Data Quality Tags and Decision-making: Improving the Design and Validity of Experimental Studies

Providing decision-makers with information about the quality of the data they are using has been empirically shown to impact both decision outcomes and the decision-making process. However, little attention has been paid to the usability and relevance of the data quality tags and the experimental materials used in studies to date. In this paper, we highlight the potential impact of these issues on experimental validity and propose the use of interaction design techniques to address this problem. We describe current work that applies these techniques, including contextual inquiry and participatory design, to improve the design and validity of planned data quality tagging experiments. The benefits of this approach are illustrated by showing how the outcomes of a series of contextual inquiry interviews have influenced the design of the experimental materials. We argue that interaction design techniques should be used more widely for experimental design.

[1]  Elizabeth Tansley,et al.  Data quality tagging and decision outcomes: an experimental study , 2002 .

[2]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  The Impact of Data Quality Information on Decision Making: An Exploratory Analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[3]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.

[4]  Y. Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design , 2002 .

[5]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Developing a Measurement Instrument for Subjective Aspects of Information Quality , 2008, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Donald P. Ballou,et al.  Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems , 1985 .

[7]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A semiotic information quality framework: development and comparative analysis , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Graeme Shanks,et al.  Data Quality and Decision Making , 2008 .

[10]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  The Impact of Experience and Time on the Use of Data Quality Information in Decision Making , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Data quality in context , 1997, CACM.

[12]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Understanding Data Quality in a Data Warehouse , 1998, Aust. Comput. J..

[13]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[14]  Adir Even,et al.  Enhancing Decision Making with Process Metadata: Theoretical Framework, Research Tool, and Exploratory Examination , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[15]  Graeme Shanks,et al.  A Semiotic Information Quality Framework , 2004 .

[16]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .