Objective comparison of image quality and dose between conventional and synchrotron radiation mammography.

The shape of the energy spectrum produced by an x-ray tube has a great importance in mammography. Many anode-filtration combinations have been proposed to obtain the most effective spectrum shape for the image quality-dose relationship. On the other hand, third generation synchrotrons such as the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in Grenoble are able to produce a high flux of monoenergetic radiation. It is thus a powerful tool to study the effect of beam energy on image quality and dose in mammography. An objective method was used to evaluate image quality and dose in mammography with synchrotron radiation and to compare them to standard conventional units. It was performed systematically in the energy range of interest for mammography through the evaluation of a global image quality index and through the measurement of the mean glandular dose. Compared to conventional mammography units, synchrotron radiation shows a great improvement of the image quality-dose relationship, which is due to the beam monochromaticity and to the high intrinsic collimation of the beam, which allows the use of a slit instead of an anti-scatter grid for scatter rejection.

[1]  Andrzej Krol,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio and radiation dose as a function of photon energy in mammography , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[2]  P. Spanne,et al.  Instrumentation of the ESRF medical imaging facility , 1999 .

[3]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[4]  Nobuyuki Nakamori,et al.  X-ray tube voltage dependence of Wiener spectra of quantum mottle obtained by determining detective quantum efficiencies of a screen , 1996 .

[5]  D. Dance Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  G. Barnes,et al.  Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. , 1991, Radiology.

[7]  Auditing Mammographic Dose and Image Quality in the UK Breast Screening Programme , 1998 .

[8]  Chris Hall,et al.  Improvements in image quality and radiation dose in breast imaging , 1999 .

[9]  L Desponds,et al.  Image quality index (IQI) for screen-film mammography. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Y Pochon,et al.  Objective assessment of mammography systems. Part I: Method. , 1985, Radiology.

[11]  G T Barnes,et al.  Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography. , 1995, Radiology.

[12]  R. J. Eastgate,et al.  Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[13]  J. Boone,et al.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. , 1999, Radiology.

[14]  M Gambaccini,et al.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation. , 1995, Radiology.

[15]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  E. Pisano,et al.  Human breast cancer specimens: diffraction-enhanced imaging with histologic correlation--improved conspicuity of lesion detail compared with digital radiography. , 2000, Radiology.

[17]  F R Verdun,et al.  Survey on image quality and dose levels used in Europe for mammography. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  Matthew T. Freedman,et al.  Storage phosphor-based digital mammography using a low-dose x-ray system optimized for screen-film mammography , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[19]  L Desponds,et al.  Influence of anode and filter material on image quality and glandular dose for screen-film mammography. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  D R Dance,et al.  Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  M. Säbel,et al.  Recent developments in breast imaging. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  E Castelli,et al.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques. , 2000, Radiology.

[23]  J Law The influence of focal spot size on image resolution and test phantom scores in mammography. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  M Säbel,et al.  Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  W Knüpfer,et al.  Imaging characteristics of different mammographic screens. , 1992, Medical physics.

[26]  C. Schulze-Briese,et al.  Fixed-exit monochromator for computed tomography with synchrotron radiation at energies 18-90 keV. , 2000, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[27]  S C Lillicrap,et al.  Optimum x-ray spectra for mammography. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.