Size Matters: Non-Numerical Magnitude Affects the Spatial Coding of Response

It is known that small and large numbers facilitate left/right respectively (the SNARC effect). Recently, it has been proposed that numerical magnitude is just one example of a range of quantities, which have a common cognitive/neural representation. To investigate this proposition, response congruency effects were explored for stimuli which differed according to their: (a) numerical size, (b) physical size, (c) luminance, (d) conceptual size and (e) auditory intensity. In a series of experiments, groups of undergraduate participants made two-alternative forced choice discriminations with their left or right hands. There were clear interactions between magnitude and responding hand whereby right hand responses were faster for stimuli with (a) large numbers, (b) large physical size, (c) low luminance, and (d) a reference to large objects. There was no congruency effect for the auditory stimuli. The data demonstrate that the response congruency effect observed for numbers also occurs for a variety of other non-numerical visual quantities. These results support models of general magnitude representation and suggest that the association between magnitude and the left/right sides of space may not be related to culture and/or directional reading habits.

[1]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  D. Stuss,et al.  How time modulates spatial responses , 2011, Cortex.

[3]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[5]  Julio Santiago,et al.  Time (also) flies from left to right , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Wim Gevers,et al.  Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[8]  W. Schwarz,et al.  The perception of temporal order along the mental number line. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Mental Representation of Ordinal Sequences is Spatially Organised: Evidence from Days of the Week , 2004, Cortex.

[10]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990 .

[11]  J. Lammertyn,et al.  The hunt for SNARC , 2005 .

[12]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Quantity without numbers and numbers without quantity in the parietal cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Numbers, space, and action – From finger counting to the mental number line and beyond , 2008, Cortex.

[14]  Mowbray Gh,et al.  On discriminating the rate of visual flicker and auditory flutter. , 1959 .

[15]  G H MOWBRAY,et al.  On discriminating the rate of visual flicker and auditory flutter. , 1959, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  Vincent Walsh.  A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Samar Zebian,et al.  Linkages between Number Concepts, Spatial Thinking, and Directionality of Writing: The SNARC Effect and the REVERSE SNARC Effect in English and Arabic Monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic Speakers , 2005 .

[19]  Robin Clark,et al.  Quantifier comprehension in corticobasal degeneration , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Finger–digit compatibility in Arabic numeral processing , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Sheng He,et al.  Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[22]  W Fias,et al.  Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[24]  Avishai Henik,et al.  When brightness counts: the neuronal correlate of numerical-luminance interference. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Robert B. Welch,et al.  Contributions of audition and vision to temporal rate perception , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Sara Torriero,et al.  Motor and Linguistic Linking of Space and Time in the Cerebellum , 2009, PloS one.

[28]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task , 2001, NeuroImage.

[29]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  rTMS over the intraparietal sulcus disrupts numerosity processing , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Spatial associations in number-related tasks: A comparison of manual and pedal responses. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[31]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  On the functional role of human parietal cortex in number processing: How gender mediates the impact of a ‘virtual lesion’ induced by rTMS , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  K. Willmes,et al.  The universal SNARC effect: the association between number magnitude and space is amodal. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[33]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Virtual Dyscalculia Induced by Parietal-Lobe TMS Impairs Automatic Magnitude Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[34]  S. Dehaene,et al.  A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[35]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Numbers within Our Hands: Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability of Hand Muscles during Numerical Judgment , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  L. E. Rohr,et al.  Task demands affect manual asymmetries in pegboard performance , 2007, Laterality.

[37]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[38]  Y. Samson,et al.  The Functional Anatomy of Sound Intensity Discrimination , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.