Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief

An analytic cognitive style denotes a propensity to set aside highly salient intuitions when engaging in problem solving. We assess the hypothesis that an analytic cognitive style is associated with a history of questioning, altering, and rejecting (i.e., unbelieving) supernatural claims, both religious and paranormal. In two studies, we examined associations of God beliefs, religious engagement (attendance at religious services, praying, etc.), conventional religious beliefs (heaven, miracles, etc.) and paranormal beliefs (extrasensory perception, levitation, etc.) with performance measures of cognitive ability and analytic cognitive style. An analytic cognitive style negatively predicted both religious and paranormal beliefs when controlling for cognitive ability as well as religious engagement, sex, age, political ideology, and education. Participants more willing to engage in analytic reasoning were less likely to endorse supernatural beliefs. Further, an association between analytic cognitive style and religious engagement was mediated by religious beliefs, suggesting that an analytic cognitive style negatively affects religious engagement via lower acceptance of conventional religious beliefs. Results for types of God belief indicate that the association between an analytic cognitive style and God beliefs is more nuanced than mere acceptance and rejection, but also includes adopting less conventional God beliefs, such as Pantheism or Deism. Our data are consistent with the idea that two people who share the same cognitive ability, education, political ideology, sex, age and level of religious engagement can acquire very different sets of beliefs about the world if they differ in their propensity to think analytically.

[1]  William Sims Bainbridge,et al.  The Future of Religion , 2023 .

[2]  S. Sloman,et al.  Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. , 2007, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[3]  P. Boyer Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought , 2001 .

[4]  David G. Rand,et al.  Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  B. Kosmin,et al.  American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS 2008) , 2009 .

[6]  M. Argyle,et al.  The Social Psychology of Religion , 1976 .

[7]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Jonathan Evans Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  J. Cheyne Recurrent Isolated Sleep Paralysis , 2010 .

[10]  R. Hinde,et al.  In Gods we Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion , 2003 .

[11]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  Intuition, reason, and metacognition , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Scott Atran,et al.  Memory and Mystery: The Cultural Selection of Minimally Counterintuitive Narratives , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin , 2004 .

[14]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information , 1990 .

[15]  William M. Newman,et al.  Political Ideology and Religious Preference: The John Birch Society and the Americans for Democratic Action , 1973 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP , 1999 .

[17]  Scott Atran,et al.  Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  K. Stanovich,et al.  On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  I. Pyysiäinen How Religion Works: Towards a New Cognitive Science of Religion , 2001 .

[20]  Effie Fokas Secularism and secularity: Contemporary international perspectives , 2010 .

[21]  K. Stanovich Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? , 2008 .

[22]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[23]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking , 2008, Cognition.

[24]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[25]  J. Tobacyk A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale , 2004 .

[26]  Robert M. Hauser,et al.  Trends in Black-White Test Score Differentials: II. The WORDSUM Vocabulary Test , 1998 .

[27]  S Epstein,et al.  The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  R. Lynn,et al.  Average intelligence predicts atheism rates across 137 nations , 2009 .

[29]  J. Barrett Exploring the natural foundations of religion , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Egon Mayer,et al.  American Religious Identification Survey , 2001 .

[31]  P. Zuckerman Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns. , 2006 .

[32]  C. Caldwell-Harris,et al.  Exploring the atheist personality: well-being, awe, and magical thinking in atheists, Buddhists, and Christians , 2011 .

[33]  D. Gilbert How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[34]  Ulrich J. Frey Cognitive Foundations of Religiosity , 2009 .

[35]  D. Weakliem,et al.  Educational Attainment and Religiosity: Exploring Variations by Religious Tradition , 2011 .

[36]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Dual Processing in Reasoning , 2006, Psychological science.

[37]  S. Albrecht,et al.  Secularization, Higher Education, and Religiosity , 1984 .

[38]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[39]  Romin W. Tafarodi,et al.  You can't not believe everything you read. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Justin L. Barrett,et al.  Why Would Anyone Believe in God , 2004 .

[41]  D. Gilbert The assent of man: Mental representation and the control of belief. , 1993 .

[42]  M. Lindeman,et al.  Paranormal beliefs: their dimensionality and correlates , 2006 .

[43]  Tom W. Rice,et al.  Believe it or not: Religious and other paranormal beliefs in the United States , 2003 .

[44]  Alexander Bain,et al.  The Emotions and the Will , 1860, The British and foreign medico-chirurgical review.

[45]  Larry R. Petersen Education, homogamy, and religious commitment , 1994 .

[46]  J. Tobacyk,et al.  Belief in Paranormal Phenomena: Assessment Instrument Development and Implications for Personality Functioning , 1983 .

[47]  David Voas,et al.  Generations of Decline: Religious Change in 20th‐Century Britain , 2006 .

[48]  Stuart J. Ritchie,et al.  The relationship between intelligence and multiple domains of religious belief: Evidence from a large adult US sample , 2011 .

[49]  S. Epstein Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[50]  C. Foster,et al.  Intelligence and Paranormal Belief: Examining the Role of Context , 1998 .

[51]  W. C. Roof,et al.  The Religious Drop-Outs: Apostasy Among College Students. , 1979 .

[52]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Associative processes in intuitive judgment , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Dual processing in reasoning: two systems but one reasoner. , 2006, Psychological science.

[54]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[55]  C. Batson,et al.  Religion and the Individual: A Social-Psychological Perspective , 1993 .

[56]  M. Lindeman,et al.  Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model , 2007 .

[57]  L. Brown,et al.  Religious Socialization, Apostasy, and the Impact of Family Background , 1984 .

[58]  B. Beit-Hallahmi Atheists: A psychological profile. , 2006 .

[59]  M. Lindeman,et al.  Religious people and paranormal believers: Alike or different? , 2007 .

[60]  Rolf Uher,et al.  The International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) , 1989, Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch.

[61]  B. Pesta,et al.  The Wonderlic Personnel Test and elementary cognitive tasks as predictors of religious sectarianism, scriptural acceptance and religious questioning ☆ , 2009 .

[62]  Marjaana Lindeman,et al.  Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles , 2005 .

[63]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[64]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. , 1999 .

[65]  E. T. Lawson TOWARDS A COGNITIVE SCIENCE OF RELIGION , 2000 .

[66]  C. Reeve Expanding the g-nexus: Further evidence regarding the relations among national IQ, religiosity and national health outcomes , 2009 .

[67]  Giuseppe Plazzi,et al.  The Parasomnias and Other Sleep-Related Movement Disorders , 2010 .

[68]  Pascal Boyer,et al.  The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion , 1995 .

[69]  D. Sherkat Society Without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us about Contentment , 2011 .

[70]  A. D. Jones,et al.  Obedience to Authority , 1974 .

[71]  S. Guthrie,et al.  Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion , 1994 .

[72]  Patrick S. Malone,et al.  Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information , 1990 .

[73]  W. Schiefenhövel,et al.  The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior , 2009 .

[74]  B. Spinoza,et al.  The Ethics and Selected Letters , 1982 .

[75]  E. Larson,et al.  Leading scientists still reject God , 1998, Nature.

[76]  Robert M. Solow,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators 2000. Volume 1 , 2000 .

[77]  Ilkka Pyysiäinen,et al.  Current approaches in the cognitive science of religion , 2002 .