Surrogate-assisted evolutionary multiobjective shape optimization of an air intake ventilation system

We tackle three different challenges in solving a real-world industrial problem: formulating the optimization problem, connecting different simulation tools and dealing with computationally expensive objective functions. The problem to be optimized is an air intake ventilation system of a tractor and consists of three computationally expensive objective functions. We describe the modeling of the system and its numerical evaluation with a commercial software. To obtain solutions in few function evaluations, a recently proposed surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithm K-RVEA is applied. The diameters of four different outlets of the ventilation system are considered as decision variables. From the set of nondominated solutions generated by K-RVEA, a decision maker having substance knowledge selected the final one based on his preferences. The final selected solution has better objective function values compared to the baseline solution of the initial design. A comparison of solutions with K-RVEA and RVEA (which does not use surrogates) is also performed to show the potential of using surrogates.

[1]  Yaochu Jin,et al.  A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation , 2005, Soft Comput..

[2]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[3]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  A Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[4]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  A Surrogate-Assisted Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Computationally Expensive Many-Objective Optimization , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  Dirk Thierens,et al.  The balance between proximity and diversity in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[6]  T. N. Stevenson,et al.  Fluid Mechanics , 2021, Nature.

[7]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[8]  Wolfgang Ponweiser,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization on a Limited Budget of Evaluations Using Model-Assisted -Metric Selection , 2008, PPSN.

[9]  Joshua D. Knowles,et al.  ParEGO: a hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[10]  Shigeru Obayashi,et al.  Optimization of Combustion Chamber for Diesel Engine Using Kriging Model , 2006 .

[11]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  Expensive Multiobjective Optimization by MOEA/D With Gaussian Process Model , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[13]  Yaochu Jin,et al.  Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: Recent advances and future challenges , 2011, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[14]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[15]  Michael Emmerich,et al.  Metamodel Assisted Multiobjective Optimisation Strategies and their Application in Airfoil Design , 2004 .

[16]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  A survey on handling computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems with evolutionary algorithms , 2017, Soft Computing.