Improving transit demand management with Smart Card data : general framework and applications

Increases in ridership are outpacing capacity expansions in a number of transit systems. By shifting their focus to demand management, agencies can instead influence how customers use the system, getting more out of the capacity they already have. However, while demand management is well researched for personal vehicle use, its applications for public transportation are still emerging. This thesis explores the strategies transit agencies can use to reduce overcrowding, with a particular focus of how automatically collected fare data can support the design and evaluation of these measures. A framework for developing demand management policies is introduced to help guide agencies through this process. It includes establishing motivations for the program, aspects to consider in its design, as well as dimensions and metrics to evaluate its impacts. Additional considerations for updating a policy are also discussed, as are the possible data sources and methods for supporting analysis. This framework was applied to a fare incentive strategy implemented at Hong Kong’s MTR system. In addition to establishing existing congestion patterns, a customer classification analysis was performed to understand the typical travel patterns among MTR users. These results were used to evaluate the promotion at three levels of customer aggregation: all users, user groups, and a panel of high frequency travelers. The incentive was found to have small but non-negligible impacts on morning travel, particularly at the beginning of the peak hour and among users with commuter-like behavior. Through a change point analysis, it was possible to identify the panel members that responded to the promotion and quantify factors that influenced their decision using a discrete choice model. The findings of these analyses are used to recommend potential improvements to MTR’s current scheme. Thesis Supervisor: Jinhua Zhao Title: Edward H. and Joyce Linde Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Thesis Supervisor: Haris N. Koutsopoulos Title: Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Northeastern University

[1]  S. Fujii,et al.  Determinants of the effectiveness of travel feedback programs—a review of communicative mobility management measures for changing travel behaviour in Japan , 2006 .

[2]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[3]  R. Kitamura An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis , 1988 .

[4]  David Gaker,et al.  Experimental Economics in Transportation , 2010 .

[5]  Eran Ben-Elia,et al.  The combined effect of information and experience on drivers’ route-choice behavior , 2008 .

[6]  M. Meyer,et al.  Demand management as an element of transportation policy: using carrots and sticks to influence travel behavior , 1999 .

[7]  P. Charles,et al.  Rail patronage management: effectiveness in practice, and new theoretical frames , 2010 .

[8]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding , 2007, SODA '07.

[9]  M. Trépanier,et al.  Detection of Activities of Public Transport Users by Analyzing Smart Card Data , 2012 .

[10]  D. Kahneman Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[11]  Licia Capra,et al.  Mining Public Transport Usage for Personalised Intelligent Transport Systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[12]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Smart card data use in public transit: A literature review , 2011 .

[13]  J. Garvill,et al.  Expected car use reduction in response to structural travel demand management measures , 2010 .

[14]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  A Conceptual Analysis of the Impact of Travel Demand Management on Private Car Use , 2002 .

[15]  Gabriel Goulet-Langlois,et al.  Exploring regularity and structure in travel behavior using Smart Card data , 2015 .

[16]  Linda Steg,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ACCEPTABILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSPORT PRICING. IN: ACCEPTABILITY OF TRANSPORT PRICING STRATEGIES , 2003 .

[17]  B. Prabhakar,et al.  INSINC: A Platform for Managing Peak Demand in Public Transit , 2013 .

[18]  Liang Liu,et al.  Understanding individual and collective mobility patterns from smart card records: A case study in Shenzhen , 2009, 2009 12th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Soft Transport Policy Measures: Gaps in Knowledge , 2011 .

[20]  Graham Currie Exploring the impact of the ‘Free before 7’ campaign on reducing overcrowding on Melbourne’s trains , 2009 .

[21]  Meisy A. Ortega-Tong Classification of London's public transport users using smart card data , 2013 .

[22]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[23]  Bernhard Schlag,et al.  PUBLIC ACCEPTABILITY OF TRANSPORT PRICING , 1997 .

[24]  Bruno Agard,et al.  MINING PUBLIC TRANSPORT USER BEHAVIOUR FROM SMART CARD DATA , 2006 .

[25]  T. Litman Victoria Transport Policy Institute , 2004 .

[26]  Phil Blythe,et al.  IMPROVING PUBLIC TRANSPORT TICKETING THROUGH SMART CARDS , 2004 .

[27]  S. Managi,et al.  How does commuting behavior change due to incentives? An empirical study of the Beijing Subway System , 2014, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[28]  Peter Loukopoulos,et al.  A Classification of Travel Demand Management Measures , 2007 .

[29]  T. Gärling,et al.  Behaviour Theory and Soft Transport Policy Measures , 2011 .

[30]  Keith Sloan,et al.  A review of policy and economic instruments for peak demand management in commuter rail , 2010 .

[31]  Eran Ben-Elia,et al.  Changing commuters' behavior using rewards: a study of rush-hour avoidance , 2011 .

[32]  Licia Capra,et al.  How smart is your smartcard?: measuring travel behaviours, perceptions, and incentives , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[33]  Keith Sloan,et al.  Modelling the ability of fare to spread AM peak passenger loads using rooftops , 2011 .

[34]  L. Steg,et al.  Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm , 2010 .

[35]  Christopher B. Barrett Travel Demand Management , 2015 .

[36]  A. Sumalee,et al.  Efficiency and equity comparison of cordon- and area-based road pricing schemes using a trip-chain equilibrium model , 2007 .

[37]  J. Schade,et al.  Acceptability of Urban Transport Pricing , 2000 .

[38]  Y. Croissant Estimation of multinomial logit models in R : The mlogit Package , 2010 .

[39]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity‐based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems , 1992 .

[40]  T. Gärling,et al.  Travel Demand Management Targeting Reduced Private Car Use: Effectiveness, Public Acceptability and Political Feasibility , 2007 .

[41]  N. Fearnley Inventive Pricing of Urban Public Transport , 2003 .

[42]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[43]  Phil Charles,et al.  Developments in transit fare policy reform , 2006 .

[44]  P. Dolan,et al.  Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way , 2012 .

[45]  C G Bamford,et al.  The use of association analysis in market segmentation for public transport: a case study of bus passengers in West Yorkshire, UK , 1987 .

[46]  Si‐ming Li,et al.  The effectiveness of differential pricing on route choice , 1994 .

[47]  J. Elíasson A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system , 2009 .

[48]  R. Cervero Transit pricing research , 1990 .

[49]  J. Garvill,et al.  Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness , 2006 .

[50]  Graham Currie,et al.  Design and impact of a scheme to spread peak rail demand using pre-peak free fares , 2011 .

[51]  Gerard Whelan,et al.  Modelling the impact of alternative fare structures on train overcrowding , 2004 .

[52]  C.A.J. Vlek,et al.  The role of problem awareness in willingness-to-change car use and in evaluating relevant policy measures , 1997 .

[53]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .

[54]  Louise Eriksson,et al.  Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs , 2008 .

[55]  Phil Charles,et al.  Spreading peak demand for urban rail transit through differential fare policy : a review of empirical evidence , 2013 .

[56]  Keith Sloan,et al.  Surveying Sydney rail commuters’ willingness to change travel time , 2011 .

[57]  Le Minh Kieu,et al.  Transit passenger segmentation using travel regularity mined from Smart Card transactions data , 2014 .

[58]  Rebecca Elmore-Yalch,et al.  A HANDBOOK: USING MARKET SEGMENTATION TO INCREASE TRANSIT RIDERSHIP , 1998 .

[59]  J. Schade,et al.  Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies , 2003 .

[60]  Alexander Erath,et al.  Use of Public Transport Smart Card Fare Payment Data for Travel Behaviour Analysis in Singapore , 2011 .

[61]  Jinhua Zhao,et al.  'Nudging' Active Travel: A Framework for Behavioral Interventions Using Mobile Technology , 2014 .

[62]  E. Avineri On the use and potential of behavioural economics from the perspective of transport and climate change , 2012 .