Transcription regulation by CarD in mycobacteria is guided by basal promoter kinetics

Bacterial pathogens like Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) employ transcription factors to adapt their physiology to the diverse environments within their host. CarD is a conserved bacterial transcription factor that is essential for viability in Mtb. Unlike classical transcription factors that recognize promoters by binding to specific DNA sequence motifs, CarD binds directly to the RNA polymerase (RNAP) to stabilize the open complex intermediate (RPo) during transcription initiation. We previously showed using RNA-sequencing that CarD is capable of both activating and repressing transcription in vivo. However, it is unknown how CarD achieves promoter specific regulatory outcomes in Mtb despite binding indiscriminate of DNA sequence. We propose a model where CarD’s regulatory outcome depends on the promoter’s basal RPo stability and test this model using in vitro transcription from a panel of promoters with varying levels of RPo stability. We show that CarD directly activates full-length transcript production from the Mtb ribosomal RNA promoter rrnAP3 (AP3) and that the degree of transcription activation by CarD is negatively correlated with RPo stability. Using targeted mutations in the extended −10 and discriminator region of AP3, we show that CarD directly represses transcription from promoters that form relatively stable RPo. DNA supercoiling also influenced RPo stability and affected the direction of CarD regulation, indicating that the outcome of CarD activity can be regulated by factors beyond promoter sequence. Our results provide experimental evidence for how RNAP-binding transcription factors like CarD can exert specific regulatory outcomes based on the kinetic properties of a promoter.

[1]  James E. Allen,et al.  Ensembl 2022 , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  E. Eng,et al.  Structural origins of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex stability , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  M. Record,et al.  Temperature effects on RNA polymerase initiation kinetics reveal which open complex initiates and that bubble collapse is stepwise , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  R. Gourse,et al.  Rhodobacter sphaeroides CarD Negatively Regulates Its Own Promoter , 2021, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  G. Garcia,et al.  High-throughput screening to discover inhibitors of the CarD·RNA polymerase protein–protein interaction in Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Kevin S. Myers,et al.  A majority of Rhodobacter sphaeroides promoters lack a crucial RNA polymerase recognition feature, enabling coordinated transcription activation , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Drake Jensen,et al.  The Context-Dependent Influence of Promoter Sequence Motifs on Transcription Initiation Kinetics and Regulation , 2020, Journal of Bacteriology.

[8]  K. Brodolin,et al.  The σ Subunit-Remodeling Factors: An Emerging Paradigms of Transcription Regulation , 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[9]  Albert Y. Chen,et al.  Stepwise Promoter Melting by Bacterial RNA Polymerase. , 2020, Molecular cell.

[10]  Albert Y. Chen,et al.  E. coli TraR allosterically regulates transcription initiation by altering RNA polymerase conformation , 2019, eLife.

[11]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  C. Dorman.  DNA supercoiling and transcription in bacteria: a two-way street , 2019, BMC Molecular and Cell Biology.

[13]  C. Stallings,et al.  CarD and RbpA modify the kinetics of initial transcription and slow promoter escape of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA polymerase , 2019, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Genome-wide effects on Escherichia coli transcription from ppGpp binding to its two sites on RNA polymerase , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Scarlet S. Shell,et al.  Defining the Transcriptional and Post-transcriptional Landscapes of Mycobacterium smegmatis in Aerobic Growth and Hypoxia , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[16]  Justine Collier,et al.  The conserved transcriptional regulator CdnL is required for metabolic homeostasis and morphogenesis in Caulobacter , 2019, bioRxiv.

[17]  S. Darst,et al.  Structures of an RNA polymerase promoter melting intermediate elucidate DNA unwinding , 2019, Nature.

[18]  E. Galburt.  The calculation of transcript flux ratios reveals single regulatory mechanisms capable of activation and repression , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Albert Y. Chen,et al.  Transcriptional Responses to ppGpp and DksA. , 2018, Annual review of microbiology.

[20]  Y. Lou,et al.  LtpA, a CdnL-type CarD regulator, is important for the enzootic cycle of the Lyme disease pathogen , 2018, Emerging Microbes & Infections.

[21]  V. Mizrahi,et al.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2018, Trends in microbiology.

[22]  Justin J. Miller,et al.  Domains within RbpA Serve Specific Functional Roles That Regulate the Expression of Distinct Mycobacterial Gene Subsets , 2018, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  A. Kapanidis,et al.  Pausing controls branching between productive and non-productive pathways during initial transcription in bacteria , 2018, Nature Communications.

[24]  T. Heyduk,et al.  DNA template sequence control of bacterial RNA polymerase escape from the promoter , 2018, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  M. Glickman,et al.  Structure and function of the mycobacterial transcription initiation complex with the essential regulator RbpA , 2017, eLife.

[26]  S. Darst,et al.  Effects of Increasing the Affinity of CarD for RNA Polymerase on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth, rRNA Transcription, and Virulence , 2016, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  Jookyung J Lee,et al.  Bacterial RNA Polymerase-DNA Interaction—The Driving Force of Gene Expression and the Target for Drug Action , 2016, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[28]  C. Dorman,et al.  DNA supercoiling is a fundamental regulatory principle in the control of bacterial gene expression , 2016, Biophysical Reviews.

[29]  C. Stallings,et al.  Cooperative stabilization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis rrnAP3 promoter open complexes by RbpA and CarD , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  C. Stallings,et al.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis Transcription Machinery: Ready To Respond to Host Attacks , 2016, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  M. Chase,et al.  Leaderless Transcripts and Small Proteins Are Common Features of the Mycobacterial Translational Landscape , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[32]  S. Darst,et al.  CarD uses a minor groove wedge mechanism to stabilize the RNA polymerase open promoter complex , 2015, eLife.

[33]  S. Darst,et al.  Structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme open promoter complex , 2015, eLife.

[34]  S. Darst,et al.  Structural, functional, and genetic analyses of the actinobacterial transcription factor RbpA , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  A. Kulbachinskiy,et al.  Mutations in the CRE pocket of bacterial RNA polymerase affect multiple steps of transcription , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  Thomas A Steitz,et al.  Crystal structures of the E. coli transcription initiation complexes with a complete bubble. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[37]  C. Stallings,et al.  CarD stabilizes mycobacterial open complexes via a two-tiered kinetic mechanism , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  Nathan D. Price,et al.  The DNA-binding network of Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 2015, Nature Communications.

[39]  S. Darst,et al.  Mycobacterial RNA polymerase forms unstable open promoter complexes that are stabilized by CarD , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  W. Huber,et al.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 , 2014, Genome Biology.

[41]  T. Heyduk,et al.  Kinetics of promoter escape by bacterial RNA polymerase: effects of promoter contacts and transcription bubble collapse. , 2014, The Biochemical journal.

[42]  C. Stallings,et al.  CarD integrates three functional modules to promote efficient transcription, antibiotic tolerance, and pathogenesis in mycobacteria , 2014, Molecular microbiology.

[43]  J. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Optimization of recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA polymerase expression and purification. , 2014, Tuberculosis.

[44]  Björn Usadel,et al.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data , 2014, Bioinform..

[45]  Olga T. Schubert,et al.  Genome-wide Mapping of Transcriptional Start Sites Defines an Extensive Leaderless Transcriptome in Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 2014, Cell Reports.

[46]  Wei Shi,et al.  featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features , 2013, Bioinform..

[47]  T. Nyström,et al.  A Proximal Promoter Element Required for Positive Transcriptional Control by Guanosine Tetraphosphate and DksA Protein during the Stringent Response* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  M. Carr,et al.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA Polymerase-binding Protein A (RbpA) and Its Interactions with Sigma Factors* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  M. Glickman,et al.  Interaction of CarD with RNA Polymerase Mediates Mycobacterium tuberculosis Viability, Rifampin Resistance, and Pathogenesis , 2012, Journal of bacteriology.

[50]  Shiyun Chen,et al.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis RbpA protein is a new type of transcriptional activator that stabilizes the σA-containing RNA polymerase holoenzyme , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[51]  S. Darst,et al.  Structural Basis for Promoter −10 Element Recognition by the Bacterial RNA Polymerase σ Subunit , 2011, Cell.

[52]  R. Gourse,et al.  Direct regulation of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein promoters by the transcription factors ppGpp and DksA , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  R. Gourse,et al.  Advances in bacterial promoter recognition and its control by factors that do not bind DNA , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[54]  Melanie B. Berkmen,et al.  rRNA Promoter Regulation by Nonoptimal Binding of σ Region 1.2: An Additional Recognition Element for RNA Polymerase , 2006, Cell.

[55]  Melanie B. Berkmen,et al.  DksA potentiates direct activation of amino acid promoters by ppGpp , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  John W. Foster,et al.  DksA A Critical Component of the Transcription Initiation Machinery that Potentiates the Regulation of rRNA Promoters by ppGpp and the Initiating NTP , 2004, Cell.

[57]  R. Ebright,et al.  Promoter unwinding and promoter clearance by RNA polymerase: detection by single-molecule DNA nanomanipulation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  R. Sen,et al.  Generality of the Branched Pathway in Transcription Initiation byEscherichia coli RNA Polymerase* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  S. Darst,et al.  Structure of the Bacterial RNA Polymerase Promoter Specificity σ Subunit , 2002 .

[60]  M. Buckle,et al.  The G+C-rich discriminator region of the tyrT promoter antagonises the formation of stable preinitiation complexes. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  Constitutive function of a positively regulated promoter reveals new sequences essential for activity. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[62]  A. Rich,et al.  AT base pairs are less stable than GC base pairs in Z-DNA: The crystal structure of d(m5CGTAm5CG) , 1984, Cell.