Transient effects of harsh luminous conditions on the visual performance of aviators in a civil aircraft cockpit.

The aim of this work was to examine how harsh luminous conditions in a cockpit, such as lightning in a thunderstorm or direct sunlight immediately after an aircraft passes through clouds, may affect the visual performance of pilots, and how to improve it. Such lighting conditions can result in the temporary visual impairment of aviators, which may greatly increase the risk of accidents. Tests were carried out in a full-scale simulator cockpit in which two kinds of dynamic lighting scenes, namely pulse changed and step changed lighting, were used to represent harsh luminous conditions. Visual acuity (VA), reaction time (RT) and identification accuracy (IA) were recorded as dependent variables. Data analysis results indicate that standardized VA values decreased significantly in both pulsing and step conditions in comparison with the dark condition. Standardized RT values increased significantly in the step condition; on the contrary, less reaction time was observed in the pulsing condition. Such effects could be reduced by an ambient illumination provided by a fluorescent lamp in both conditions. The results are to be used as a principle for optimizing lighting design with a thunderstorm light.

[1]  V. B. Nakagawara,et al.  Natural sunlight and its association to civil aviation accidents. , 2004, Optometry.

[2]  I. L. Bailey,et al.  Large area glare sources and their effect on visual discomfort and visual performance at computer workstations , 1992, Conference Record of the 1992 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[3]  An-Hsiang Wang,et al.  Effects of polarity and luminance contrast on visual performance and VDT display quality , 2000 .

[4]  K. Oberauer,et al.  The integration of familiarity and recollection information in short-term recognition: modeling speed-accuracy trade-off functions , 2008, Psychological research.

[5]  Yandan Lin,et al.  The effect of spectrum on visual field in road lighting , 2004 .

[6]  Van B Nakagawara,et al.  Aircraft accidents and incidents associated with visual effects from bright light exposures during low-light flight operations. , 2007, Optometry.

[7]  S P Rogers,et al.  Luminance and luminance contrast requirements for legibility of self-luminous displays in aircraft cockpits. , 1986, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  C. Cedrone,et al.  Standardized measurement of visual acuity. , 1998, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[9]  Ian Lewin.  Luminaire Design Related to Visibility , 1973 .

[10]  Yoshiro Aoki,et al.  Recovery time of visual acuity after exposure to a glare source , 1999 .

[11]  C Collet,et al.  Autonomic nervous system and subjective ratings of strain in air-traffic control. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Peter Boyce,et al.  Lighting quality and office work: two field simulation experiments , 2006 .

[13]  J KASWAN,et al.  EFFECT OF LUMINANCE, EXPOSURE DURATION, AND TASK COMPLEXITY ON REACTION TIME. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  D. Robinson.  Visual reaction time and the human alpha rhythm: the effects of stimulus luminance, area, and duration. , 1966, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[15]  Jianming Wu,et al.  On the standardization of VDT's proper and optimal contrast range , 1990 .

[16]  Samuel P. Sturgis,et al.  Effects of Glare and Background Luminance on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity: Implications for Driver Night Vision Testing. , 1982, Human factors.

[17]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  IMMEDIATE AND LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF GLARE FROM FOLLOWING VEHICLES ON TARGET DETECTION IN DRIVING SIMULATOR , 1996 .