Dip and depth extent of density boundaries using horizontal derivatives of upward‐continued gravity data

A new computer method was developed to derive values of dip and vertical extent, as well as location, for the truncated face of a horizontal‐plate model. The method is based on lateral offsets of the zero‐crossover point of the second horizontal derivative of an upward‐continued gravity profile. Application requires that the distance to the upper surface of the model be known. Numerical tests indicate useful results are obtained when both the length of the gravity profile, and the finite‐strike length of a model are at least three times the maximum depth extent of the model. Gaussian noise with a standard deviation of 1 mGal can be tolerated given an anomaly amplitude of 70 mGal. An example from the Trans‐Hudson Orogen of central Manitoba, Canada, indicates that the Kisseynew metasedimentary gneisses extend over a vertical distance of 16–18 km, and are separated from the Baldock batholith to the north by a near‐vertical boundary.

[1]  M. Odegard,et al.  Gravity interpretation using the Fourier integral , 1965 .

[2]  V. Grauch,et al.  Reconciliation of the discrete and integral Fourier transforms , 1982 .

[3]  Lindrith Cordell,et al.  Limitations of determining density or magnetic boundaries from the horizontal gradient of gravity or pseudogravity data , 1987 .

[4]  Bijon Sharma,et al.  GRAVITY ANOMALIES OF TWO‐DIMENSIONAL FAULTS , 1966 .

[5]  B. Darracott.  On the choice of a “2d” or “3d” model in gravity interpretation , 1976 .

[6]  L. Tsay.  A SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF UPWARD CONTINUATION OF POTENTIAL FIELD DATA , 1978 .

[7]  William J. Hinze,et al.  The Effect of Finite Data Length in the Spectral Analysis of Ideal Gravity Anomalies , 1976 .

[8]  Ronald Green,et al.  GRAVITY GRADIENTS AND THE INTERPRETATION OF THE TRUNCATED PLATE , 1976 .

[9]  J. Stanley.  SIMPLIFIED GRAVITY INTERPRETATION BY GRADIENTS—THE GEOLOGICAL CONTACT , 1977 .

[10]  S. Chacko,et al.  A method for analysing gravity anomalies due to a geologic contact by Fourier transform , 1980 .

[11]  B. Bhattacharyya.  DESIGN OF SPATIAL FILTERS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO HIGH‐RESOLUTION AEROMAGNETIC DATA , 1972 .

[12]  T. K. Bose,et al.  A GENERAL EXPRESSION FOR THE FOURIER TRANSFORM OF THE GRAVITY ANOMALY DUE TO A FAULT , 1977 .

[13]  L. Cordell,et al.  Reduction Of Unevenly Spaced Potential Field Data To A Horizontal Plane By Means Of Finite Harmonic Series , 1971 .

[14]  M. K. Paul,et al.  Direct interpretation of two-dimensional structural faults from gravity data , 1966 .

[15]  M. Bott.  A simple criterion for interpreting negative gravity anomalies , 1962 .

[16]  S. Hammer,et al.  EXPLORING FOR STRATIGRAPHIC TRAPS WITH GRAVITY GRADIENTS , 1975 .

[17]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[18]  C. Swain,et al.  A FORTRAN IV program for interpolating irregularly spaced data using the difference equations for minimum curvature , 1976 .

[19]  P. Hoffman,et al.  United Plates of America, The Birth of a Craton: Early Proterozoic Assembly and Growth of Laurentia , 1988 .

[20]  M. K. Paul,et al.  The gravity profile and its role in positioning the edge of a two-dimensional faulted structure having an arbitrary vertical variation of density , 1984 .

[21]  Ian Briggs.  Machine contouring using minimum curvature , 1974 .

[22]  R. Gibb.  A geological interpretation of the Bouguer anomalies adjacent to the Churchill–Superior boundary in northern Manitoba , 1968 .

[23]  Z. Hajnal,et al.  Deep seismic crustal studies in Manitoba , 1973 .