Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates.

OBJECTIVE An aging American population carries a high prevalence of profound sensorineural hearing loss. We examined the performance of multichannel cochlear implant recipients in a large database of adult subjects. DESIGN Nonconcurrent prospective study of a national cohort with multivariate regression analysis of preoperative and postoperative performance variables in multichannel cochlear implant recipients. We applied models of prediction established in previous studies to the observed results. SETTING Referral centers with active cochlear implant programs. PATIENTS Adolescents and adults with profound hearing loss (N = 749; age range, 14-91 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Postoperative monosyllabic word recognition. RESULTS The population 65 years and older demonstrated a clinically insignificant 4.6%-smaller postoperative word score compared with the population younger than 65 years. When duration of deafness exceeded 25 years, elderly recipients demonstrated higher word scores than their younger counterparts. A more significant factor affecting outcomes is the ratio of duration of deafness to age at implantation. CONCLUSIONS Age at implantation carried relatively little predictive value for postoperative performance in subjects 65 years and older. Although a small decrement in mean speech recognition scores was evident, the clinical significance of this difference is questionable when all of the results observed in elderly patients are considered. A shorter percentage of life spent in severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss suggests a foundation of acoustic/auditory processing in the elderly cohort that may mitigate potential physiological effects associated with advanced age. This study confirms and extends previous observations that duration of profound deafness and residual speech recognition carry higher predictive value than the age at which an individual receives an implant.

[1]  H. Francis,et al.  Impact of Cochlear Implants on the Functional Health Status of Older Adults , 2002, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  J. Niparko,et al.  Choice of Ear for Cochlear Implantation: The Effect of History and Residual Hearing on Predicted Postoperative Performance , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  J. Nedzelski,et al.  Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[5]  A. Lalwani,et al.  Cochlear Implant Outcomes in the Elderly , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[6]  S B Waltzman,et al.  The Benefits of Cochlear Implantation in the Geriatric Population , 1993, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[7]  H. Djalilian,et al.  Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly: Results and Quality-of-Life Assessment , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[8]  J. Thomas Cochlear implantation of the elderly. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[9]  Maija S. Peltola,et al.  Stability of memory traces for speech sounds in cochlear implant patients , 2002, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[10]  A. J. Thomas Acquired deafness and mental health. , 1981, The British journal of medical psychology.

[11]  R. Labadie,et al.  Cochlear Implant Performance in Senior Citizens , 2000, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  Ronald Klein,et al.  The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[13]  A. Bacciu,et al.  Speech recognition in elderly cochlear implant recipients. , 2003, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[14]  M. Kilgard,et al.  Environmental enrichment improves response strength, threshold, selectivity, and latency of auditory cortex neurons. , 2004, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Feldman,et al.  The severely to profoundly hearing-impaired population in the United States: prevalence estimates and demographics. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[16]  Richard S. Tyler,et al.  Cochlear Implantation: Relationships with Research on Auditory Deprivation and Acclimatization , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[17]  W. Parkinson,et al.  Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. , 1999, The American journal of otology.

[18]  R. Klinke,et al.  Congenital auditory deprivation reduces synaptic activity within the auditory cortex in a layer-specific manner. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Shipp Db,et al.  Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis. , 1995 .

[20]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Association Between Hearing Impairment and the Quality of Life of Elderly Individuals , 1990, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.