The evaluation of force exertions and muscle activities when operating a manual guided vehicle.

A manual guided vehicle (MGV) is used to handle heavy materials in thin film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) manufacturing clean rooms. This study focuses on evaluating the force exertions and muscle activities in MGV operations. The independent variables include gender, force direction, handle height, load handled and wheel diameter of the MGV. The results show the force direction, handle height and load handling effects are significant in most measures except for F(ending) (the peak force required to stop the MGV) and the EMG of the anterior deltoid. The wheel diameter had a significant effect on F(initial) (the peak force required to move the MGV) and F(ending) responses. Gender did not significantly effect any measures. Moreover, the pushing and pulling force is less at 115cm handle height than at 101.5cm and 88cm handle heights. Using 15.3cm (6 inch) diameter wheels requires less force than 20.3cm (8 inch) diameter wheels because the two front wheels are fixed and the two rear wheels are rotatable. The design implications are discussed.

[1]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[2]  W. Marras,et al.  Spine loading at different lumbar levels during pushing and pulling , 2009, Ergonomics.

[3]  Monique H W Frings-Dresen,et al.  Evaluation of ergonomic adjustments of catering carts to reduce external pushing forces. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  M. M. Ayoub,et al.  Effects of Operator Stance on Pushing and Pulling Tasks , 1974 .

[5]  D B Chaffin,et al.  An ergonomic evaluation of handle height and load in maximal and submaximal cart pushing. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Biman Das,et al.  Ergonomics evaluation and redesign of a hospital meal cart. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  Kinematics, Kinetics, and Psychophysical Perceptions in Symmetric and Twisting Pushing and Pulling Tasks , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Yu-Cheng Lin,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF ANTHROPOMETRIC WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR TAIWANESE WORKERS , 1999 .

[9]  Alfred A. Amendola,et al.  The effect of handle height and cart load on the initial hand forces in cart pushing and pulling , 1999 .

[10]  Shrawan Kumar,et al.  Symmetric and Asymmetric Two-Handed Pull-Push Strength of Young Adults , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[11]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Effect of handle height on lower-back loading in cart pushing and pulling. , 1991, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  Volitional Postures during Maximal Push/Pull Exertions in the Sagittal Plane , 1981, Human factors.

[13]  K W Al-Eisawi,et al.  Factors affecting minimum push and pull forces of manual carts. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Patrick G. Dempsey,et al.  Revisited: Comparison of two techniques to establish maximum acceptable forces of dynamic pushing for male industrial workers , 2004 .

[15]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  The evaluation of manual FOUP handling in 300-mm wafer fab , 2003 .

[16]  A. Silman,et al.  Role of mechanical and psychosocial factors in the onset of forearm pain: prospective population based study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  A J van der Beek,et al.  Gender differences in exerted forces and physiological load during pushing and pulling of wheeled cages by postal workers , 2000, Ergonomics.

[18]  R. Buschbacher.  Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk , 2007 .

[19]  C. H. Edwards.  Applied ergonomics. , 1990, Work.

[20]  M. Frings-Dresen,et al.  Pushing and pulling in relation to musculoskeletal disorders: a review of risk factors. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[21]  I Kingma,et al.  Force direction and physical load in dynamic pushing and pulling , 2000, Ergonomics.

[22]  Vincent M Ciriello,et al.  Dynamic pushing on three frictional surfaces: maximum acceptable forces, cardiopulmonary and calf muscle metabolic responses in healthy men , 2009, Ergonomics.

[23]  D. Chaffin.  Manual materials handling and the biomechanical basis for prevention of low-back pain in industry--an overview. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[24]  F. Quatra,et al.  A comparison of dominant and non dominant hand strengths. , 2001, Journal of hand surgery.

[25]  Vincent M Ciriello,et al.  Psychophysically Determined Horizontal and Vertical Forces of Dynamic Pushing on High and Low Coefficient of Friction Floors for Female Industrial Workers , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[26]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number : 1072954 Registered office : , 2011 .

[27]  E. Delagi,et al.  Anatomical guide for the electromyographer : the limbs and trunk /by Edward F. Delagi [et al.] ; illustrated by Phyllis B. Hammond, Aldo O. Perotto, and Hugh Thomas , 2005 .