Integration and Reuse in Cognitive Skill Acquisition

Previous accounts of cognitive skill acquisition have demonstrated how procedural knowledge can be obtained and transformed over time into skilled task performance. This article focuses on a complementary aspect of skill acquisition, namely the integration and reuse of previously known component skills. The article posits that, in addition to mechanisms that proceduralize knowledge into more efficient forms, skill acquisition requires tight integration of newly acquired knowledge and previously learned knowledge. Skill acquisition also benefits from reuse of existing knowledge across disparate task domains, relying on indexicals to reference and share necessary information across knowledge components. To demonstrate these ideas, the article proposes a computational model of skill acquisition from instructions focused on integration and reuse, and applies this model to account for behavior across seven task domains.

[1]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[2]  G. Nunberg.  Indexicality and deixis , 1993 .

[3]  N. Taatgen,et al.  The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Allen Newell,et al.  Toward a Soar theory of taking instructions for immediate reasoning tasks , 1993 .

[5]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.

[6]  Andrew Howes,et al.  A cognitive constraint model of dual-task trade-offs in a highly dynamic driving task , 2007, CHI.

[7]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[8]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  A source activation theory of working memory: cross-task prediction of performance in ACT-R , 2000, Cognitive Systems Research.

[10]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[11]  John R. Anderson,et al.  ACT-R: A Theory of Higher Level Cognition and Its Relation to Visual Attention , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Frank J. Lee,et al.  Does Learning a Complex Task Have to Be Complex?: A Study in Learning Decomposition , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  John E. Laird,et al.  Research in human-level AI using computer games , 2002, CACM.

[14]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  The Multitasking Mind , 2010, Oxford series on cognitive models and architectures.

[15]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Automated Eye-Movement Protocol Analysis , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[17]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning Real-time Over-the-shoulder Instructions in a Dynamic Task , 2004, ICCM.

[18]  R. Haskell.  Transfer of Learning: Cognition, Instruction, and Reasoning , 2000 .

[19]  Wayne D. Gray.  Cognitive Architectures: Choreographing the Dance of Mental Operations With the Task Environment , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[20]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Brain Regions Engaged by Part- and Whole-task Performance in a Video Game: A Model-based Test of the Decomposition Hypothesis , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Rule Acquisition Events in the Discovery of Problem-Solving Strategies , 1991, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Internalizing and the Use Specificity of Device Knowledge , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  John R. Anderson.  How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[24]  John E. Laird,et al.  Flexibly Instructable Agents , 1995, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[25]  Dario D. Salvucci.  Modeling Driver Behavior in a Cognitive Architecture , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[26]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action. , 2009, Psychological review.

[27]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[28]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.

[29]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Andrew Howes,et al.  The adaptive user: an investigation into the cognitive and task constraints on the generation of new methods. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[31]  Richard M. Young,et al.  The Role of Cognitive Architecture in Modeling the User: Soar's Learning Mechanism , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[32]  Dario D. Salvucci.  An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.

[33]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Modeling Parallelization and Flexibility Improvements in Skill Acquisition: From Dual Tasks to Complex Dynamic Skills , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  A. Newell.  You can't play 20 questions with nature and win : projective comments on the papers of this symposium , 1973 .

[35]  Frank J. Lee,et al.  Production Compilation: A Simple Mechanism to Model Complex Skill Acquisition , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[36]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Eye tracking the visual search of click-down menus , 1999, CHI '99.

[37]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Embodied models as simulated users: introduction to this special issue on using cognitive models to improve interface design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  Arthur M. Glenberg,et al.  Indexical understanding of instructions , 1999 .

[39]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Vertical Visual Field and Implications for the Head-Up Display , 1992 .

[40]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[41]  Allen Newell,et al.  SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[42]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[43]  John R. Anderson.  Interference: The relationship between response latency and response accuracy. , 1981 .

[44]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Transfer of Cognitive Skill , 1989 .

[45]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Skill Acquisition: Compilation of Weak-Method Problem Solutions. , 1987 .

[46]  Dario D. Salvucci.  Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: an integrated model approach , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[47]  Randolph M. Jones,et al.  Automated Intelligent Pilots for Combat Flight Simulation , 1998, AI Mag..

[48]  Robert E. Haskell.  Transfer of Learning: What It Is and Why It's Important , 2001 .

[49]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Concept Discovery in a Scientific Domain , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[50]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  ACT-R/PM and menu selection: applying a cognitive architecture to HCI , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[51]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning to achieve perfect timesharing: architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The acquisition of robust and flexible cognitive skills. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Modeling meta-cognition in a cognitive architecture , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.