Abstract This paper addresses the dynamic lot sizing model with the assumption that the equipment is subject to stochastic breakdowns. We consider two different situations. First we assume that after a machine breakdown the setup is totally lost and new setup cost is incurred. Second we consider the situation in which the cost of resuming the production run after a failure might be substantially lower than the production setup cost. We show that under the first assumption the cost penalty for ignoring machine failures will be noticeably higher than in the classical lot sizing case with static demand. For the second case, two lot sizes per period are required, an ordinary lot size and a specific second (or resumption) lot size. If during the production of a future period demand the production quantity exceeds the second lot size, the production run will be resumed after a breakdown and terminated if the amount produced is less than this lot size. Considering the results of the static lot sizing case, one would expect a different policy. To find an optimum lot sizing decision for both cases a stochastic dynamic programming model is suggested.
[1]
A. Seidmann,et al.
Production lot sizing with machine breakdowns
,
1992
.
[2]
Marc Salomon,et al.
Batching decisions: structure and models
,
1994
.
[3]
Marvin Zelen,et al.
Mathematical Theory of Reliability
,
1965
.
[4]
Sheldon M. Ross.
Introduction to Probability Models.
,
1995
.
[5]
Thomas L. Magnanti,et al.
Applied Mathematical Programming
,
1977
.
[6]
L. V. Wassenhove,et al.
Multilevel capacitated lotsizing complexity and LP-based heuristics
,
1991
.
[7]
R. D. Hughes,et al.
Mathematical Theory of Production Planning.
,
1984
.
[8]
H. Tempelmeier,et al.
A Lagrangean-based heuristic for dynamic multilevel multiitem constrained lotsizing with setup times
,
1996
.
[9]
W. D. Ray,et al.
Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach
,
1995
.
[10]
Horst Tempelmeier,et al.
A heuristic for dynamic multi-item multi-level capacitated lotsizing for general product structures
,
1994
.