Distinction Bias: Misprediction and Mischoice Due to Joint Evaluation

This research identifies a new source of failure to make accurate affective predictions or to make experientially optimal choices. When people make predictions or choices, they are often in the joint evaluation (JE) mode; when people actually experience an event, they are often in the single evaluation (SE) mode. The "utility function" of an attribute can vary systematically between SE and JE. When people in JE make predictions or choices for events to be experienced in SE, they often resort to their JE preferences rather than their SE preferences and overpredict the difference that different values of an attribute (e.g., different salaries) will make to their happiness in SE. This overprediction is referred to as the distinction bias. The present research also specifies when the distinction bias occurs and when it does not. This research contributes to literatures on experienced utility, affective forecasting, and happiness.

[1]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues , 1999 .

[3]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .

[4]  James G. March,et al.  A primer on decision making : how decisions happen , 1994 .

[5]  I. Simonson The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 1990 .

[6]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Miswanting: Some Problems in the Forecasting of Future Affective States , 2000 .

[7]  Nathan Novemsky,et al.  The Time Course and Impact of Consumers' Erroneous Beliefs about Hedonic Contrast Effects , 2003 .

[8]  B. V. Praag,et al.  The Connexion between Old and New Approaches to Financial Satisfaction , 2004 .

[9]  Daniel Kahneman New challenges to the rationality assumption , 1994 .

[10]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Location, Location, Location: The Misprediction of Satisfaction in Housing Lotteries , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  S. Sherman On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. , 1980 .

[12]  Don N. Kleinmuntz,et al.  Information Displays and Decision Processes , 1993 .

[13]  A. B. Sørensen,et al.  Life events and psychological well-being: A reexamination of theoretical and methodological issues , 1984 .

[14]  E. Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[15]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons , 2000 .

[16]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives , 1992 .

[17]  Martijn C. Willemsen,et al.  The role of negative features in joint and separate evaluation , 2004 .

[18]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Wouldn't it be nice? Predicting future feelings. , 1999 .

[19]  R. Easterlin Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory , 2001 .

[20]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  B. Frey,et al.  Happiness, Economy and Institutions , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. , 1999 .

[23]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Internal and Substantive Inconsistencies in Decision-Making , 2006 .

[24]  K R Hammond,et al.  How Convergence of Research Paradigms Can Improve Research on Diagnostic Judgment , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[25]  David Laibson,et al.  Experienced Utility and Objective Happiness: A Moment-Based Approach , 2001 .

[26]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Predicting a changing taste: Do people know what they will like? , 1992 .

[27]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Social Influence by Requesting Self-Prophecy , 1999 .

[28]  G. Loewenstein Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior , 1996 .

[29]  Martijn C. Willemsen,et al.  Negative-based prominence: the role of negative features in matching and choice , 2002 .

[30]  Julie R. Irwin,et al.  Buying/Selling Price Preference Reversals: Preference for Environmental Changes in Buying Versus Selling Modes , 1994 .

[31]  P. Brickman,et al.  Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[33]  Keith D. Markman,et al.  Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. , 1995 .

[34]  E. Deci,et al.  On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Medium Maximization , 2003 .

[36]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Cancellation and focus: the role of shared and unique features in the choice process , 1995 .

[37]  D. Kahneman Varieties of counterfactual thinking. , 1995 .

[38]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Goal-Based Construction of Preferences: Task Goals and the Prominence Effect , 1999 .

[39]  Claudia González-Vallejo,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis Revisited: Joint and Separate Evaluation Preference Reversal as a Function of Attribute Importance , 2001 .

[40]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[41]  R. Easterlin Building a Better Theory of Well-Being , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[42]  B. Frey,et al.  What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research? , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[43]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Comparison Effects on Preference Construction , 1999 .

[44]  Christopher K. Hsee Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options , 1998 .

[45]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  A. Tversky Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[47]  M. Seligman Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment , 2002 .

[48]  P. Salovey,et al.  The wisdom in feeling: psychological processes in emotional intelligence , 2002 .

[49]  Amartya Sen,et al.  INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF CHOICE , 1993 .

[50]  H. Hoff [The psychology of aging]. , 1962, Hippokrates.

[51]  D. Myers The Pursuit of Happiness: Who Is Happy - and Why? , 1993 .

[52]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude object , 1989 .

[54]  D. Read,et al.  Predicting Hunger: The Effects of Appetite and Delay on Choice. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[55]  J. Forgas Feeling and thinking : the role of affect in social cognition , 2000 .

[56]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Back to Bentham? Explorations of experience utility , 1997 .

[57]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology , 1999 .

[58]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[59]  F. Feinberg,et al.  How Does Choice Affect Evaluations , 2002 .

[60]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Does Living in California Make People Happy? A Focusing Illusion in Judgments of Life Satisfaction , 1998 .

[61]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Predictably Incoherent Judgments , 2002 .

[62]  Robert H. Frank,et al.  The Frame of Reference as a Public Good , 1997 .

[63]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Positive psychology. An introduction. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[64]  R. Easterlin Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence , 1974 .

[65]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The trouble with Vronsky: Impact bias in the forecasting of future affective states. , 2002 .

[66]  N. Roese,et al.  What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking , 1995 .

[67]  SOCIAL PREDICTION AND THE "ALLEGIANCE BIAS" , 2002 .

[68]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Lay Rationalism and Inconsistency between Predicted Experience and Decision , 2003 .

[69]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The Future Is Now: Temporal Correction in Affective Forecasting☆ , 2002 .

[70]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  A Fundamental Prediction Error: Self-Others Discrepancies in Risk Preference , 1997 .

[71]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics , 1986 .

[72]  Christopher K. Hsee Attribute Evaluability and its Implications for Joint-Separate Evaluation Reversals and Beyond , 2006 .

[73]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[74]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Affective Forecasting , 2005 .

[75]  N. Roese Counterfactual thinking. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[76]  D. Moore,et al.  Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[77]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Subjective Weil-Being: Three Decades of Progress , 2004 .

[78]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Happiness and economics , 2001 .

[79]  B. Mellers,et al.  Preferences, prices, and ratings in risky decision making. , 1992 .