A class of SONET-based self-healing ring (SHR) architectures and associated control schemes are reviewed. It is shown that the cost and capacity tradeoffs between bidirectional SHRs (B-SHRs) and unidirectional SHRs (U-SHRs) depend strongly upon the application, the network size and the demand pattern. An analysis of the impact on the SONET standard suggests that using automatic protection switching (APS) schemes with SONET SHR architectures requires a change of currently standardized SONET K1 and K2 overhead byte definitions and functionality. Alternatively, a simple distributed control scheme using path AIS avoids a change of the SONET standard in terms of K1 and K2 operations, and thus can be deployed on a timely basis and may ease intervendor compatibility problems. The selection of appropriate SONET SHR architectures depends upon the operating telephone companies' economic analysis, emphases on multivendor environment, SHR implementation time frame, and standards progress on making the change to support a bidirectional ring architecture. >
[1]
R. Ballart,et al.
SONET: now it's the standard optical network
,
1989,
IEEE Communications Magazine.
[2]
R. H. Cardwell,et al.
High-speed self-healing ring architectures for future interoffice networks
,
1989,
IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 1989, and Exhibition. 'Communications Technology for the 1990s and Beyond.
[3]
T.-H. Wu,et al.
Feasibility study of a high-speed SONET self-healing ring architecture in future interoffice networks
,
1990,
IEEE Communications Magazine.
[4]
R. H. Cardwell,et al.
Survivable network architectures for broad-band fiber optic networks: model and performance comparison
,
1988
.