论文信息 - A comparison of the stratified difference estimator with some monetary‐unit sampling estimators*

A comparison of the stratified difference estimator with some monetary‐unit sampling estimators*

. This paper extends some of the analysis reported in Duke, Leitch and Neter (1985) by comparing their “best” estimator with some new monetary unit procedures. Our finding is that some monetary unit sampling techniques compare favorably to the most efficient classical sampling techniques even when diffuse priors are used. Resume. Cet article elargit quelques-uns des elements d'analyse signales par Duke, Leitch et Neter (1985) en procedant a la comparaison de leur «meilleur» estimateur a quelques nouveaux procedes en unites monetaires. Nous constatons que quelques techniques d'echantillonnage en unites monetaires se comparent favorablement aux techniques les plus efficaces en echantillonnage classique, meme lorsque des prealables diffus sont utilises.

Wally J. Smieliauskas | Ulrich Menzefricke | Wally Smieliauskas | U. Menzefricke

[1] P. Frost,et al. Jackknifed Ratio Estimation in Statistical Auditing , 1982 .

[2] John Neter,et al. Power Characteristics of Test Statistics in the Auditing Environment: An Empirical Study , 1982 .

[3] Wally J. Smieliauskas. Control of sampling risks in auditing , 1986 .

[4] Richard A. Grimlund,et al. A Sampling Model for Audit Tests of Composite Accounts , 1977 .

[5] Wally J. Smieliauskas,et al. A Simulation Study Of The Performance Of Parametric Dollar Unit Sampling Statistical Procedures , 1984 .

[6] Richard A. Grimlund. An Integration Of Internal Control-System And Account Balance Evidence , 1982 .

[7] John Neter,et al. Bayesian Bounds for Monetary Unit Sampling in Accounting and Auditing , 1984 .

[8] David R. Cox,et al. On sampling and the estimation of rare errors , 1979 .