Research Data Management and Libraries: Relationships, Activities, Drivers and Influences

The management of research data is now a major challenge for research organisations. Vast quantities of born-digital data are being produced in a wide variety of forms at a rapid rate in universities. This paper analyses the contribution of academic libraries to research data management (RDM) in the wider institutional context. In particular it: examines the roles and relationships involved in RDM, identifies the main components of an RDM programme, evaluates the major drivers for RDM activities, and analyses the key factors influencing the shape of RDM developments. The study is written from the perspective of library professionals, analysing data from 26 semi-structured interviews of library staff from different UK institutions. This is an early qualitative contribution to the topic complementing existing quantitative and case study approaches. Results show that although libraries are playing a significant role in RDM, there is uncertainty and variation in the relationship with other stakeholders such as IT services and research support offices. Current emphases in RDM programmes are on developments of policies and guidelines, with some early work on technology infrastructures and support services. Drivers for developments include storage, security, quality, compliance, preservation, and sharing with libraries associated most closely with the last three. The paper also highlights a ‘jurisdictional’ driver in which libraries are claiming a role in this space. A wide range of factors, including governance, resourcing and skills, are identified as influencing ongoing developments. From the analysis, a model is constructed designed to capture the main aspects of an institutional RDM programme. This model helps to clarify the different issues involved in RDM, identifying layers of activity, multiple stakeholders and drivers, and a large number of factors influencing the implementation of any initiative. Institutions may usefully benchmark their activities against the data and model in order to inform ongoing RDM activity.

[1]  Stephen Pinfield,et al.  Moving a brick building: UK libraries coping with research data management as a ‘wicked’ problem , 2016, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Angus Whyte,et al.  Delivering Research Data Management Services: Fundamentals of Good Practice , 2013 .

[3]  Stephen Pinfield,et al.  Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities , 2014, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Cox Andrew.  Graham Pryor, Sarah Jones and Angus Whyte, editors (2014) Delivering Research Data Management Services: Fundamentals of good practice. London: Facet.: , 2014 .

[5]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Curating research data: the potential roles of libraries and information professionals , 2014, J. Documentation.

[6]  Robert J. Sandusky,et al.  Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians , 2014 .

[7]  Virgil E. Varvel,et al.  Developing Data Management Services at the Johns Hopkins University , 2013 .

[8]  Mary Anne Kennan,et al.  Bibliometrics and Research Data Management Services: Emerging Trends in Library Support for Research , 2013, Libr. Trends.

[9]  Suzie Allard,et al.  Academic librarians and research data services: preparation and attitudes , 2013 .

[10]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[11]  Ruth E. Duerr,et al.  The Data Conservancy Instance: Infrastructure and Organizational Services for Research Data Curation , 2012, D Lib Mag..

[12]  C. Borgman.  The conundrum of sharing research data , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Liz Lyon.  The Informatics Transform: Re-Engineering Libraries for the Data Decade , 2012, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[14]  Graham Pryor.  Managing Research Data , 2012 .

[15]  P. Halfpenny,et al.  Research data management : opportunities and challenges for HEIs , 2012 .

[16]  Barbara Sen,et al.  Upskilling Liaison Librarians for Research Data Management , 2012 .

[17]  Sheila Corrall.  Roles and responsibilities: Libraries, librarians and data. , 2012 .

[18]  Jeff Haywood,et al.  Research Data Management Initiatives at University of Edinburgh , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[19]  Paul Jeffreys,et al.  An Institutional Approach to Developing Research Data Management Infrastructure , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[20]  Mary Anne Kennan,et al.  Learning to Share: Mandates and Open Access , 2011 .

[21]  Angus Whyte,et al.  Making the Case for Research Data Management , 2011 .

[22]  Jake Carlson,et al.  E-science, Cyberinfrastructure and the Changing Face of Scholarship: Organizing for New Models of Research Support at the Purdue University Libraries , 2010 .

[23]  M. J. Lewis.  Libraries and the management of research data , 2010 .

[24]  Leslie M. Delserone.  At the Watershed: Preparing for Research Data Management and Stewardship at the University of Minnesota Libraries , 2008, Libr. Trends.

[25]  Margaret Henty,et al.  Dreaming of Data: The Library's Role in Supporting e-Research and Data Management , 2008 .

[26]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .