Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses

A survey of pre/post-test data using the Halloun–Hestenes Mechanics Diagnostic test or more recent Force Concept Inventory is reported for 62 introductory physics courses enrolling a total number of students N=6542. A consistent analysis over diverse student populations in high schools, colleges, and universities is obtained if a rough measure of the average effectiveness of a course in promoting conceptual understanding is taken to be the average normalized gain 〈g〉. The latter is defined as the ratio of the actual average gain (%〈post〉−%〈pre〉) to the maximum possible average gain (100−%〈pre〉). Fourteen “traditional” (T) courses (N=2084) which made little or no use of interactive-engagement (IE) methods achieved an average gain 〈g〉T-ave=0.23±0.04 (std dev). In sharp contrast, 48 courses (N=4458) which made substantial use of IE methods achieved an average gain 〈g〉IE-ave=0.48±0.14 (std dev), almost two standard deviations of 〈g〉IE-ave above that of the traditional courses. Results for 30 (N=3259) of the a...

[1]  S. Sarason.  Revisiting "The culture of the school and the problem of change" , 1971 .

[2]  David Hestenes,et al.  Wherefore a science of teaching , 1979 .

[3]  J. Clement.  Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[4]  L. McDermott.  Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics , 1984 .

[5]  B. Bloom.  The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[6]  "A Nation at Risk" Revisited. , 1984 .

[7]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[8]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  Modeling instruction in mechanics , 1987 .

[9]  Richard R. Hake.  Promoting student crossover to the Newtonian world , 1987 .

[10]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  The third revolution in computers and education , 1987 .

[11]  Sheila Tobias,et al.  Professors as physics students: What can they teach us? , 1988 .

[12]  Jose P. Mestre,et al.  Cognitive research‐what’s in if for physics teachers? , 1989 .

[13]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools , 1990 .

[14]  S. Sarason.  The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform , 1990 .

[15]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  A perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences: The need for special science courses for teachers , 1990 .

[16]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching , 1990 .

[17]  Clifford E. Swartz.  The Physicists Intervene , 1991 .

[18]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—Closing the gap , 1991 .

[19]  A. V. Heuvelen,et al.  Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research‐based instructional strategies , 1991 .

[20]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity , 1991 .

[21]  My Conversion to the Arons‐Advocated Method of science Education , 1991 .

[22]  Testing physics achievement: Trends over time and place , 1991 .

[23]  D. Hestenes,et al.  A mechanics baseline test , 1992 .

[24]  Science Education Reform: What's Wrong with the Process?. , 1992 .

[25]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving , 1992 .

[26]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups , 1992 .

[27]  Eric Mazur.  Qualitative vs. quantitative thinking: Are we teaching the right thing? , 1992 .

[28]  Guest Comment: Science education reform: What’s wrong with the process? , 1992 .

[29]  D. Hestenes.  Modeling games in the Newtonian World , 1992 .

[30]  D. F. Holcomb,et al.  The Introductory University Physics Project , 1993 .

[31]  Using ‘‘dialogue’’ labs in a community‐college physics course , 1993 .

[32]  A. Arons.  Uses of the past: Reflections on United States physics curriculum development 1955 to 1990 , 1993 .

[33]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  Research as a guide for teaching introductory mechanics: An illustration in the context of the Atwood’s machine , 1994 .

[34]  Albert A. Bartlett,et al.  Reflections on sustainability, population growth, and the environment , 1994 .

[35]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[36]  Public Support of Science: Searching for Harmony , 1994 .

[37]  George E. Brown,et al.  New Ways of Looking at US Science and Technology , 1994 .

[38]  How personality profiling can change your life , 1994 .

[39]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics , 1994 .

[40]  G. Mann.  The Quark and the Jaguar: adventures in the simple and the complex , 1994 .

[41]  M. Gell-Mann.  A Theory of Everything. (Book Reviews: The Quark and the Jaguar. Adventures in the Simple and the Complex.) , 1994 .

[42]  Beth Thacker,et al.  Comparing problem solving performance of physics students in inquiry‐based and traditional introductory physics courses , 1994 .

[43]  Is Physics Education Adapting to a Changing World , 1994 .

[44]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller , 1995 .

[45]  David Hestenes,et al.  A modeling method for high school physics instruction , 1995 .

[46]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes , 1995 .

[47]  Douglas Huffman,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A reply to Hestenes and Halloun , 1995 .

[48]  Douglas Huffman,et al.  What does the force concept inventory actually measure , 1995 .

[49]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes , 1995 .

[50]  Arnold B. Arons.  Generalizations to be Drawn from Results of Research on Teaching and Learning , 1995 .

[51]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Promoting interactivity in physics lecture classes , 1996 .

[52]  A. L. Ellermeijer,et al.  Teaching Mechanics Through Interactive Video and a Microcomputer-Based Laboratory , 1996 .

[53]  Frederick Reif.  Guest Comment: Standards and measurements in physics—Why not in physics education? , 1996 .

[54]  David Hammer,et al.  More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research , 1996 .

[55]  The IUPP evaluation: What we were trying to learn and how we were trying to learn it , 1996 .

[56]  H. Perkin,et al.  The Third Revolution , 1996 .

[57]  Sheila Tobias.  “Science-trained professionals”—A new breed for the new century , 1996 .

[58]  Development of multiple-choice test items , 1996 .

[59]  P. W. Laws,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1996: Promoting active learning based on physics education research in introductory physics courses , 1997 .

[60]  Guest Comment: Revitalizing undergraduate physics—Who needs it? , 1997 .

[61]  L. Clearihan.  The third revolution. , 1998, Australian family physician.