Priority Information Used for the Processing of Japanese Sentences: Thematic Roles, Case Particles or Grammatical Functions?

The present study investigated scrambling effects on the processing of Japanese sentences and priority information used among thematic roles, case particles and grammatical functions. Reaction times for correct sentence decisions were significantly prolonged for scrambled active sentences with transitive verbs in the first experiment and with ditransitive verbs in the second experiment. Errors were made with scrambled sentences more than canonical sentences in both experiments, which suggested that scrambling effects were apparent in active sentences. Passive sentences in the third experiment indicated that canonical order defined based on case particles, not thematic roles, was more quickly and accurately identified than scrambled order. Potential sentences in the fourth experiment and causative sentences in the fifth experiment indicated that the processing of scrambled sentences based on grammatical functions, but not on case particles, required longer reaction times and resulted in higher error rates than canonical sentences. Consequently, scrambling effects in the present study indicated that neither thematic roles nor case particles can provide fully-satisfactory information for canonical phrase order, and that only grammatical functions offer satisfactory information in all types of sentences.

[1]  Merrill F. Garrett,et al.  Sentence processing , 1990 .

[2]  Hajime Hoji,et al.  Weak crossover and move α in Japanese , 1983 .

[3]  Gert Webelhuth,et al.  Syntactic saturation phenomena and the modern Germanic languages , 1989 .

[4]  Natsuko Tsujimura,et al.  The handbook of Japanese linguistics , 2001 .

[5]  M. Saito.  Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications , 1985 .

[6]  Edson T. Miyamoto,et al.  Filler-Gap Dependencies in the Processing of Scrambling in Japanese , 2004 .

[7]  Hiroko Yamashita,et al.  The Effects of Word-Order and Case Marking Information on the Processing of Japanese , 1997 .

[8]  Edson T. Miyamoto,et al.  The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: Processing alternative word orders in Japanese , 2006 .

[9]  Naoki Fukui,et al.  DERIVING THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ENGLISH AND JAPANESE: A CASE STUDY IN PARAMETRIC SYNTAX , 1988 .

[10]  中山 峰治,et al.  Sentence processing in East Asian languages , 2002 .

[11]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[12]  G. Müller,et al.  Scrambling as Α-bar movement , 1994 .

[13]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[14]  Hiromu Sakai,et al.  The Effects of Phrase-Length Order and Scrambling in the Processing of Visually Presented Japanese Sentences , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  L. Frazier,et al.  Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch , 1989 .

[16]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser , 1989 .

[17]  Ann Kathleen Farmer,et al.  Modularity in Syntax: A Study of Japanese and English , 1984 .

[18]  T. Sakamoto,et al.  Processing Filler-gap Constructions in Japanese : The Case of Empty Subject Sentences , 2003 .

[19]  Hiroyuki Ura,et al.  Checking Theory and Dative Subject Constructions in Japanese and Korean , 1999 .

[20]  Anoop Mahajan,et al.  The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory , 1990 .

[21]  Naoki Fukui.  Theory of Projection in Syntax , 1995 .

[22]  Shigeru Miyagawa,et al.  Structure and case marking in Japanese , 1989 .

[23]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Active Filler Effects and Reanalysis: A Study of Japanese Wh-scrambling Constructions , 2002 .

[24]  Tim Smith,et al.  Sentence processing , 2004 .