Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data

Significance In many landscapes across the globe, we are witnessing an ongoing functional shift away from landscapes managed for extractive activities (e.g., agriculture, mining, forestry) and toward landscapes managed for recreation and leisure activities. Understanding the spatial configuration of this functional shift at regional and continental scales will be crucial for the development of effective landscape and rural development policies in coming decades. We present a rigorous comparison between three social media platforms’ suitability for mapping and quantifying landscape values. We also introduce a predictive model capable of quantifying landscape values at a continental scale. The utility of the model is illustrated through the identification of specific landscape features that best explain high densities of ascribed value (i.e., landscape value locations). Individuals, communities, and societies ascribe a diverse array of values to landscapes. These values are shaped by the aesthetic, cultural, and recreational benefits and services provided by those landscapes. However, across the globe, processes such as urbanization, agricultural intensification, and abandonment are threatening landscape integrity, altering the personally meaningful connections people have toward specific places. Existing methods used to study landscape values, such as social surveys, are poorly suited to capture dynamic landscape-scale processes across large geographic extents. Social media data, by comparison, can be used to indirectly measure and identify valuable features of landscapes at a regional, continental, and perhaps even worldwide scale. We evaluate the usefulness of different social media platforms—Panoramio, Flickr, and Instagram—and quantify landscape values at a continental scale. We find Panoramio, Flickr, and Instagram data can be used to quantify landscape values, with features of Instagram being especially suitable due to its relatively large population of users and its functional ability of allowing users to attach personally meaningful comments and hashtags to their uploaded images. Although Panoramio, Flickr, and Instagram have different user profiles, our analysis revealed similar patterns of landscape values across Europe across the three platforms. We also found variables describing accessibility, population density, income, mountainous terrain, or proximity to water explained a significant portion of observed variation across data from the different platforms. Social media data can be used to extend our understanding of how and where individuals ascribe value to landscapes across diverse social, political, and ecological boundaries.

[1]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  The Twitter of Babel: Mapping World Languages through Microblogging Platforms , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Digital Earth Crowdsourcing Geographic Information for Disaster Response: a Research Frontier Crowdsourcing Geographic Information for Disaster Response: a Research Frontier , 2022 .

[3]  Greg Brown,et al.  Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation , 2015 .

[4]  R. Costanza,et al.  Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Andrew O. Finley,et al.  spBayes for Large Univariate and Multivariate Point-Referenced Spatio-Temporal Data Models , 2013, 1310.8192.

[6]  C. Raymond,et al.  The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment , 2007 .

[7]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU , 2014 .

[8]  K. Seto,et al.  Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[10]  P. Verburg,et al.  Alternative trajectories of land abandonment: causes, consequences and research challenges , 2013 .

[11]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  G. Fry,et al.  The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Identification of tourist hot spots based on social networks: A comparative analysis of European metropolises using photo-sharing services and GIS , 2015 .

[14]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature , 2009 .

[15]  E. Oteros‐Rozas,et al.  Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level , 2013 .

[16]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs , 2012 .

[17]  Henrikki Tenkanen,et al.  Prospects and challenges for social media data in conservation science , 2015, Front. Environ. Sci..

[18]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[19]  M. Tveit Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Roger Bivand,et al.  Comparing Implementations of Estimation Methods for Spatial Econometrics , 2015 .

[21]  A. Guerry,et al.  Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[22]  A. Crowe,et al.  Trialling a method to quantify the ‘cultural services’ of the English landscape using Countryside Survey data , 2012 .

[23]  Daniel A Griffith,et al.  Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses. , 2006, Ecology.

[24]  Louise Willemen,et al.  Editorial: Best practices for mapping ecosystem services , 2015 .

[25]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services , 2015 .

[26]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  Social Networking Sites: Their Users and Social Implications - A Longitudinal Study , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  A. Cottam,et al.  Using Social Media to Measure the Contribution of Red List Species to the Nature-Based Tourism Potential of African Protected Areas , 2015, PloS one.

[28]  D. Munroe,et al.  Spatial analysis of land suitability, hot-tub cabins and forest tourism in Appalachian Ohio , 2014 .

[29]  Richard Inger,et al.  Spatial Covariance between Aesthetic Value & Other Ecosystem Services , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Uncertainties in Ecosystem Service Maps: A Comparison on the European Scale , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[32]  M. Arriaza,et al.  Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes , 2004 .

[33]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: a meta-analysis of case studies , 2014 .

[34]  D. Ruths,et al.  Social media for large studies of behavior , 2014, Science.

[35]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The Geospatial Characteristics of a Social Movement Communication Network , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  Guy Garrod,et al.  Valuing landscape: a contingent valuation approach , 1993 .

[37]  Bertrand De Longueville,et al.  "OMG, from here, I can see the flames!": a use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires , 2009, LBSN '09.

[38]  A. Tatem,et al.  Dynamic population mapping using mobile phone data , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Sensitising rural policy: Assessing spatial variation in rural development options for Europe , 2011 .

[40]  Alexander Dunkel,et al.  Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata , 2015 .