Assessment of MRI criteria for a diagnosis of MS

To test the reliability of four previously proposed MRI criteria for the diagnosis of MS, we reviewed 1,500 consecutive brain scans for the presence, number, size, and location of areas of increased signal (AIS) on proton-density and T2-weighted images, unaware of the patients' clinical presentations and ages. This series included 134 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of MS. Relying exclusively on the presence of at least three or four AIS for a positive diagnosis of MS resulted in high sensitivity (90% for three AIS and 87% for four) but inadequate specificity (71% for three AIS and 74% for four) and positive predictive value (23% for three AIS and 25% for four). If one of these lesions was required to border the lateral ventricles, specificity was 92% and positive predictive value was 50% at a sensitivity of 87%. Using the Fazekas criteria (at least three AIS and two of the following features: abutting body of lateral ventricles, infratentorial lesion location, and size <5 mm) led to a further highly significant improvement of specificity (96%; p = 0.0000) and increase of the positive predictive value (65%) at the expense of a less significant decrease in sensitivity (81%; p <0.01).

[1]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Unsuspected multiple sclerosis. , 1983, Archives of neurology.

[2]  J. G. Phadke,et al.  Atypical and clinically silent multiple sclerosis: a report of 12 cases discovered unexpectedly at necropsy. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[4]  R. Siddharthan,et al.  MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  S. Gilman,et al.  The initial diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Clinical impact of magnetic resonance imaging , 1985, Annals of neurology.

[6]  L. Jacobs,et al.  Subcortical Arteriosclerotic Encephalopathy (Binswanger's Disease): Computed Tomographic, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, and Clinical Correlations , 1985 .

[7]  I. Awad,et al.  Focal parenchymal lesions in transient ischemic attacks: correlation of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1986, Stroke.

[8]  R. Grossman,et al.  Head injury: early results of comparing CT and high-field MR. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  M. Aminoff,et al.  Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: A comparative study , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[10]  J. Mendell,et al.  Evidence for central nervous system demyelination in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy , 1987, Neurology.

[11]  A. A. Eisen,et al.  MRI in the diagnosis of MS , 1988, Neurology.

[12]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance image white matter lesions and risk factors for stroke in normal individuals. , 1988, Stroke.

[13]  D. Uhlenbrock,et al.  MR imaging in multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical, CSF, and visual evoked potential findings. , 1988, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  H Lechner,et al.  Criteria for an increased specificity of MRI interpretation in elderly subjects with suspected multiple sclerosis , 1988, Neurology.

[15]  F Fazekas,et al.  Magnetic resonance signal abnormalities in asymptomatic individuals: their incidence and functional correlates. , 1989, European neurology.

[16]  S. Hawke,et al.  Cranial magnetic resonance imaging in chronic demyelinating polyneuropathy. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[17]  T. Feasby,et al.  Central lesions in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy , 1990, Neurology.

[18]  W. Smoker,et al.  MRI in familial multiple sclerosis , 1990, Neurology.

[19]  F. Fazekas,et al.  The Prevalence of Cerebral Damage Varies With Migraine Type: A MRI Study , 1992, Headache.