Penetration tracks in aerogel produced by Al2O3 spheres

Abstract— We conducted impact experiments into SiO2‐based aerogel of uniform density (0.02 g cm−3) with spherical corundum projectiles. The highly refractory nature and mechanical strength of corundum minimizes projectile deformation and continuous mass loss by ablation that might have affected earlier experiments with soda‐lime glass (SLG) impactors into aerogel targets. We find that corundum is a vastly superior penetrator producing tracks a factor of 2.5 longer, yet similar in diameter to those made by SLG. At velocities <4 km s−1 a cylindrical “cavity” forms, largely by melting of aerogel. The diameter and length of this cavity increase with velocity and impactor size, and its volume dominates total track volume. A continuously tapering, exceptionally long and slender “stylus” emerges from this cavity and makes up some 80–90% of the total track length; this stylus is characterized by solid‐state deformations. Tracks formed below 4 km s−1 lack the molten cavity and consist only of a stylus. Projectile residues recovered from a track's terminus substantially resemble the initial impactors at V > 4 km s−1, yet they display two distinct surfaces at higher velocities, such as a blunt, forward face and a well‐preserved, hemispherical trailing side; a pronounced, circumferential ridge of compressed and molten aerogel separates these two surfaces. Stringers and patches of melt flow towards the impactor's rear where they accumulate in a characteristic melt tip. SEM‐EDS analyses indicate the presence of Al in these melts at velocities as low as 5.2 km s−1, indicating that the melting point of corundum (2054 °C) was exceeded. The thermal model of aerogel impact by Anderson and Cherne (2008) suggests actual aerogel temperatures <5000 K at comparable conditions. We therefore propose that projectile melting occurs predominantly at those surfaces that are in contact with this very hot aerogel, at the expense of viscous heating and associated ablation. Exposure to superheated aerogel may be viewed as extreme form of “flash heating.” This seems consistent with observations from the Stardust mission to comet Wild 2, such as relatively pristine interiors of rather large, terminal particles, yet total melting of most fine‐grained dust components.

[1]  S. Messenger,et al.  Relict Amorphous Silicates in Stardust Samples , 2008 .

[2]  M. Burchell,et al.  Sulfur Mobilization in Stardust Impact Tracks , 2008 .

[3]  W. Anderson,et al.  Model Development for Assessment of Thermal Histories of Returned Stardust Cometary Dust Samples , 2008 .

[4]  Simon F. Green,et al.  Characteristics of cometary dust tracks in Stardust aerogel and laboratory calibrations , 2008 .

[5]  M. Burchell,et al.  Bulbous tracks arising from hypervelocity capture in aerogel , 2008 .

[6]  M. Chi,et al.  Comparison of Comet 81P/Wild 2 Dust with Interplanetary Dust from Comets , 2008, Science.

[7]  M. Burchell,et al.  Thermal alteration of hydrated minerals during hypervelocity capture to silica aerogel at the flyby speed of Stardust , 2007 .

[8]  Andrew Steele,et al.  Comet 81P/Wild 2 Under a Microscope , 2006, Science.

[9]  Ian Wright,et al.  Impact Features on Stardust: Implications for Comet 81P/Wild 2 Dust , 2006, Science.

[10]  Hajime Yano,et al.  Mineralogy and Petrology of Comet 81P/Wild 2 Nucleus Samples , 2006, Science.

[11]  Tomoki Nakamura,et al.  Bulk mineralogical changes of hydrous micrometeorites during heating in the upper atmosphere at temperatures below 1000 °C , 2006 .

[12]  Mark J. Burchell,et al.  COSMIC DUST COLLECTION IN AEROGEL , 2006 .

[13]  A. Westphal,et al.  Energy loss and impact cratering in aerogels: theory and experiment , 2004 .

[14]  S. Bajt,et al.  Aerogel keystones: Extraction of complete hypervelocity impact events from aerogel collectors , 2003, astro-ph/0312460.

[15]  Michael E. Zolensky,et al.  Wild 2 and interstellar sample collection and Earth return , 2003 .

[16]  M. Burchell,et al.  Capture of particles in hypervelocity impacts in aerogel , 2001 .

[17]  Michael E. Zolensky,et al.  Impact Features and Projectile Residues in Aerogel Exposed on Mir , 2000 .

[18]  D. Brownlee,et al.  Capture of Hypervelocity Particles with Low-Density Aerogel , 1998 .

[19]  W. Anderson,et al.  Physics of interplanetary dust capture via impact into organic polymer foams , 1994 .

[20]  W. Nellis,et al.  Observations of high-velocity, weakly shocked ejecta from experimental impacts , 1993, Nature.

[21]  D. Stoeffler Deformation and transformation of rock-forming minerals by natural and experimental shock processes. I - Behavior of minerals under shock compression. , 1972 .

[22]  T. Trucano,et al.  Impact shock and penetration fragmentation in porous media , 1995 .

[23]  M. Zolensky,et al.  Suitability of silica aerogel as a capture medium for interplanetary dust , 1992 .

[24]  P Tsou,et al.  Intact capture of hypervelocity projectiles. , 1990, International journal of impact engineering.

[25]  T. Ahrens,et al.  Shock compression and adiabatic release of lunar fines from Apollo 17 , 1974 .

[26]  R. Mackenzie The differential thermal investigation of clays , 1957 .