Multi-perspective application selection: a method to identify sustainable applications for new materials using the example of cellulose nanofiber reinforced composites

To date, technical and economic criteria have become the main benchmarks used in assessing the substitution potential of new materials. Sustainable product design uses multi-criteria decision methods to select the best material or process from a set of alternatives, requiring that the target product is already known. This paper follows a contrary approach by introducing the Multi-Perspective Application Selection, a method to support researchers and industrial practitioners alike in identifying and choosing the most promising and sustainable applications for new materials under development. This is achieved through combining and assessing technical, economic and environmental criteria covering the entire life cycle of an application. With this method, numerous possible applications can be screened during the early stages of material development when little information is available. The results help to narrow the selection of feasible products by excluding unpromising applications. The first step involves identifying and segmenting potential markets. In the second step, technical and economic aspects are assessed by employing user acceptance criteria. Finally, simplified life cycle assessment calculations are implemented in the third step to cover environmental considerations. Using an example of cellulose nanofiber reinforced composites, the authors illustrate the procedure whereby luxury consumer goods, specialty vehicles, industrial processing and furniture result as the most promising applications identified from this new method. The results give the researchers a more holistic understanding of their material and help to establish the requirements that the material must fulfill for the selected application. With that knowledge, the method can help enact development pathways in applied materials research.

[1]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biofibres replacing glass fibres as reinforcement in plastics , 2001 .

[2]  Lennart Y. Ljungberg,et al.  Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products , 2007 .

[3]  S. M. Sapuan,et al.  Material screening and choosing methods: A review , 2010 .

[4]  Julien Bras,et al.  Cellulosic Bionanocomposites: A Review of Preparation, Properties and Applications , 2010 .

[5]  Marcel Weil,et al.  Approach and application of life cycle screening in early phases of process design: case study of supercritical water gasification , 2011 .

[6]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives , 2012 .

[7]  María D. Bovea,et al.  A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process , 2012 .

[8]  S. Kamel,et al.  Nanotechnology and its applications in lignocellulosic composites, a mini review , 2007 .

[9]  Sabu Thomas,et al.  Cellulose Nanocomposites for High-Performance Applications , 2011 .

[10]  R. Pachauri Climate change 2007. Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report , 2008 .

[11]  Alain Dufresne,et al.  Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[12]  Mohini Saxena,et al.  Sisal Fiber Based Polymer Composites and Their Applications , 2011 .

[13]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[14]  Xiao-Bing Hu,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: Artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach , 2009 .

[15]  H. M. Azeredo Nanocomposites for food packaging applications , 2009 .

[16]  Balbir Singh Kaith,et al.  Cellulose Fibers: Bio- and Nano-Polymer Composites , 2011 .

[17]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Curauafibers in the automobile industry e a sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[18]  Claudia Som,et al.  Risk preventative innovation strategies for emerging technologies the cases of nano-textiles and smart textiles , 2014 .

[19]  T. Nishino,et al.  All-Cellulose Composite , 2004 .

[20]  Arlindo Silva,et al.  Life cycle engineering methodology applied to material selection, a fender case study , 2008 .

[21]  Julien Bras,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose - its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. , 2012, Carbohydrate polymers.

[22]  Hota V. S. GangaRao,et al.  Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure , 2012 .

[23]  R. Lozano Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally , 2008 .

[24]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Trends in worldwide nanotechnology patent applications: 1991 to 2008 , 2009, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[25]  Masaya Nogi,et al.  Transparent Nanocomposites Based on Cellulose Produced by Bacteria Offer Potential Innovation in the Electronics Device Industry , 2008 .

[26]  Véronique Favier,et al.  Polymer Nanocomposites Reinforced by Cellulose Whiskers , 1995 .

[27]  Noela Invernizzi,et al.  Nanotechnology between the lab and the shop floor: what are the effects on labor? , 2011 .

[28]  Sujit Das Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites , 2011 .

[29]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites , 2010, Journal of Materials Science.

[30]  Hans Schnitzer,et al.  A decision support framework considering sustainability for the selection of thermal food processes , 2014 .

[31]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[32]  S. Kalia,et al.  Pretreatments of Natural Fibers and their Application as Reinforcing Material in Polymer Composites—A Review , 2009 .

[33]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  Nanotechnology in the market: promises and realities , 2011 .

[34]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Curauá fibers in the automobile industry - a sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[35]  Arlindo Silva,et al.  Comprehensive approach for informed life cycle-based materials selection , 2013 .

[36]  Ashlie Martini,et al.  Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[37]  Conrad Luttropp,et al.  EcoDesign: what's happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue , 2006 .

[38]  Lucian A. Lucia,et al.  CELLULOSIC NANOCOMPOSITES: A REVIEW , 2008 .

[39]  H. Hiller In: Ullmann''''s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry , 1989 .

[40]  John H. T. Luong,et al.  Reinforced plastics and aerogels by nanocrystalline cellulose , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[41]  Schuyler Matteson,et al.  Methods for multi-criteria sustainability and reliability assessments of power systems , 2014 .