This chapter discusses an approach that involves the construction of an AND/OR graph (a role structure) that is specific to some given problem. This contrasts with the earlier approach of interpreting a database and its schema as a global role structure, from which a specific role structure(s) can be extracted for a given problem. The chapter describes the dynamic approach conceptually, as involving the grafting of fragments of modeling knowledge. Each fragment is specified in terms of the AND/OR graph terminology and the organizational role framework. This approach has some similarities with aspects of the STRIPS and BDL systems. The chapter also explains the way by which the grafting of AND/OR fragments into an AND/OR tree can be operationalized in terms of first-order predicate logic and the resolution principle. Flexible report generation can be provided by a subpool of report generation modules that is subject to facile updating. The chapter presents the skeleton of a methodology for automatic model formulation and utilization.
[1]
Alfred Horn,et al.
On sentences which are true of direct unions of algebras
,
1951,
Journal of Symbolic Logic.
[2]
Gerald M. Hoffman.
The Contribution of Management Science to Management Information
,
1978
.
[3]
T. Naylor,et al.
A Survey of Users of Corporate Planning Models
,
1976
.
[4]
C. Cordell Green,et al.
Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving
,
1969,
IJCAI.
[5]
Franz Edelman.
They Went Thataway
,
1977
.
[6]
Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.
Production Rules as a Representation for a Knowledge-Based Consultation Program
,
1977,
Artif. Intell..
[7]
Andrew Vazsonyi.
Information Systems in Management Science
,
1973
.
[8]
Ronald A. Seaberg,et al.
Computer Based Decision Systems in Xerox Corporate Planning
,
1973
.