An interdisciplinary perspective on business appraisals for technology potentials

Appraising the benefits of new technologies is a commonly accepted challenge for any organisation and is a prime area for technology management research. As the future potential of any technology is always associated with some level of uncertainty it is thus important to either reduce or better understand this uncertainty in order to make appropriate business decisions. A wide variety of methods are available that intend to service this need, such as net present value calculations, real options, portfolio methods, road-mapping, expert systems, etc. Technology companies often use a selection of or hybrid models. The problem is thus inherently interdisciplinary. The techniques used to appraise new technologies range from “hard” mathematics, often taken from the finance sector, to more “softer” techniques that enable people to systematically structure the potential outcomes and their underlying uncertainty. Furthermore, the use or purpose of the techniques can vary as well. Methods can be applied to justify decisions and judgements made, but also to support the process of shaping this judgement, or to provide boundary conditions and hence enable the decision making process. This paper aims to provide an overview of prevailing methods and tools and evaluate their relative value in the process of business appraisals. We will elaborate on the overlaps and gaps and conclude with recommendations for future research.

[1]  P. Sevastianov,et al.  MCDM in a fuzzy setting: Investment projects assessment application , 2006 .

[2]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Early Valuation of Technology: Real Options, Hybrid Models and Beyond , 2004 .

[3]  K. Platts,et al.  Managing strategic investments: towards a resource allocation and analysis tool , 2004 .

[4]  D. Probert,et al.  Customizing roadmapping , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  What Is Not A Real Option: Considering Boundaries for the Application of Real Options to Business Strategy , 2004 .

[6]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Valuation of technology: exploring a practical hybrid model , 2003, PICMET '03: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology Technology Management for Reshaping the World, 2003..

[7]  Mehari Mekonnen Akalu The process of investment appraisal: the experience of 10 large British and Dutch companies , 2003 .

[8]  Sverrir Olafsson Making Decisions Under Uncertainty — Implications for High Technology Investments , 2003 .

[9]  Vladan Devedzic,et al.  Expert systems in finance - a cross-section of the field , 2002, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Da Ruan,et al.  Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic cash flows , 2002, Inf. Sci..

[11]  S. Benninga,et al.  Real Options—An Introduction and an Application to R&D Valuation , 2002 .

[12]  Edward H. Bowman,et al.  Real Options Analysis and Strategic Decision Making , 2001 .

[13]  R. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study , 2001 .

[14]  David Probert,et al.  Characterisation of technology roadmaps: purpose and format , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[15]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Strategies for Continuously Creating Opportunity in an Age of Uncertainty , 2001 .

[16]  Sharon M. Ordoobadi,et al.  Development of a justification tool for advanced manufacturing technologies: system-wide benefits value analysis , 2001 .

[17]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Science and technology roadmaps , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[18]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Evaluating growth options as sources of value for pharmaceutical research projects , 2001 .

[19]  Thomas A. Kappel,et al.  Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the future , 2001 .

[20]  Alan R. Fusfeld,et al.  Resolving Uncertainty in R&D Portfolios , 2000 .

[21]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Strategies for Continuously Creating Opportunity in an Age of Uncertainty , 2000 .

[22]  Diana I. Angelis,et al.  Capturing the Option Value of R&D , 2000 .

[23]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Developing a Process for the Relative Valuation of R&D Programmes , 2000 .

[24]  Christian Stummer,et al.  Research and development project selection and resource allocation: a review of quantitative modelling approaches , 1999 .

[25]  Nicolas P. B. Bollen,et al.  Real Options and Product Life Cycles , 1999 .

[26]  Stanley F. Slater,et al.  Evaluating Strategic Investments , 1998 .

[27]  F. Peter Boer,et al.  TRAPS, PITFALLS AND SNARES IN THE VALUATION OF TECHNOLOGY , 1998 .

[28]  David Dugdale,et al.  Investment in Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A Study of Practice in Large UK Companies , 1998 .

[29]  Rita Gunther McGrath A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments , 1997 .

[30]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[31]  Rita Gunther McGrath OPTIONS AND THE ENTERPRISE: TOWARD A STRATEGIC THEORY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL WEALTH CREATION. , 1996 .

[32]  Robert C. Megantz How to License Technology , 1996 .

[33]  T. W. Faulkner Applying ‘Options Thinking’ To R&D Valuation , 1996 .

[34]  L. Trigeorgis Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation , 1996 .

[35]  Raman Uppal,et al.  Valuing risk and flexibility: A comparison of methods , 1996 .

[36]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  An empirical study of capital budgeting practices for strategic investments in CIM technologies , 1995 .

[37]  H Raiffa,et al.  Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty. , 1969 .

[38]  I. Dobbs,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Decision-Making under Ambiguity , 1991 .

[39]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  Charles H. Willyard,et al.  Motorola's Technology Roadmap Process , 1987 .

[41]  Robert E. Markland,et al.  Quantitative Methods: Applications to Managerial Decision Making , 1987 .

[42]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[43]  E. Prescott,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty , 1971 .

[44]  M. Spencer Uncertainty, Expectations, and Foundations of the Theory of Planning , 1962 .

[45]  J. Schumpeter The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .