Reward-Based Transfer From Bottom-Up to Top-Down Search Tasks

Recent evidence has suggested that reward modulates bottom-up and top-down attentional selection and that this effect persists within the same task even when reward is no longer offered. It remains unclear whether reward effects transfer across tasks, especially those engaging different modes of attention. We directly investigated whether reward-based contingency learned in a bottom-up search task was transferred to a subsequent top-down search task, and probed the nature of the transfer mechanism. Results showed that a reward-related benefit established in a pop-out-search task was transferred to a conjunction-search task, increasing participants’ efficiency at searching for targets previously associated with a higher level of reward. Reward history influenced search efficiency by enhancing both target salience and distractor filtering, depending on whether the target and distractors shared a critical feature. These results provide evidence for reward-based transfer between different modes of attention and strongly suggest that an integrated priority map based on reward information guides both top-down and bottom-up attention.

[1]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  John T Serences,et al.  Value-Based Modulations in Human Visual Cortex , 2008, Neuron.

[3]  J. Gottlieb From Thought to Action: The Parietal Cortex as a Bridge between Perception, Action, and Cognition , 2007, Neuron.

[4]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Visual Selective Attention and the Effects of Monetary Rewards , 2006, Psychological science.

[9]  W. Newsome,et al.  Matching Behavior and the Representation of Value in the Parietal Cortex , 2004, Science.

[10]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Learning to Attend and to Ignore Is a Matter of Gains and Losses , 2009, Psychological science.

[12]  S. Shomstein,et al.  The Differential Effects of Reward on Space- and Object-Based Attentional Allocation , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attentional guidance: investigating the role of the dorsal and ventral parietal cortices , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .

[15]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Saccades, salience and attention: the role of the lateral intraparietal area in visual behavior. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[16]  Puiu F. Balan,et al.  Attention as a decision in information space , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Optimal reward harvesting in complex perceptual environments , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture , 2011, PloS one.

[19]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reward Priority of Visual Target Singletons Modulates Event-Related Potential Signatures of Attentional Selection , 2009, Psychological science.

[20]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  J. Gallant,et al.  Goal-Related Activity in V4 during Free Viewing Visual Search Evidence for a Ventral Stream Visual Salience Map , 2003, Neuron.

[24]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[25]  Jon Driver,et al.  Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[26]  H. Nothdurft The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues , 1993, Vision Research.

[27]  Michael L. Platt,et al.  Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[28]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.