Scaffold Hopping Using Clique Detection Applied to Reduced Graphs

Similarity-based methods for virtual screening are widely used. However, conventional searching using 2D chemical fingerprints or 2D graphs may retrieve only compounds which are structurally very similar to the original target molecule. Of particular current interest then is scaffold hopping, that is, the ability to identify molecules that belong to different chemical series but which could form the same interactions with a receptor. Reduced graphs provide summary representations of chemical structures and, therefore, offer the potential to retrieve compounds that are similar in terms of their gross features rather than at the atom-bond level. Using only a fingerprint representation of such graphs, we have previously shown that actives retrieved were more diverse than those found using Daylight fingerprints. Maximum common substructures give an intuitively reasonable view of the similarity between two molecules. However, their calculation using graph-matching techniques is too time-consuming for use in practical similarity searching in larger data sets. In this work, we exploit the low cardinality of the reduced graph in graph-based similarity searching. We reinterpret the reduced graph as a fully connected graph using the bond-distance information of the original graph. We describe searches, using both the maximum common induced subgraph and maximum common edge subgraph formulations, on the fully connected reduced graphs and compare the results with those obtained using both conventional chemical and reduced graph fingerprints. We show that graph matching using fully connected reduced graphs is an effective retrieval method and that the actives retrieved are likely to be topologically different from those retrieved using conventional 2D methods.

[1]  Peter Willett,et al.  Maximum common subgraph isomorphism algorithms for the matching of chemical structures , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[2]  Robert P Sheridan,et al.  Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[3]  John M. Barnard,et al.  Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Andreas Bender,et al.  Similarity Searching of Chemical Databases Using Atom Environment Descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): Evaluation of Performance , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[5]  U Schopfer,et al.  Molecular diversity management strategies for building and enhancement of diverse and focused lead discovery compound screening collections. , 2004, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[6]  Pierre Acklin,et al.  Similarity Metrics for Ligands Reflecting the Similarity of the Target Proteins , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[7]  Peter Willett,et al.  RASCAL: Calculation of Graph Similarity using Maximum Common Edge Subgraphs , 2002, Comput. J..

[8]  Peter Willett,et al.  Similarity Searching in Files of Three-Dimensional Chemical Structures. Alignment of Molecular Electrostatic Potential Fields with a Genetic Algorithm , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[9]  Darren V. S. Green,et al.  The Reduced Graph Descriptor in Virtual Screening and Data-Driven Clustering of High-Throughput Screening Data , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[10]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Chemical Similarity Using Physiochemical Property Descriptors , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[11]  M. Lajiness Dissimilarity-based compound selection techniques , 1996 .

[12]  G. Bemis,et al.  The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  M. Stahl,et al.  Scaffold hopping. , 2004, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[14]  Peter Willett,et al.  Promoting Access to White Rose Research Papers Effectiveness of Graph-based and Fingerprint-based Similarity Measures for Virtual Screening of 2d Chemical Structure Databases , 2022 .

[15]  Coenraad Bron,et al.  Finding all cliques of an undirected graph , 1973 .

[16]  Schmid,et al.  "Scaffold-Hopping" by Topological Pharmacophore Search: A Contribution to Virtual Screening. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[17]  P. Willett,et al.  Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. , 2004, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[18]  Valerie J. Gillet,et al.  Further Development of Reduced Graphs for Identifying Bioactive Compounds. , 2003 .

[19]  Jonas Boström,et al.  Reproducing the conformations of protein-bound ligands: A critical evaluation of several popular conformational searching tools , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[20]  J. A. Grant,et al.  A fast method of molecular shape comparison: A simple application of a Gaussian description of molecular shape , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[21]  J. A. Grant,et al.  A shape-based 3-D scaffold hopping method and its application to a bacterial protein-protein interaction. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[22]  Andrew M Davis,et al.  Components of successful lead generation. , 2005, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[23]  Yoshimasa Takahashi,et al.  Automatic identification of molecular similarity using reduced-graph representation of chemical structure , 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[24]  Y. Martin,et al.  Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity? , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  Valerie J. Gillet,et al.  Computer storage and retrieval of generic chemical structures in patents. 8. Reduced chemical graphs and their applications in generic chemical structure retrieval , 1987, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[26]  John Bradshaw,et al.  Similarity Searching Using Reduced Graphs , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..