Distributed Adaptive Sampling, Forwarding, and Routing Algorithms for Wireless Visual Sensor Networks

The efficient management of the limited energy resources of a wireless visual sensor network is central to its successful operation. Within this context, this paper focuses on the adaptive sampling, forwarding, and routing actions of each node in order to maximise the information value of the data collected. These actions are inter-related in this setting because each node's energy consumption must be optimally allocated between sampling and transmitting its own data, receiving and forwarding the data of other nodes, and routing any data. Thus, we develop two optimal decentralised algorithms to solve this distributed constraint optimization problem. The first assumes that the route by which data is forwarded to the base station is fixed, and then calculates the optimal sampling, transmitting, and forwarding actions that each node should perform. The second assumes flexible routing, and makes optimal decisions regarding both the integration of actions that each node should choose, and also the route by which the data should be forwarded to the base station. The two algorithms represent a trade-off in optimality, communication cost, and processing time. In an empirical evaluation on sensor networks (whose underlying communication networks exhibit loops), we show that the algorithm with flexible routing is able to deliver approximately twice the quantity of information to the base station compared to the algorithm using fixed routing (where an arbitrary choice of route is made). However, this gain comes at a considerable communication and computational cost (increasing both by a factor of 100 times). Thus, while the algorithm with flexible routing is suitable for networks with a small numbers of nodes, it scales poorly, and as the size of the network increases, the algorithm with fixed routing is favoured.

[1]  A. Rogers,et al.  Decentralised Control of Adaptive Sampling in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008 .

[2]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A utility-based sensing and communication model for a glacial sensor network , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[3]  Gyula Simon,et al.  Countersniper system for urban warfare , 2005, TOSN.

[4]  Prabhakant Sinha,et al.  The Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem , 1979, Oper. Res..

[5]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Distributed Coalition Formation in Visual Sensor Networks: A Virtual Vision Approach , 2007, DCOSS.

[6]  Matt Welsh,et al.  Decentralized, adaptive resource allocation for sensor networks , 2005, NSDI.

[7]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Adopt: asynchronous distributed constraint optimization with quality guarantees , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[8]  S. Voliotis,et al.  Open issues in Wireless Visual Sensor Networking , 2007, 2007 14th International Workshop on Systems, Signals and Image Processing and 6th EURASIP Conference focused on Speech and Image Processing, Multimedia Communications and Services.

[9]  Boi Faltings,et al.  A Scalable Method for Multiagent Constraint Optimization , 2005, IJCAI.

[10]  Bernhard Rinner,et al.  Distributed embedded smart cameras for surveillance applications , 2006, Computer.

[11]  Bernhard Rinner,et al.  The evolution from single to pervasive smart cameras , 2008, 2008 Second ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras.

[12]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Decentralized control of adaptive sampling in wireless sensor networks , 2009, TOSN.

[13]  Peter Desnoyers,et al.  Ultra-low power data storage for sensor networks , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.