A Developmental Conceptualization of Return to Work

Introduction: Although return to work (RTW) is a phenomenon that has been researched for many years, our ability to understand and improve outcomes is still limited. As an avenue for advancing the field, this paper presents an alternative way of thinking about RTW. Method: The conceptualization was constructed based on a review of the literature and the comments of RTW and workers' compensation researchers. Results: RTW is presented as an evolving process, comprising four key phases: i.e., “off work,” “work re-entry,” “retention,” and “advancement.” In addition, multiple phase-specific outcomes that may be used to evaluate RTW success are advanced. Conclusion: Broadening thinking about RTW to take into consideration the complexities of its developmental nature holds promise for understanding and improving RTW, as it not only clarifies the importance of incremental milestones, but also facilitates intervention choice and evaluation.

[1]  I. Nuwayhid,et al.  The impact of occupational injury on injured worker and family: outcomes of upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in Maryland workers. , 2000, American journal of industrial medicine.

[2]  M. Savickas.  The Theory and Practice of Career Construction. , 2005 .

[3]  A. Cheadle,et al.  What Do Injured Workers Think About Their Medical Care and Outcomes After Work Injury? , 2002, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[4]  K. McPherson,et al.  Success in the workplace following traumatic brain injury: are we evaluating what is most important? , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  Robert Gatchel,et al.  Improving Return to Work Research , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[6]  D R Becker,et al.  Fidelity of supported employment programs and employment outcomes. , 2001, Psychiatric services.

[7]  S. Finger,et al.  Early brain damage , 1984 .

[8]  P. Loisel,et al.  Helping Clinicians in Work Disability Prevention: The Work Disability Diagnosis Interview , 2002, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[9]  Robert E Drake,et al.  Implementing Evidence-Based Practices for People with Severe Mental Illness , 2003, Behavior modification.

[10]  N. Buys,et al.  Developing Relationships Between Vocational Rehabilitation Agencies and Employers , 2001 .

[11]  I J Higginson,et al.  Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Jeffrey N Katz,et al.  Work-Related Outcomes in Occupational Low Back Pain: A Multidimensional Analysis , 2002, Spine.

[13]  V. Reno,et al.  Workers’ Compensation: Benefits, Coverage, and Costs, 2009 , 2003 .

[14]  Samy Suissa,et al.  A Population‐Based, Randomized Clinical Trial on Back Pain Management , 1997, Spine.

[15]  P. Halligan,et al.  New wine in old bottles: the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[16]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[17]  Seeking Care for Low Back Pain in the General Population: A Two-Year Follow-up Study: Results From the MUSIC–Norrtälje Study , 2002, Spine.

[18]  H. Ursin,et al.  Five‐Year Follow‐Up Study of a Controlled Clinical Trial Using Light Mobilization and an Informative Approach to Low Back Pain , 1998, Spine.

[19]  N. Krause,et al.  Readiness for Return to Work Following Injury or Illness: Conceptualizing the Interpersonal Impact of Health Care, Workplace, and Insurance Factors , 2002, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[20]  L Rudolph,et al.  Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. , 2001, American journal of industrial medicine.

[21]  Johannes R. Anema,et al.  Return-to-Work Outcomes Following Work Disability: Stakeholder Motivations, Interests and Concerns , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[22]  Caitlin P. Williams,et al.  Developmental tasks of career maintenance , 1990 .

[23]  D R Ragland,et al.  Occupational Disability Due to Low Back Pain: A New Interdisciplinary Classification Based on a Phase Model of Disability , 1994, Spine.

[24]  G. Pransky,et al.  Recurrence of Low Back Pain: Definition-Sensitivity Analysis Using Administrative Data , 2003, Spine.

[25]  M. Savickas,et al.  Establishing a Career: Developmental Tasks and Coping Responses. , 1995 .

[26]  J. Vlaeyen,et al.  Quality of life in chronic pain is more associated with beliefs about pain, than with pain intensity , 2005, European journal of pain.

[27]  L. Boden,et al.  Economic consequences of workplace injuries and illnesses: lost earnings and benefit adequacy. , 1999, American journal of industrial medicine.