V. D. Walle,et al.  Public Spending and the Poor , 1997 .

[5]  R. Siddiqui,et al.  Gender differences in demand for schooling. , 2001 .

[6]  M. Selowsky.  Who benefits from government expenditure , 1979 .

[7]  G. Brennan.  The Distributional Implications of Public Goods , 1976 .

[8]  D. V. D. Walle,et al.  The Distribution of Subsidies through Public Health Services in Indonesia, 1978–87 , 1994 .

[9]  L. Crouch.  Public Education Equity and Efficiency in South Africa: Lessons for Other Countries. , 1996 .

[10]  L. Demery.  Benefit incidence : a practitioner's guide , 2000 .

[11]  F. Castro-Leal,et al.  Public social spending in Africa : do the poor benefit? , 1999 .

[12]  Richard D. Raymond,et al.  The Distributional Impact of Public Goods , 1980 .

[13]  D. V. D. Walle.  Assessing the welfare impacts of public spending , 1998 .

[14]  D. V. D. Walle,et al.  Public spending and the poor : theory and evidence , 1995 .

[15]  H. Alderman.  Public Schooling Expenditures in Rural Pakistan: Efficiently Targeting Girls and a Lagging Region. , 1995 .

[16]  J. Meerman.  Public Expenditure in Malaysia: Who Benefits and Why , 1979, The Journal of Asian Studies.