Continuous Attractor Neural Networks: Candidate of a Canonical Model for Neural Information Representation

Owing to its many computationally desirable properties, the model of continuous attractor neural networks (CANNs) has been successfully applied to describe the encoding of simple continuous features in neural systems, such as orientation, moving direction, head direction, and spatial location of objects. Recent experimental and computational studies revealed that complex features of external inputs may also be encoded by low-dimensional CANNs embedded in the high-dimensional space of neural population activity. The new experimental data also confirmed the existence of the M-shaped correlation between neuronal responses, which is a correlation structure associated with the unique dynamics of CANNs. This body of evidence, which is reviewed in this report, suggests that CANNs may serve as a canonical model for neural information representation.

[1]  Si Wu,et al.  Fluctuation-response relation unifies dynamical behaviors in neural fields. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  A. Compte,et al.  Bump attractor dynamics in prefrontal cortex explains behavioral precision in spatial working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Cognitive neurophysiology of the motor cortex. , 1993, Science.

[4]  N. Logothetis,et al.  View-dependent object recognition by monkeys , 1994, Current Biology.

[5]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Synaptic mechanisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  A. Pouget,et al.  Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  B. Ermentrout.  Neural networks as spatio-temporal pattern-forming systems , 1998 .

[8]  S. Amari.  Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields , 1977, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Visual prediction: Psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  D. Touretzky,et al.  Modeling attractor deformation in the rodent head-direction system. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Stimulus-dependent variability and noise correlations in cortical MT neurons , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Si Wu,et al.  Neural Information Processing with Feedback Modulations , 2012, Neural Computation.

[15]  P. Bressloff.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of continuum neural fields , 2012 .

[16]  Si Wu,et al.  Dynamics and Computation of Continuous Attractors , 2008, Neural Computation.

[17]  Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Modeling human target reaching with an adaptive observer implemented with dynamic neural fields , 2015, Neural Networks.

[18]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Path Integration and Cognitive Mapping in a Continuous Attractor Neural Network Model , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Si Wu,et al.  A Moving Bump in a Continuous Manifold: A Comprehensive Study of the Tracking Dynamics of Continuous Attractor Neural Networks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[20]  W. Newsome,et al.  Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex , 2013, Nature.

[21]  Si Wu,et al.  Computing with Continuous Attractors: Stability and Online Aspects , 2005, Neural Computation.

[22]  K. Zhang,et al.  Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[24]  Si Wu,et al.  Dynamical Synapses Enhance Neural Information Processing: Gracefulness, Accuracy, and Mobility , 2011, Neural Computation.

[25]  Xiao-Jing Wang.  Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  Si Wu,et al.  Spike Frequency Adaptation Implements Anticipative Tracking in Continuous Attractor Neural Networks , 2014, NIPS.

[27]  R. Klein,et al.  A Model of Saccade Initiation Based on the Competitive Integration of Exogenous and Endogenous Signals in the Superior Colliculus , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.