Objective comparison of image quality and dose between conventional and synchrotron radiation mammography.
暂无分享,去创建一个
F R Verdun | P Schnyder | P. Schnyder | F. Verdun | R. Moeckli | S. Fiedler | J F Valley | J. Valley | M. Pachoud | S Fiedler | R Moeckli | M Pachoud
[1] Andrzej Krol,et al. Signal-to-noise ratio and radiation dose as a function of photon energy in mammography , 1998, Medical Imaging.
[2] P. Spanne,et al. Instrumentation of the ESRF medical imaging facility , 1999 .
[3] J. S. Laughlin,et al. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.
[4] Nobuyuki Nakamori,et al. X-ray tube voltage dependence of Wiener spectra of quantum mottle obtained by determining detective quantum efficiencies of a screen , 1996 .
[5] D. Dance. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.
[6] G. Barnes,et al. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. , 1991, Radiology.
[7] Auditing Mammographic Dose and Image Quality in the UK Breast Screening Programme , 1998 .
[8] Chris Hall,et al. Improvements in image quality and radiation dose in breast imaging , 1999 .
[9] L Desponds,et al. Image quality index (IQI) for screen-film mammography. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.
[10] Y Pochon,et al. Objective assessment of mammography systems. Part I: Method. , 1985, Radiology.
[11] G T Barnes,et al. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography. , 1995, Radiology.
[12] R. J. Eastgate,et al. Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography. , 1981, Medical physics.
[13] J. Boone,et al. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. , 1999, Radiology.
[14] M Gambaccini,et al. Mammography with synchrotron radiation. , 1995, Radiology.
[15] R. F. Wagner,et al. Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.
[16] E. Pisano,et al. Human breast cancer specimens: diffraction-enhanced imaging with histologic correlation--improved conspicuity of lesion detail compared with digital radiography. , 2000, Radiology.
[17] F R Verdun,et al. Survey on image quality and dose levels used in Europe for mammography. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.
[18] Matthew T. Freedman,et al. Storage phosphor-based digital mammography using a low-dose x-ray system optimized for screen-film mammography , 1996, Medical Imaging.
[19] L Desponds,et al. Influence of anode and filter material on image quality and glandular dose for screen-film mammography. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.
[20] D R Dance,et al. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.
[21] M. Säbel,et al. Recent developments in breast imaging. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.
[22] E Castelli,et al. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques. , 2000, Radiology.
[23] J Law. The influence of focal spot size on image resolution and test phantom scores in mammography. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.
[24] M Säbel,et al. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.
[25] W Knüpfer,et al. Imaging characteristics of different mammographic screens. , 1992, Medical physics.
[26] C. Schulze-Briese,et al. Fixed-exit monochromator for computed tomography with synchrotron radiation at energies 18-90 keV. , 2000, Journal of synchrotron radiation.
[27] S C Lillicrap,et al. Optimum x-ray spectra for mammography. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.