Effective Marketing Science Applications: Insights from the ISMS-MSI Practice Prize Finalist Papers and Projects

From 2003 to 2012, the ISMS-MSI Practice Prize/Award competition has documented 25 impactful projects, with associated papers appearing in Marketing Science. This article reviews these papers and projects, examines their influence on the relevant organizations, and provides a perspective on the diffusion and impact of marketing science models within the organizations. We base our analysis on three sources of data---the articles, authors' responses to a survey, and in-depth interviews with the authors. We draw some conclusions about how marketing science models can create more impact without losing academic rigor while maintaining strong relevance to practice. We find that the application and diffusion of marketing science models are not restricted to the well-known choice models, conjoint analysis, mapping, and promotional analysis---there are very effective applications across a wide range of managerial problems using an array of marketing science techniques. There is no one successful approach, and although some factors are correlated with impactful marketing science models, there are a number of pathways by which a project can add value to its client organization. Simpler, easier-to-use models that offer robust and improved results can have a stronger impact than academically sophisticated models can. Organizational buy-in is critical and can be achieved through recognizing high-level champions, holding in-house presentations and dialogues, doing pilot assignments, involving multidepartment personnel, and speaking the same language as the influential executives. And we find that intermediaries often, but not always, play a key role in the transportability and diffusion of models across organizations. Although these applications are impressive and reflect profitable academic--practitioner partnerships, changes in the knowledge base and reward systems for academics, intermediaries, and practitioners are required for marketing science approaches to realize their potential impact on a much larger scale than the highly selective sample that we have been able to analyze.

[1]  A. Rangaswamy,et al.  Performance implications of deploying marketing analytics , 2013 .

[2]  Ashish Sinha,et al.  Practice Prize Paper - Category Optimizer: A Dynamic-Assortment, New-Product-Introduction, Mix-Optimization, and Demand-Planning System , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[3]  V. Kumar,et al.  Practice Prize Winner - Creating a Measurable Social Media Marketing Strategy: Increasing the Value and ROI of Intangibles and Tangibles for Hokey Pokey , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[4]  Nadia Abou Nabout,et al.  Practice Prize Paper - PROSAD: A Bidding Decision Support System for Profit Optimizing Search Engine Advertising , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[5]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  Marketing Management Support Systems: Principles, Tools, and Implementation , 2012 .

[6]  Sönke Albers,et al.  Optimizable and Implementable Aggregate Response Modeling for Marketing Decision Support , 2012 .

[7]  Thorsten Wiesel,et al.  Practice Prize Paper - Marketing's Profit Impact: Quantifying Online and Off-line Funnel Progression , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[8]  Nils Wagner,et al.  Practice Prize Winner - Dynamic Marketing Budget Allocation Across Countries, Products, and Marketing Activities , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[9]  Peter J. Danaher,et al.  Practice Prize Paper - Applying a Dynamic Model of Consumer Choice to Guide Brand Development at Jetstar Airways , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[10]  V. Kumar,et al.  Practice Prize Paper - Uncovering Implicit Consumer Needs for Determining Explicit Product Positioning: Growing Prudential Annuities' Variable Annuity Sales , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Bridging the Academic–Practitioner Divide in Marketing Decision Models , 2011 .

[12]  John H. Roberts Has Research in Marketing Lost Its Way? , 2010 .

[13]  S. Albers,et al.  Submission to the 2009-2010 ISMS-MSI Practice Prize Competition Dynamic Marketing Budget Allocation across Countries , Products , and Marketing Activities , 2010 .

[14]  Lili Xie,et al.  Practice Prize Paper - PIN Optimal Distribution of Auction Vehicles System: Applying Price Forecasting, Elasticity Estimation, and Genetic Algorithms to Used-Vehicle Distribution , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[15]  Rohit Gulati,et al.  Practice Prize Paper - Marketing-Mix Recommendations to Manage Value Growth at P&G Asia-Pacific , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[16]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Practice Prize Winner - Pricing Digital Content Product Lines: A Model and Application for the National Academies Press , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[17]  Thorsten Wiesel,et al.  Marketing’s Profit Impact: Quantifying Online and Offline Funnel Progression , 2009 .

[18]  John D. C. Little,et al.  A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[19]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Practice Prize Paper - BRAN*EQT: A Multicategory Brand Equity Model and Its Application at Allstate , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[20]  V. Kumar,et al.  Practice Prize Report - The Power of CLV: Managing Customer Lifetime Value at IBM , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[21]  Irina Ionova,et al.  Practice Prize Winner - A Nested Logit Model of Product and Transaction-Type Choice for Planning Automakers' Pricing and Promotions , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[22]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Practice Prize Report - Planning New Tariffs at tele.ring: The Application and Impact of an Integrated Segmentation, Targeting, and Positioning Tool , 2008, Marketing science (Providence, R.I.).

[23]  Jorge M. Silva-Risso,et al.  —A Nested Logit Model of Product and Transaction-Type Choice for Planning Automakers' Pricing and Promotions , 2008 .

[24]  Kusum L. Ailawadi,et al.  Practice Prize Report---Quantifying and Improving Promotion Effectiveness at CVS , 2007 .

[25]  André Elisseeff,et al.  The 2005 ISMS Practice Prize Winner---Customer Equity and Lifetime Management (CELM) Finnair Case Study , 2007 .

[26]  A. Taudes,et al.  Practice Prize Report---An Assortmentwide Decision-Support System for Dynamic Pricing and Promotion Planning in DIY Retailing , 2007 .

[27]  Martin Natter,et al.  An Assortment-Wide Decision-Support System for Dynamic Pricing and Promotion Planning in DIY Retailing , 2006 .

[28]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Modeling the Microeffects of Television Advertising: Which Ad Works, When, Where, for How Long, and Why? , 2006 .

[29]  B. Ratchford,et al.  Practice Prize Article-CHAN4CAST: A Multichannel, Multiregion Sales Forecasting Model and Decision Support System for Consumer Packaged Goods , 2005 .

[30]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Practice Prize Reports , 2005 .

[31]  Prabhakant Sinha,et al.  The 2004 ISMS Practice Prize Winner-Sales Territory Design: Thirty Years of Modeling and Implementation , 2005 .

[32]  John Roberts,et al.  A Prelaunch Diffusion Model for Evaluating Market Defense Strategies , 2005 .

[33]  John D. C. Little,et al.  Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Predicting Sales Takeoff for Whirlpool's New Personal Valet , 2006 .

[35]  John D. C. Little,et al.  Comments on "Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus" , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Arnd Huchzermeier,et al.  The 2003 ISMS Practice Prize Winner: Optimizing Rhenania's Direct Marketing Business Through Dynamic Multilevel Modeling (DMLM) in a Multicatalog-Brand Environment , 2004 .

[37]  Arnd Huchzermeier,et al.  Optimizing Rhenania´s Direct Marketing Business through Dynamic Multi-Level Modeling (DMLM) in a Multi-Catalog-Brand Environment , 2004 .

[38]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Predicting Sales Takeoff for Whirlpool ’ s New Personal Valet , 2004 .

[39]  Peter C. Bell,et al.  Strategic Operations Research and the Edelman Prize Finalist Applications 1989-1998 , 2003, Oper. Res..

[40]  Leonard M. Lodish Building Marketing Models that Make Money , 2001, Interfaces.

[41]  Russell S. Winer,et al.  Comment on Leeflang and Wittink , 2000 .

[42]  John Roberts,et al.  The intersection of modelling potential and practice , 2000 .

[43]  D. Wittink,et al.  Building Models for Marketing Decisions , 2000 .

[44]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Building models for marketing decisions: past, present and future , 2000 .

[45]  Gerrit van Bruggen,et al.  Marketing Management Support Systems , 2000 .

[46]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  The Success of Marketing Management Support Systems , 1999 .

[47]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  The Integration of Marketing Problem-Solving Modes and Marketing Management Support Systems , 1997 .

[48]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[49]  Richard Staelin,et al.  Environment, Market Share, and Market Power , 1990 .

[50]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision, 2nd ed. , 1987 .

[51]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Pre-Test-Market Models: Validation and Managerial Implications , 1983 .

[52]  R. Hogarth Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision , 1982 .

[53]  J. Little Decision Support Systems for Marketing Managers , 1979 .

[54]  G. Box Robustness in the Strategy of Scientific Model Building. , 1979 .

[55]  G. Urban,et al.  Pre-Test-Market Evaluation of New Packaged Goods: A Model and Measurement Methodology , 1978 .

[56]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .