Causal role of spatial attention in arithmetic problem solving: Evidence from left unilateral neglect

Recent behavioural and brain imaging studies have provided evidence for rightward and leftward attention shifts while solving addition and subtraction problems respectively, suggesting that mental arithmetic makes use of mechanisms akin to those underlying spatial attention. However, this hypothesis mainly relies on correlative data and the causal relevance of spatial attention for mental arithmetic remains unclear. In order to test whether the mechanisms underlying spatial attention are necessary to perform arithmetic operations, we compared the performance of right brain-lesioned patients, with and without left unilateral neglect, and healthy controls in addition and subtraction of two-digit numbers. We predicted that patients with left unilateral neglect would be selectively impaired in the subtraction task while being unimpaired in the addition task. The results showed that neglect patients made more errors than the two other groups to subtract large numbers, whereas they were still able to solve large addition problems matched for difficulty and magnitude of the answer. This finding demonstrates a causal relationship between the ability to attend the left side of space and the solving of large subtraction problems. A plausible account is that attention shifts help localizing the position of the answer on a spatial continuum while subtracting large numbers.

[1]  M. Neppi-Modona,et al.  Functional independence between numerical and visual space: Evidence from right brain-damaged patients , 2012, Cortex.

[2]  J. Freyd,et al.  Transformations of visual memory induced by implied motions of pattern elements. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Viv Hampshire Around the clock , 2014 .

[4]  Wim Fias,et al.  Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Spatial Attention Interacts With Serial-Order Retrieval From Verbal Working Memory , 2013, Psychological science.

[6]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Attentional Bias Induced by Solving Simple and Complex Addition and Subtraction Problems , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  K. Willmes,et al.  Object-based neglect in number processing , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[8]  Wim Fias,et al.  Non-spatial neglect for the mental number line , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Bruno Fimm,et al.  A test battery for attentional performance , 2002 .

[10]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  The Number Space and Neglect , 2004, Cortex.

[11]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Spatial Neglect: A Clinical Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment , 1999 .

[12]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[13]  Michael Andres,et al.  Common substrate for mental arithmetic and finger representation in the parietal cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.

[14]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical mental number lines in neglect , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[17]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Franco Cauda,et al.  Mental number line disruption in a right-neglect patient after a left-hemisphere stroke , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  T. Verguts,et al.  Beyond the mental number line: A neural network model of number–space interactions , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Left to right: Representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Impairments of the mental number line for two-digit numbers in neglect , 2008, Cortex.

[22]  M. Denis,et al.  Reopening the Mental Imagery Debate: Lessons from Functional Anatomy , 1998, NeuroImage.

[23]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Moving along the Number Line: Operational Momentum in Nonsymbolic Arithmetic , 2006 .

[24]  Koleen McCrink,et al.  Operational momentum in large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-olds. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  Jon Driver,et al.  Impaired Spatial Working Memory: One Component of the Visual Neglect Syndrome? , 2004, Cortex.

[26]  Paola Guariglia,et al.  Spatial Orienting Biases in the Decimal Numeral System , 2009, Current Biology.

[27]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations , 2011, Cognition.

[28]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  Paola Guariglia,et al.  Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Helen De Cruz,et al.  Why are some numerical concepts more successful than others? An evolutionary perspective on the history of number concepts , 2006 .

[31]  J. LeFevre,et al.  Phonological and visual working memory in mental addition , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Fabrizio Doricchi,et al.  Small numbers in the right brain: Evidence from patients without and with spatial neglect , 2013, Cortex.

[33]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Spatial Interferences in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence from the Motion–Arithmetic Compatibility Effect , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Jon Driver,et al.  Spatial working memory deficit in unilateral neglect , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Michael Andres,et al.  Role of distinct parietal areas in arithmetic: An fMRI-guided TMS study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[37]  Martin H. Fischer Mental Number Line , 2013 .

[38]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Explicit versus Implicit Processing of Representational Space in Neglect: Dissociations in Accessing the Mental Number Line , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  D. Boisson,et al.  Does Action Make the Link Between Number and Space Representation? , 2004, Psychological science.

[40]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic , 2008, Cognition.

[41]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[42]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[43]  Laure Zago,et al.  How verbal and spatial manipulation networks contribute to calculation: An fMRI study , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  Oliver Lindemann,et al.  Operational momentum in numerosity production judgments of multi-digit number problems , 2011 .

[45]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Prism adaptation improves representational neglect , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  Fabrizio Doricchi,et al.  No inherent left and right side in human 'mental number line': evidence from right brain damage. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Spatial bias in symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison in neglect , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Spatial Intuition in Elementary Arithmetic: A Neurocomputational Account , 2012, PloS one.

[49]  Masami Ishihara,et al.  Neglect "around the clock": Dissociating number and spatial neglect in right brain damage , 2011 .

[50]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  A Parametric fMRI Study of Overt and Covert Shifts of Visuospatial Attention , 2001, NeuroImage.

[53]  Margarete Delazer,et al.  The Mental Representation of Ordered Sequences in Visual Neglect , 2007, Cortex.

[54]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Heterogeneous Nature of Number–Space Interactions , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[55]  M. Perenin,et al.  Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect , 1998, Nature.

[56]  Arthur MacNeill Horton,et al.  Wechsler Memory Scale III , 1999 .