An inquiry into the concept of SEA effectiveness: Towards criteria for Chinese practice

Abstract The importance of improving the effectiveness of Plan EIA and SEA-type evaluations in China cannot be overstated: at a time when the country's economy is being boosted by a stimulus package worth over RMB 400 trillion – largely for infrastructure – the pressure on China's already strained environment and resource base is bound to increase. The aim is to propose the criteria for plan EIA's effectiveness to raise the awareness of the need to strengthen the performance of the assessment and maximize its potential benefits. The authors first review critically the discourse on the effectiveness of the impact assessment, identifying three dimensions: substantive, procedural and incremental. The resulting conceptual framework allows them to interpret the weaknesses of the Chinese discourse on the effectiveness and of the practice of the Plan EIA to date. The result is the identification of a clear gap, both in terms of the breadth of the concept, and in terms of the quality of the existing criteria, which tend to be very generic to the point of inapplicability. The analysis also reveals a need for transitioning from formal models of the Plan EIA to more strategic approaches, in a gradual manner that is consistent with context-specificities. The proposal of a set of preliminary criteria for effectiveness is therefore structured on three levels. This framework is meant to input into the ongoing debate on how to improve the practice of PEIA and the SEA-type evaluations in China, and provide ideas for a government strategy aimed at maximizing the positive impact of PEIAs on planning, as well as on the context of application.

[1]  Arwin van Buuren,et al.  Evaluating strategic environmental assessment in The Netherlands: content, process and procedure as indissoluble criteria for effectiveness , 2009 .

[2]  Cun-kuan Bao,et al.  Framework and operational procedure for implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment in China , 2004 .

[3]  Richard Cowell,et al.  Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process , 2001 .

[4]  W. Sheate,et al.  Institutional Challenges for EIA Implementation in China: A Case Study of Development Versus Environmental Protection , 2005, Environmental management.

[5]  Jing Wu,et al.  STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN CHINA: OPPORTUNITIES, ISSUES AND CHALLENGES , 2009 .

[6]  Riki Therivel,et al.  Sustainability-focused impact assessment: English experiences , 2009 .

[7]  Juliet Corbin Criteria for Evaluation , 2007 .

[8]  Jiang Da-he The Evaluation for Effectiveness of Planning Environmental Impact Assessment Program , 2007 .

[9]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Assessing Impact, Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up , 2004 .

[10]  Maria Rosário Partidário,et al.  SEA ¿ Enhancing communication for better environmental decisions , 2006 .

[11]  A. L. Brown,et al.  SEA and planning: ‘ownership’ of strategic environmental assessment by the planners is the key to its effectiveness , 2009 .

[12]  Olivia Bina,et al.  Context and Systems: Thinking More Broadly About Effectiveness in Strategic Environmental Assessment in China , 2008, Environmental management.

[13]  Zhu Tan,et al.  STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) OF WASTEWATER REUSE POLICY: A CASE STUDY FROM TIANJIN IN CHINA , 2003 .

[14]  Tang Tao,et al.  Integrating environment into land-use planning through strategic environmental assessment in China: Towards legal frameworks and operational procedures , 2007 .

[15]  Maria Rosário Partidário,et al.  Perspectives on strategic environmental assessment , 2000 .

[16]  Jiang Ru,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment in China: motivations, politics, and effectiveness. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  O. Bina,et al.  Theorising strategic environmental assessment: fresh perspectives and future challenges , 2007 .

[18]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review , 1995 .

[19]  Alan Bond,et al.  Introduction: The effectiveness of impact assessment instruments , 2009 .

[20]  Humood A. Naser,et al.  Evaluation of the Environmental Impact Assessment System in Bahrain , 2012 .

[21]  Hens Runhaar,et al.  What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making , 2007 .

[22]  P. Gazzola,et al.  Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment - the significance of learning , 2009 .

[23]  Maria Rosário Partidário,et al.  Elements of an SEA framework— improving the added-value of SEA , 2000 .

[24]  D. B. Dalal-Clayton,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience , 2005 .

[25]  J. Diamond,et al.  China's environment in a globalizing world , 2005, Nature.

[26]  Minna Kaljonen,et al.  Views on planning and expectations of SEA: the case of transport planning , 2004 .

[27]  F. Retief EFFECTIVENESS OF STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) IN SOUTH AFRICA , 2007 .

[28]  Alan Bond,et al.  The role and functioning of environmental assessment: theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  Riki Therivel,et al.  Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology , 2000 .

[30]  J. Dryzek The Politics of the Earth , 2021 .

[31]  Jing Wu,et al.  REQUIREMENTS FOR STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN CHINA , 2005 .

[32]  O. Bina,et al.  New Agendas for Appraisal: Reflections on Theory, Practice, and Research , 2004 .

[33]  I. Mayer,et al.  Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design , 2004 .

[34]  Shin-Cheng Yeh,et al.  Reconstruction and systemization of the methodologies for strategic environmental assessment in Taiwan , 2006 .

[35]  O. Bina A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessment , 2007 .