Variability of an Ideal Insertion Vector for Cochlear Implantation

Hypothesis Based on a three-dimensional analysis, the orientation of the basal turn of the cochlea, the disposition of the basilar membrane, and the characteristics of the hook region—all of which determine the ideal electrode insertion vector during cochlear implantation—might vary among individuals to a greater degree than previously considered. The aim of this study is to assess the variability of an ideal insertion vector among a sample of surgical candidates from a purely anatomical perspective as well as from a more intraoperative-surgical perspective. Background During cochlear implantation through a cochleostomy or round window approach, the angle or vector of insertion after the first entry point seems to be related to intracochlear damage, which might correlate with anatomical and functional features. Methods Three-dimensional reconstructions of the temporal bones of 50 cochlear implant candidates (a total of 100 ears) were assessed. The spatial orientation of an ideal insertion vector for a cochleostomy and a round window approach were estimated. Results A difference as great as 60 degrees was observed for an ideal insertion vector among the subjects. From an intraoperative perspective, this variability involves pushing the electrodes “as near to the buttress” or “as near to the emergence of the corda tympani” as possible, depending on the case. Conclusion The orientation of the basal turn and the corresponding ideal electrode insertion vector vary widely among subjects. A proper preoperative estimation on a case-to-case scenario for this feature might lead to technique adaptation during insertion, possibly contributing to minimizing electrode insertion trauma and thus optimizing the anatomical and functional results.

[1]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Cochleostomy site: Implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  A. Eshraghi,et al.  Comparative Study of Cochlear Damage With Three Perimodiolar Electrode Designs , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  Timothy Beale,et al.  Developmental Changes in Cochlear Orientation-Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  M. Praetorius,et al.  Gentherapie und Stammzellen für das Innenohr , 2014, HNO.

[5]  Helge Rask-Andersen,et al.  Variational Anatomy of the Human Cochlea: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[6]  Andreas Radeloff,et al.  Scala Tympani Cochleostomy II: Topography and Histology , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: A histologically controlled insertion study , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  Wei Liu,et al.  Human Cochlea: Anatomical Characteristics and their Relevance for Cochlear Implantation , 2012, Anatomical record.

[9]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Impact of Hair Cell Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: Combined Electric and Acoustic Hearing , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[10]  Adrien A Eshraghi,et al.  The perceived angle of the round window affects electrode insertion trauma in round window insertion – an anatomical study , 2011, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[11]  John K. Niparko,et al.  Cochlear Coiling Pattern and Orientation Differences in Cochlear Implant Candidates , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  L. Antiga Patient-specific modeling of ge-ometry and blood flow in large arteries , 2003 .

[13]  D W Kennedy,et al.  Multichannel intracochlear electrodes: Mechanism of insertion trauma , 1987, The Laryngoscope.

[14]  Alán Alpár,et al.  Surgical anatomy of the cochlea for cochlear implantation. , 2006, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[15]  O. JuanCristóbalMaass,et al.  Terapia génica como herramienta molecular para regenerar células ciliadas , 2009 .

[16]  Ilona Anderson,et al.  Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation , 2008, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  Peter S Roland,et al.  Temporal bone microdissection for anatomic study of cochlear implant electrodes , 2005, Cochlear implants international.

[18]  P. Skarżyński,et al.  Atraumatic round window deep insertion of cochlear electrodes , 2011, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[19]  A Radeloff,et al.  Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli , 2005, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[20]  S. S. Stevens On Hearing by Electrical Stimulation , 1937 .

[21]  Bernard Fraysse,et al.  The Size of the Cochlea and Predictions of Insertion Depth Angles for Cochlear Implant Electrodes , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[22]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  Xenia Meshik,et al.  Optimal Cochlear Implant Insertion Vectors , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[24]  T. H. Bast XXXII Development of the Otic Capsule , 1942 .

[25]  Y. Raphael,et al.  Gene therapy for the inner ear , 2013, Hearing Research.

[26]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Residual Spiral Ganglion Cell Count as Determined by Comparison with the Contralateral Nonimplanted Inner Ear in Humans , 2005, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[27]  B. Gantz,et al.  New frontiers in cochlear implantation: acoustic plus electric hearing, hearing preservation, and more. , 2012, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[28]  G M Clark,et al.  Surgical implications of perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode design: avoiding intracochlear damage and scala vestibuli insertion , 2001, Cochlear implants international.

[29]  Ki-Uk Nam,et al.  Frankfort horizontal plane is an appropriate three-dimensinal reference in the evaluation of clinical and skeletal cant , 2013, Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[30]  Y. Stelzig,et al.  Cochleaimplantatversorgung in Deutschland , 2012, HNO.

[31]  A. Tribukait,et al.  Function of semicircular canals, utricles and saccules in deaf children , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[32]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Hearing Conservation Surgery Using the Hybrid-L Electrode , 2009, Audiology and Neurotology.

[33]  J Thomas Roland,et al.  Surgical techniques in cochlear implants. , 2012, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[34]  P. K. Plinkert,et al.  Chirurgische Technik der Kochleaimplantation , 2009, HNO.

[35]  L. Ramma,et al.  Potential roles of stem cells in the management of sensorineural hearing loss , 2012, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[36]  English R. King,et al.  Cochleostomy Versus Round Window Insertions: Influence on Functional Outcomes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[37]  J. Werner,et al.  [Intracochlear electrode position: evaluation after deep insertion using cone beam computed tomography]. , 2012, HNO.