Refueling the U.S. Innovation Economy: Fresh Approaches to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education

Innovation has powered America’s economy, creating good jobs and a high standard of living. Yet, the U.S. share of innovation-based industries is in decline, jeopardizing our status as the world’s innovation leader. And one reason is that the United States has been unable to produce enough of its own workers with sufficient skills in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). However, while there is increasing concern over how to increase STEM graduates, the prevailing approaches to solving the STEM challenge have not worked and are not likely to work. It is time for new approaches based on driving innovation in STEM education. This report discusses the limits of the prevailing approaches and outlines fresh approaches and specific policy recommendations to address America’s STEM challenge.

[1]  D. Istance.  Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , 1966, Nature.

[2]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Institutions' Expectations for Researchers' Self-Funding, Federal Grant Holding, and Private Industry Involvement: Manifold Drivers of Self-Interest and Researcher Behavior , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[3]  J. Schneider.  A Multivariate Study of Graduate Student Satisfaction and Other Outcomes Within Cooperative Research Centers , 2007 .

[4]  G. F. Zook.  Higher education for American democracy : a report of The President's Commission on Higher Education , 1947 .

[5]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the Effectiveness of the OLI Statistics Course in Accelerating Student Learning. , 2008 .

[6]  L. Katehi,et al.  Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. , 2009 .

[7]  Brianno Coller,et al.  Video Game-Based Education in Mechanical Engineering: A Look at Student Engagement* , 2009 .

[8]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[9]  Tim McDonald,et al.  The Role of Information Technology in Creating New Kinds of American High Schools , 2009 .

[10]  L. Darling-Hammond.  National Standards and Assessments: Will They Improve Education? , 1994, American Journal of Education.

[11]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach , 2006 .

[12]  John W. Thomas,et al.  A REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON PROJECT-BASED LEARNING , 2000 .

[13]  N. Augustine.  Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[14]  Lindsey A. Greene,et al.  EHP.net: The General Accounting Office , 2000 .

[15]  Thomas S. Dee,et al.  The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Student Achievement , 2009 .

[16]  E. Soloway,et al.  Enacting Project-Based Science , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  Chris Mooney,et al.  Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future , 2009 .

[18]  A. Dohm,et al.  Occupational Employment Projections to 2016 , 2007 .

[19]  D. Drew,et al.  The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 1971 , 1971 .

[20]  What is the influence of the National Science Education Standards? : reviewing the evidence, a workshop summary , 2003 .

[21]  Jo Boaler,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Teaching, Learning and Assessing Mathematics. , 1998 .

[22]  Randy Elliot Bennett,et al.  Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments. A Report from the NAEP Technology-Based Assessment Project, Research and Development Series. NCES 2007-466. , 2007 .

[23]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  Common sense concepts about motion , 1985 .

[24]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[25]  M. Alpers,et al.  Research and Development , 1960, Nature.

[26]  Lawrence R. Mishel,et al.  The Teaching Penalty: Teacher Pay Losing Ground , 2008 .

[27]  J. D. Fletcher.  Technology, the Columbus Effect, and the Third Revolution in Learning , 2001 .

[28]  R. Freeman.  Investing in the Best and Brightest: Increased Fellowship Support for American Scientists and Engineers. Discussion Paper 2006-09. , 2006 .

[29]  T. Sass,et al.  Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement , 2011 .

[30]  Fiona Goodchild.  The Pipeline: Still Leaking , 2004 .

[31]  Vivek Wadhwa,et al.  Anatomy of an Entrepreneur: Family Background and Motivation , 2009 .

[32]  R. Bennett,et al.  Innovation Policy on a Budget: Driving Innovation in a Time of Fiscal Constraint , 2010 .

[33]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[34]  M. Podgursky,et al.  Teacher recruitment and retention in public and private schools , 1998 .

[35]  Barnett Berry,et al.  Teaching Effectiveness and the Conditions that Matter Most in High-Needs Schools: A Policy Brief. , 2009 .

[36]  D. Baker.  Predictive value of attitude, cognitive ability, and personality to science achievement in the middle school , 1985 .

[37]  Peter A. Daempfle.  An Analysis of the High Attrition Rates among First Year College Science, Math, and Engineering Majors , 2003 .

[38]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[39]  Jay Parekh.  Do Median Grades Vary Across Departments , 2002 .

[40]  Merrilea Joyce Mayo.  Bringing Game-Based Learning to Scale: The Business Challenges of Serious Games , 2010 .

[41]  Teresa R. Behrens,et al.  Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome , 2001 .

[42]  Bruce Harding,et al.  Fostering Creative Thinking In Freshman Engineering , 1996 .

[43]  Sean E. Anderson.  Help wanted: the it workforce gap at the dawn of a new century , 1997 .

[44]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Are Foreign IT Workers Cheaper? U.S. Visa Policies and Compensation of Information Technology Professionals , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[45]  R. Sabot,et al.  GRADE INFLATION AND COURSE CHOICE , 1991 .

[46]  David H. Monk,et al.  Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement , 1994 .

[47]  Wayne Au,et al.  High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis , 2007 .

[48]  Ruben Rojas-Oviedo.  Improving Retention Of Undergraduate Students In Engineering Through Freshman Courses , 2002 .

[49]  Mark C. Detweiler,et al.  Training Concurrent Multistep Procedural Tasks , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[50]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[51]  G. Williger,et al.  National Science Foundation , 1962, American Antiquity.

[52]  J. Boaler.  Learning from Teaching: Exploring the Relationship between 'reform' Curriculum and Equity , 2022 .

[53]  Angela K. Fuller,et al.  Looking beyond research in doctoral education , 2005 .

[54]  J. Franklin.  An Overview of BLS Projections to 2016 , 2007 .

[55]  Erin Young.  What Makes a Great Teacher? , 2009 .

[56]  Richard B. Freeman,et al.  A Cobweb Model of the Supply and Starting Salary of New Engineers , 1976 .

[57]  H. Dekkers,et al.  Cross‐national differences in participating in tertiary science, technology, engineering and mathematics education , 2005 .

[58]  David Mioduser,et al.  The contribution of Project-based-learning to high-achievers’ acquisition of technological knowledge and skills , 2007 .

[59]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  Computer Gaming and Interactive Simulations for Learning: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[60]  Laurie Lewis,et al.  Distance Education Courses for Public Elementary and Secondary School Students. 2002-03. E.D. Tab. NCES 2005-010. , 2005 .

[61]  Tim,et al.  How Information Technology Can Enable 21st Century Schools. , 2009 .

[62]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns , 2008 .

[63]  Chris M. Golde,et al.  At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today's Doctoral Students Reveal about Doctoral Education. , 2001 .

[64]  Dan Goldhaber,et al.  The Mystery of Good Teaching , 2002 .

[65]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Digital Prosperity: Understanding the Economic Benefits of the Information Technology Revolution , 2007 .

[66]  Joy Teague,et al.  Personality type, career preference and implications for computer science recruitment and teaching , 1998, ACSE '98.

[67]  Robert Freeland,et al.  Retention in Engineering: A Study of Freshman Cohorts , 1992 .

[68]  Stephanie Pfirman,et al.  Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences , 2007 .

[69]  Z. Acs,et al.  High-Technology Immigrant Entrepreneurship in the U.S. , 2009 .

[70]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[71]  Hal Salzman,et al.  Into the Eye of the Storm: Assessing the Evidence on Science and Engineering Education, Quality, and Workforce Demand , 2007 .

[72]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection: Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading , 2001 .

[73]  M. Finn,et al.  Stay Rates of Foreign Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities, 2007 , 2010 .

[74]  D. F. Ward.  REMARKS OF THE PRESIDENT. , 1965, JAMA.

[75]  Division on Earth.  BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists , 2003 .

[76]  C. Goldin,et al.  Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of "Blind" Auditions on Female Musicians , 1997 .

[77]  Brian J. Caveney,et al.  Born Entrepreneurs, Born Leaders: How Your Genes Affect Your Work Life , 2011 .

[78]  Richard T. Snodgrass,et al.  Single- versus double-blind reviewing: an analysis of the literature , 2006, SGMD.

[79]  John Watson,et al.  Keeping Pace with K-12 Online Learning: An Annual Review of Policy and Practice, 2010. , 2010 .

[80]  P. Sobecky,et al.  Integrative graduate education and research traineeship: signals in the sea , 2008 .

[81]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists’ Participation in University Research Centers: What are the Gender Differences? , 2005 .

[82]  William R. Kerr,et al.  The Supply Side of Innovation: H‐1B Visa Reforms and U.S. Ethnic Invention , 2008, Journal of Labor Economics.

[83]  Robert D. Atkinson,et al.  Addressing the STEM Challenge by Expanding Specialty Math and Science High Schools. , 2007 .

[84]  Gina Saliba,et al.  Blended learning , 2010, BDJ.

[85]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Blending In The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States , 2007 .

[86]  John F. Kain,et al.  The Market for Teacher Quality. NBER Working Paper No. 11154. , 2005 .

[87]  S Quick,et al.  International data base. , 1984, POPIN bulletin.

[88]  Barbara Queen,et al.  Distance Education Courses for Public Elementary and Secondary School Students: 2009-10. First Look. NCES 2012-008. , 2011 .

[89]  P. Romer,et al.  Should the Government Subsidize Supply or Demand in the Market for Scientists and Engineers? , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[90]  Ethan Mollick,et al.  Changing the Game: How Video Games Are Transforming the Future of Business , 2008 .

[91]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform , 1983, CACM.

[92]  R. Atkinson,et al.  The Atlantic Century: Benchmarking EU & U.S. Innovation and Competitiveness , 2009 .

[93]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  The Condition of education , 1975 .

[94]  Michael K. Thomas,et al.  Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns , 2005 .

[95]  Caroline S. Wagner,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF KNOWLEDGE CREATION: A BASELINE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF THE ROLE AND CONTRIBUTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S NANOSCALE SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTERS , 2006 .

[96]  Hal Salzman,et al.  Steady as She Goes? Three Generations of Students through the Science and Engineering Pipeline , 2009 .

[97]  Charles E. Eesley,et al.  Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT , 2009 .

[98]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[99]  M. Goldschmid.  Prediction of college majors by personality tests. , 1967 .

[100]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  A Retrospective Look at the U.S. Productivity Growth Resurgence , 2007 .

[101]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Students As The Key To Unleashing Student Engagement: The Theory, Design, & Launch Of A Scalable, Student Run Learning Community At Xx , 2010 .

[102]  B. D. Coller,et al.  Effectiveness of using a video game to teach a course in mechanical engineering , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[103]  P. Griffiths,et al.  Reshaping the graduate education of scientists and engineers. , 1995, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[104]  H. Holzer.  America's Forgotten Middle-Skill Jobs: Education and Training Requirements in the Next Decade and Beyond , 2008 .

[105]  Julie A. Marsh,et al.  Chapter 2 Accountability and teaching practices: School-level actions and teacher responses , 2007 .

[106]  William Aspray,et al.  The Supply of Information Technology Workers in the United States. , 1999 .

[107]  M. Mayo.  Video Games: A Route to Large-Scale STEM Education? , 2009, Science.

[108]  J. Sylvester,et al.  Music and Mathematics , 1886, Nature.

[109]  M. Teitelbaum,et al.  Do We Need More Scientists , 2004 .

[110]  D. Brewer,et al.  Does Teacher Certification Matter? High School Teacher Certification Status and Student Achievement , 2000 .

[111]  Carlota Perez,et al.  The double bubble at the turn of the century: technological roots and structural implications , 2009 .

[112]  Brett E. Shelton,et al.  The Design and Use of Simulation Computer Games in Education , 2007 .

[113]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the clubhouse: the Carnegie Mellon experience , 2002, SGCS.

[114]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .