Making Subject Matter Part of the Equation: The Intersection of Policy and Content. An Occasional Paper. Document O-04-1.

[1]  A. Schutz.  Thou and I , 1996 .

[2]  Susan H. Fuhrman.  From the capitol to the classroom : standards-based reform in the states , 2001 .

[3]  B. Stecher,et al.  School and Classroom Practices during Two Years of Education Reform in Washington State. CSE Technical Report. , 2001 .

[4]  Grace Taylor,et al.  A Survey of Teachers' Perspectives on High-Stakes Testing in Colorado: What Gets Taught, What Gets Lost , 2002 .

[5]  N. Jennings.  Interpreting Policy in Real Classrooms: Case Studies of State Reform and Teacher Practice , 1996 .

[6]  Michael S. Knapp,et al.  Teaching for Meaning in High-Poverty Classrooms , 1995 .

[7]  Michael S. Knapp,et al.  Between Systemic Reforms and the Mathematics and Science Classroom: The Dynamics of Innovation, Implementation, and Professional Learning , 1997 .

[8]  Nancy A. Place.  Policy in action: the influence of mandated early reading assessment on teachers' thinking and practice , 2000 .

[9]  J. Brophy.  Teacher behavior and student achievement , 1984 .

[10]  J. Talbert,et al.  Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching , 2001 .

[11]  S. Ball.  The Micro-Politics of the School: Towards a Theory of School Organization , 1990 .

[12]  Marshall S. Smith,et al.  Systemic school reform , 1990 .

[13]  P. Grossman,et al.  On the Trail of the Omnibeast: Evaluating Omnibus Education Reforms in the 1980s , 1986 .

[14]  Pam Grossman,et al.  Changing Students, Changing Teaching. , 2000 .

[15]  D. Cohen,et al.  Learning Policy: When State Education Reform Works , 2001 .

[16]  John R. Schwille,et al.  Teachers as Policy Brokers in the Content of Elementary School Mathematics. Research Series No. 113. , 1982 .

[17]  B. Malen,et al.  Rethinking the multiple perspectives approach to education policy analysis: implications for policy‐practice connections , 1997 .

[18]  Pam Grossman,et al.  Considerations of Content and the Circumstances of Secondary School Teaching , 1994 .

[19]  Chrysan Gallucci,et al.  Communities of Practice and the Mediation of Teachers' Responses to Standards-based Reform. , 2003 .

[20]  Michael S. Knapp,et al.  Chapter 4:Professional Development as a Policy Pathway , 2003 .

[21]  S. Stodolsky.  The Subject Matters: Classroom Activity in Math and Social Studies , 1988 .

[22]  Susan S. Stodolsky,et al.  The Impact of Subject Matter on Curricular Activity: An Analysis of Five Academic Subjects , 1995 .

[23]  Michael T. Battista,et al.  Teacher Beliefs and the Reform Movement in Mathematics Education. , 1994 .

[24]  S. Stodolsky,et al.  Student Views About Learning Math and Social Studies , 1991 .

[25]  D. Angus,et al.  The Failed Promise of the American High School, 1890-1995 , 1999 .

[26]  G. Petersen.  Demonstrated Actions of Instructional Leaders: An Examination of Five California Superintendents , 1999 .

[27]  B. Nelson.  Building New Knowledge by Thinking: How Administrators Can Learn What They Need To Know about Mathematics Education Reform. , 1999 .

[28]  Leslie Santee Siskin.  Realms Of Knowledge: Academic Departments In Secondary Schools , 1994 .

[29]  S. Stodolsky,et al.  Content as Context: The Role of School Subjects in Secondary School Teaching , 1995 .

[30]  R. Heck,et al.  Reassessing the Principal's Role in School Effectiveness: A Review of Empirical Research, 1980-1995 , 1996 .

[31]  Leslie Santee Siskin,et al.  The Subjects in Question: Departmental Organization and the High School. The Series on School Reform. , 1995 .