Explaining Escalation Of Commitment In Information Technology Investments

Escalation of commitment to a failing course of action has been studied in the IT literature, where IT managers are shown to continue committing resources to bad project instead of terminating them. We make a case that escalation of commitment can be considered as the problem of not exercising an option to abandon a project at the correct (optimal) time. The value of a real option is time sensitive, and it’s realized value depends on the time of its exercise. IT literature suggests that managers may not be rational in their decision-making. We examine the implications of IT managers being bounded rational agents with time-inconsistent preferences, who apply intuitive thinking in managing abandonment option. Through modeling the option exercise decision with decision maker’s time inconsistent preferences, we illustrate conditions under which managers with different time preferences might behave in a similar fashion or differently with respect to option exercise.

[1]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation , 1992 .

[2]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The Bounded Rationality Bias in Managerial Valuation of Real Options: Theory and Evidence from IT Projects , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[3]  Ted O’Donoghue,et al.  Doing It Now or Later , 1999 .

[4]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[5]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  A Note on Project Risk and Option Values of Investments in Information Technologies , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Matthew Rabin,et al.  Incentives for Procrastinators , 1999 .

[7]  Ramessh Kumar,et al.  Understanding DSS value: an options perspective , 1999 .

[8]  Isabelle Brocas,et al.  Rush and Procrastination Under Hyperbolic Discounting and Interdependent Activities , 2001 .

[9]  Ajit Kambil,et al.  Strategic management of information technology investments: an options perspective , 2015 .

[10]  J. Hull Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives , 1989 .

[11]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  Managing risks in IT projects: an options perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Valuing information technology infrastructures: a growth options approach , 2007, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[13]  Zbigniew H. Przasnyski,et al.  On Information Systems Project Abandonment: An Exploratory Study of Organizational Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[14]  Asghar Zardkoohi,et al.  Do Real Options Lead to Escalation of Commitment , 2004 .

[15]  Ted O’Donoghue,et al.  Self-awareness and self-control , 2003 .

[16]  Frank LandVisiting Escalation in Decision Making: The Tragedy of Taurus , 1997 .

[17]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[18]  B. Santos Justifying investments in new information technologies , 1991 .

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  What Is Not A Real Option: Considering Boundaries for the Application of Real Options to Business Strategy , 2004 .

[20]  Shanefrederick,et al.  Time Discounting and Time Preference : A Critical Review , 2022 .

[21]  Mark Keil,et al.  ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARISON OF THREE THEORIES. , 1995 .

[22]  Bruno Jullien,et al.  Modelling time-inconsistent preferences , 2000 .

[23]  A. Tiwana,et al.  Beyond Valuation: “Options Thinking” in IT Project Management , 2005 .

[24]  R. Banker,et al.  Strategic information technology management: Perspectives on organizational growth and competitive advantage , 1993 .

[25]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  Effects of time-inconsistent preferences on information technology infrastructure investments with growth options , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Ulrike Malmendier,et al.  Contract Design and Self-Control: Theory and Evidence , 2004 .