Perceptual evaluation of speckle noise reduction techniques for phase shifting holograms

The perceived image quality of a digital hologram of macroscopic objects is affected by its reduced depth of focus and by speckle noise due to coherent illumination. Several filtering techniques have been proposed for speckle noise reduction of digital holograms but there are scarce quality assessment studies regarding phase-shifting digital holograms. Typically, the performance of these filters on experimental holograms is assessed using no reference objective metrics. However, these metrics do not reflect the subjective visual quality perceived by a human observer. In this work, the performance of four speckle reduction algorithms, namely the non-local means, the Lee, the Frost and the block matching 3D filters, using five different parametrizations for each case, are subjectively compared. Due to a large amount of testing data, the subjective test was divided in two: 1) one phase where the effects of the parametrization of each method are evaluated, 2) a second phase where the best parametrization results are compared between them. The results are ranked with respect to the perceived image quality to obtain the Mean Opinion Scores for each filter/parameter combination. As in this case there is no reference image and double stimulus is desirable, the subjective evaluation was achieved using full paired comparison. The experiment indicates that BM3D and Lee are the preferred filters, and reveals a strong dependence of filter performance on hologram characteristics.

[1]  Pascal Picart,et al.  Quantitative appraisal for noise reduction in digital holographic phase imaging. , 2016, Optics express.

[2]  Colas Schretter,et al.  Subjective quality assessment of numerically reconstructed compressed holograms , 2015, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[3]  J. Goodman Speckle Phenomena in Optics: Theory and Applications , 2020 .

[4]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Image denoising with block-matching and 3D filtering , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  António Pinheiro,et al.  Comparative analysis of autofocus functions in digital in-line phase-shifting holography. , 2016, Applied optics.

[6]  Thomas J. Naughton,et al.  Towards Perception-Inspired Numerical Measures of Compression Error in Digital Holograms of Natural Three-Dimensional Scenes , 2018 .

[7]  Thomas J. Naughton,et al.  Evaluation of perceived quality attributes of digital holograms viewed with a stereoscopic display , 2010, 2010 9th Euro-American Workshop on Information Optics.

[8]  Maya R. Gupta,et al.  How to Analyze Paired Comparison Data , 2011 .

[9]  Pascal Picart,et al.  Evaluation of De-Noising Algorithms for Amplitude Image Restoration in Digital Holography , 2018 .

[10]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Manuela Pereira,et al.  Holographic representation: Hologram plane vs. object plane , 2018, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[12]  Pasquale Memmolo,et al.  Quantitative phase maps denoising of long holographic sequences by using SPADEDH algorithm. , 2013, Applied optics.

[13]  Thomas J. Naughton,et al.  Visual perception of digital holograms on autostereoscopic displays , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[14]  Thomas J. Naughton,et al.  Comparing numerical error and visual quality in reconstructions from compressed digital holograms , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  The curvelet transform for image denoising , 2001, Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205).

[16]  Qian Kemao,et al.  Windowed Fourier transform for fringe pattern analysis. , 2004, Applied optics.

[17]  Jonathan Maycock,et al.  A comparison of wavelet analysis techniques in digital holograms , 2008, SPIE Photonics Europe.

[18]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of Local Statistics , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Pascal Picart,et al.  Strategies for reducing speckle noise in digital holography , 2018, Light: Science & Applications.

[20]  Thomas J. Naughton,et al.  Visually lossless compression of digital hologram sequences , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[21]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  Adrian Stern,et al.  Speckle denoising in digital holography by nonlocal means filtering. , 2013, Applied optics.

[23]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A non-local algorithm for image denoising , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[24]  Rajeev Srivastava,et al.  Comparison of PDE based and other techniques for speckle reduction from digitally reconstructed holographic images , 2010 .

[25]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[26]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[28]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons , 1952 .