Technology-Rich Inquiry Science in Urban Classrooms: What are the Barriers to Inquiry Pedagogy?

What are the barriers to technology-rich inquiry pedagogy in urban science classrooms, and what kinds of programs and support structures allow these barriers to be overcome? Research on the pedagogical practices within urban classrooms suggests that as a result of many constraints, many urban teachers' practices emphasize directive, controlling teaching, that is, the ''pedagogy of poverty'' (Haberman, 1991), rather than the facilitation of students' ownership and control over their learning, as advocated in inquiry science. On balance, research programs that advocate standards-based or inquiry teaching pedagogies demonstrate strong learning outcomes by urban students. This study tracked classroom research on a technology-rich inquiry weather program with six urban science teachers. The teachers implemented this program in coordination with a district-wide middle school science reform. Results indicated that despite many challenges in the first year of implementation, students in all 19 classrooms of this program demonstrated significant content and inquiry gains. In addition, case study data comprised of twice-weekly classroom observations and interviews with the six teachers suggest support structures that were both conducive and challenging to inquiry pedagogy. Our work has extended previous studies on urban science pedagogy and practices as it has begun to articulate what role the technological component plays either in contributing to the challenges we experienced or in helping urban science classrooms to realize inquiry science and other positive learning values. Although these data outline results after only the first year of systemic reform, we suggest that they begin to build evidence for the role of technology-rich inquiry programs in combating the pedagogy of poverty in urban science classrooms. fl 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 128-150, 2002

[1]  Samuel Richmond Report to the President on the Use of Technology to Strengthen K-12 Education in the United States , 1998 .

[2]  E. Emmer Academic activities and tasks in first-year teachers' classes , 1986 .

[3]  M. Chi Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[4]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[5]  Seymour Papert Tinkering Towards Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform (book) , 1997 .

[6]  H. Becker Who's wired and who's not: children's access to and use of computer technology. , 2000, The Future of children.

[7]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[8]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[9]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[10]  Larry Cuban,et al.  The Lure of Curricular Reform and Its Pitiful History , 1993 .

[11]  M. Covington,et al.  Teaching strategies that honor and motivate inner-city African–American students: A school/university collaboration , 1998 .

[12]  Nancy Butler Songer,et al.  Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms: A case of kids as global scientists. , 1996 .

[13]  M. Linn,et al.  Beyond Fourth-Grade Science: Why Do U.S. and Japanese Students Diverge? , 2000 .

[14]  Carol V. Lloyd The elaboration of concepts in three biology textbooks: Facilitating student learning , 1990 .

[15]  Nancy Butler Songer,et al.  Can Technology Bring Students Closer to Science , 1998 .

[16]  H. Becker,et al.  Teacher Professional Engagement and Constructivist-Compatible Computer Use , 2000 .

[17]  Denis Newman,et al.  The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School , 1989 .

[18]  Kathryn Scantlebury,et al.  Urban african-american middle school science students : Does standards-based teaching make a difference? , 2000 .

[19]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[20]  Ann E. Schlosser,et al.  The Evolution of the Digital Divide , 2000 .

[21]  R. Slavin Scaling Up: Lessons Learned in the Dissemination of Success for All. , 1994 .

[22]  A. Barton Reframing "Science for all" through the Politics of Poverty , 1998 .

[23]  Michael S. Knapp,et al.  Between Systemic Reforms and the Mathematics and Science Classroom: The Dynamics of Innovation, Implementation, and Professional Learning , 1997 .

[24]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools , 2000 .

[25]  A. Collins National Science Education Standards: A Political Document. , 1998 .

[26]  Mary M. Atwater,et al.  A study of urban middle school students with high and low attitudes toward science , 1995 .

[27]  Linda Darling-Hammond,et al.  The Right to Learn and the Advancement of Teaching: Research, Policy, and Practice for Democratic Education , 1996 .

[28]  Ann E. Schlosser,et al.  The evolution of the digital divide: examining the relationship of race to internet access and usage over time , 2001 .

[29]  Maris A. Vinovskis,et al.  An Analysis of the Concept and Uses of Systemic Educational Reform , 1996 .