Occupational exposure assessment for crystalline silica dust: approach in Poland and worldwide.

Crystalline silica is a health hazard commonly encountered in work environment. Occupational exposure to crystalline silica dust concerns workers employed in such industries as mineral, fuel-energy, metal, chemical and construction industry. It is estimated that over 2 million workers in the European Union are exposed to crystalline silica. In Poland, over 50 thousand people work under conditions of silica dust exposure exceeding the occupational exposure limit. The assessment of occupational exposure to crystalline silica is a multi-phase process, primarily dependent on workplace measurements, quantitative analyses of samples, and comparison of results with respective standards. The present article summarizes the approaches to and methods used for assessment of exposure to crystalline silica as adopted in different countries in the EU and worldwide. It also compares the occupational limit values in force in almost 40 countries. Further, it points out the consequences resulting from the fact that IARC has regarded the two most common forms of crystalline silica: quartz and cristobalite as human carcinogens. The article includes an inter-country review of the methods used for air sample collection, dust concentration measurements, and determination of crystalline silica. The selection was based on the GESTIS database which lists the methods approved by the European Union for the measurements and tests regarding hazardous agents. Special attention has been paid to the methods of determining crystalline silica. The author attempts to analyze the influence of analytical techniques, sample preparation and the reference materials on determination results. Also the operating parameters of the method, including limit of detection, limit of quantification, and precision, have been compared.

[1]  R. Song,et al.  Proficiency Analytical Testing (PAT) Silica Variability, 1990–1998 , 1999 .

[2]  Lei Er,et al.  THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUES FOR 1963 ADOPTED AT THE 25TH ANNUAL MEETING OF AMERICAN CONFERENCE OF GOVERNMENTAL INDUSTRIAL HYGIENISTS CINCINNATI, OHIO, MAY 6-10, 1963. , 1963 .

[3]  Bindu Raju,et al.  Silica, Some Silicates, Coal Dust and Para-aramid Fibrils. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 68 , 1998, Cancer Causes & Control.

[4]  M. Jeyaratnam,et al.  COMPARISON OF α-QUARTZ STANDARD SIKRON F600 (HSE A9950) WITH THE NIST RESPIRABLE α-QUARTZ STANDARD SRM 1878 FOR BULK AND ON-FILTER ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[5]  K. Tan,et al.  Occupational respiratory diseases in Singapore. , 1996, Singapore medical journal.

[6]  R. Brandys 79. Global Occupational Exposure Limits for Over 3,500 Specific Chemicals , 2006 .

[7]  D. Bard,et al.  The performance of laboratories analysing alpha-quartz in the Workplace Analysis Scheme for Proficiency (WASP). , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  J M Boiano,et al.  Occupational silica exposure and risk of various diseases: an analysis using death certificates from 27 states of the United States , 2003, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[9]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Occupational silica exposure and lung cancer risk: a review of epidemiological studies 1996-2005. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  J. Chisholm Comparison of quartz standards for X-ray diffraction analysis: HSE A9950 (Sikron F600) and NIST SRM 1878. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  R Stamm,et al.  MEGA-database: one million data since 1972. , 2001, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[12]  R. Vincent,et al.  COLCHIC-occupational exposure to chemical agents database: current content and development perspectives. , 2001, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[13]  N. G. West,et al.  A comparison of X-ray diffraction and infrared spectrophotometric methods for the analysis of alpha-quartz in airborne dusts. , 1985, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  J. Protois,et al.  Comparison of direct (X-ray diffraction and infrared spectrophotometry) and indirect (infrared spectrophotometry) methods for the analysis of alpha-quartz in airborne dusts. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  M. Grzebyk,et al.  Comparison by X-ray Diffraction and Infrared Spectroscopy of Two Samples of α Quartz with the NIST SRM 1878a α Quartz , 2002 .

[16]  W. Miles Issues and controversy: the measurement of crystalline silica; review papers on analytical methods. , 1999, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[17]  X. M. Liu,et al.  Analysis of quartz by FT-IR in air samples of construction dust. , 2002, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[18]  A. Yassin,et al.  Occupational Exposure to Crystalline Silica Dust in the United States, 1988–2003 , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[19]  R. D. Foster,et al.  Quantitative determination of crystalline silica in respirable-size dust samples by infrared spectrophotometry. , 1984, The Analyst.

[20]  Deane K. Smith Evaluation of the detectability and quantification of respirable crystalline silica by X-ray powder diffraction methods , 1997, Powder Diffraction.

[21]  M. Fulekar Occupational exposure to dust in quartz manufacturing industry. , 1999, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[22]  J. Ojima Determining of Crystalline Silica in Respirable Dust Samples by Infrared Spectrophotometry in the Presence of Interferences , 2003, Journal of occupational health.

[23]  R. D. Hamilton,et al.  Chemical methods of analysis for crystalline silica: A critical literature review , 1994 .