Predicting the reactivity of ambidentate nucleophiles and electrophiles using a single, general-purpose, reactivity indicator.

We recently proposed a new reactivity indicator, termed the "general-purpose reactivity indicator", Xi, which describes not only the classical reactivity paradigms, but also describes reactions that are neither frontier-orbital nor electrostatically controlled. This indicator was proposed to be especially useful for reactants with multiple reactive sites, especially if the nature of the reactivity at those sites was different. This suggests that this reactivity indicator is especially appropriate for ambidentate molecules; this paper confirms this hypothesis. The general-purpose reactivity indicator not only identifies the most reactive sites, it also identifies which substrates prefer which reactive sites. In particular, the reactivity indicator allows one to clearly distinguish which sites of an ambidentate molecule are most reactive when electron transfer from the attacking reagent is large (a soft reagent) and which sites are most reactive when the attacking reagent is hard and highly charged (so that electron transfer is relatively insignificant). To illustrate the efficacy of the indicator for nucleophiles we consider SCN(-), SeCN(-), NO(2)(-), SO(3)(2-). For electrophiles we consider dimethyl carbonate, N-methyl-N-nitrosotoluene-p-sulfonamide (MNTS), and 1-chloro-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene (CNB).

[1]  J. V. Ortiz,et al.  The electron-propagator approach to conceptual density-functional theory , 2005 .

[2]  Ralph G. Pearson,et al.  Recent advances in the concept of hard and soft acids and bases , 1987 .

[3]  P. Ayers.  Strategies for computing chemical reactivity indices , 2001 .

[4]  A. Becke.  A New Mixing of Hartree-Fock and Local Density-Functional Theories , 1993 .

[5]  James S. M. Anderson,et al.  Conceptual Density-Functional Theory for General Chemical Reactions, Including Those That Are Neither Charge- nor Frontier-Orbital-Controlled. 2. Application to Molecules Where Frontier Molecular Orbital Theory Fails. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[6]  Yang,et al.  Degenerate ground states and a fractional number of electrons in density and reduced density matrix functional theory , 2000, Physical review letters.

[7]  Robert G. Parr,et al.  Density Functional Theory of Electronic Structure , 1996 .

[8]  P. Ayers.  The physical basis of the hard/soft acid/base principle. , 2007, Faraday discussions.

[9]  P. Ayers,et al.  Perspective on “Density functional approach to the frontier-electron theory of chemical reactivity” , 2000 .

[10]  R. Parr,et al.  Density-functional theory of the electronic structure of molecules. , 1995, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[11]  L. Domingo,et al.  Towards an intrinsic nucleofugality scale: The leaving group (LG) ability in CH3LG model system , 2006 .

[12]  Ralph G. Pearson,et al.  HARD AND SOFT ACIDS AND BASES , 1963 .

[13]  Weitao Yang,et al.  The use of global and local molecular parameters for the analysis of the gas-phase basicity of amines. , 1986, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  J. R. Leis,et al.  Nucleophilic reactivity towards ‘normal’ and ambidentate electrophiles bearing the nitroso group , 1995 .

[15]  R. Parr,et al.  Electronegativity: The density functional viewpoint , 1978 .

[16]  Görling,et al.  Exact Kohn-Sham scheme based on perturbation theory. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[17]  Robert G. Parr,et al.  Variational Principles for Describing Chemical Reactions: The Fukui Function and Chemical Hardness Revisited , 2000 .

[18]  James S. M. Anderson,et al.  Perturbative perspectives on the chemical reaction prediction problem , 2005 .

[19]  P W Ayers,et al.  Variational principles for describing chemical reactions. Reactivity indices based on the external potential. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  R. C. Morrison,et al.  Variational principles for describing chemical reactions: Condensed reactivity indices , 2002 .

[21]  Robert G. Parr,et al.  Density functional approach to the frontier-electron theory of chemical reactivity , 1984 .

[22]  R. Parr,et al.  Elucidating the hard/soft acid/base principle: a perspective based on half-reactions. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[23]  James S. M. Anderson,et al.  Conceptual Density-Functional Theory for General Chemical Reactions, Including Those That Are Neither Charge- nor Frontier-Orbital-Controlled. 1. Theory and Derivation of a General-Purpose Reactivity Indicator. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  P. Fuentealba,et al.  Homofugality: A new reactivity index describing the leaving group ability in homolytic substitution reactions , 2006 .

[25]  So Hirata,et al.  Ab initio density functional theory: OEP-MBPT(2). A new orbital-dependent correlation functional , 2002 .

[26]  Henry Chermette,et al.  Chemical reactivity indexes in density functional theory , 1999 .

[27]  Jeremy N. S. Evans,et al.  The Fukui Function: A Key Concept Linking Frontier Molecular Orbital Theory and the Hard-Soft-Acid-Base Principle , 1995 .

[28]  Renato Pucci,et al.  Electron density, Kohn−Sham frontier orbitals, and Fukui functions , 1984 .

[29]  R. Parr,et al.  Principle of maximum hardness , 1991 .

[30]  Martin Head-Gordon,et al.  Quantum chemistry and molecular processes , 1996 .

[31]  Giovanni Scalmani,et al.  New developments in the polarizable continuum model for quantum mechanical and classical calculations on molecules in solution , 2002 .

[32]  G. Klopman,et al.  Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions , 1968 .

[33]  James S. M. Anderson,et al.  Indices for predicting the quality of leaving groups. , 2005, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[34]  C. Breneman,et al.  Determining atom‐centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis , 1990 .

[35]  P. Ayers.  An elementary derivation of the hard/soft-acid/base principle. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[36]  J. Perdew,et al.  Density-Functional Theory for Fractional Particle Number: Derivative Discontinuities of the Energy , 1982 .

[37]  Weitao Yang,et al.  Orbital-dependent correlation energy in density-functional theory based on a second-order perturbation approach: success and failure. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[38]  P. Ayers,et al.  An example where orbital relaxation is an important contribution to the Fukui function. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[39]  Parr,et al.  Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. , 1988, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[40]  Francisco Méndez,et al.  Chemical Reactivity of Enolate Ions: The Local Hard and Soft Acids and Bases Principle Viewpoint , 1994 .

[41]  John A. Pople,et al.  Nobel Lecture: Quantum chemical models , 1999 .

[42]  L. Rossi,et al.  Dimethyl carbonate as an ambident electrophile. , 2005, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[43]  P. Geerlings,et al.  Conceptual density functional theory. , 2003, Chemical reviews.

[44]  P. Ayers.  The dependence on and continuity of the energy and other molecular properties with respect to the number of electrons , 2008 .

[45]  L. Righi,et al.  Reactions of Hydroxypyridines with 1‐Chloro‐2,4,6‐trinitrobenzene − Product Structure, Kinetics, and Tautomerism , 2001 .