Evaluation of the Georeferencing Accuracy of a Photogrammetric Model Using a Quadrocopter with Onboard GNSS RTK

Using a GNSS RTK (Global Navigation Satellite System Real Time Kinematic) -equipped unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) could greatly simplify the construction of highly accurate digital models through SfM (Structure from Motion) photogrammetry, possibly even avoiding the need for ground control points (GCPs). As previous studies on this topic were mostly performed using fixed-wing UAVs, this study aimed to investigate the results achievable by a quadrocopter (DJI Phantom 4 RTK). Three image acquisition flights were performed for two sites of a different character (urban and rural) along with three calculation variants for each flight: georeferencing using ground-surveyed GCPs only, onboard GNSS RTK only, and a combination thereof. The combined and GNSS RTK methods provided the best results (at the expected level of accuracy of 1–2 GSD (Ground Sample Distance)) for both the vertical and horizontal components. The horizontal positioning was also accurate when georeferencing directly based on the onboard GNSS RTK; the vertical component, however, can be (especially where the terrain is difficult for SfM evaluation) burdened with relatively high systematic errors. This problem was caused by the incorrect identification of the interior orientation parameters calculated, as is customary for non-metric cameras, together with bundle adjustment. This problem could be resolved by using a small number of GCPs (at least one) or quality camera pre-calibration.

[1]  H. Eisenbeiss,et al.  DIRECT GEOREFERENCING OF UAVS , 2012 .

[2]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution UAV Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  G. Forlani,et al.  Evaluation of DEM generation accuracy from UAS imagery , 2014 .

[4]  S. Robson,et al.  Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground‐based image networks , 2014 .

[5]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  The Impact of the Calibration Method on the Accuracy of Point Clouds Derived Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Multi-View Stereopsis , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[6]  A. Derrien,et al.  Retrieving 65 years of volcano summit deformation from multitemporal structure from motion: The case of Piton de la Fournaise (La Réunion Island) , 2015 .

[7]  áková,et al.  Using UAV photogrammetry to document rock outcrops , 2016 .

[8]  Markus Gerke,et al.  Accuracy analysis of photogrammetric UAV image blocks: influence of onboard RTK-GNSS and cross flight patterns , 2016 .

[9]  Christophe Delacourt,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of High Resolution Digital Surface Models Computed by PhotoScan® and MicMac® in Sub-Optimal Survey Conditions , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[10]  C. Hugenholtz,et al.  Spatial Accuracy of UAV-Derived Orthoimagery and Topography: Comparing Photogrammetric Models Processed with Direct Geo-Referencing and Ground Control Points , 2016 .

[11]  Sanja Dugonjić Jovančević,et al.  Analysis of a historical landslide in the Rječina River Valley, Croatia , 2016, Geoenvironmental Disasters.

[12]  Toby N. Tonkin,et al.  Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Ľudovít Kovanič,et al.  Use of low-cost UAV photogrammetry to analyze the accuracy of a digital elevation model in a case study , 2016 .

[14]  Phil Moore,et al.  Brief communication: Landslide motion from cross correlation of UAV-derived morphological attributes , 2017 .

[15]  Silvia Di Bartolo,et al.  Use of a remotely piloted aircraft system for hazard assessment in a rocky mining area (Lucca, Italy) , 2017 .

[16]  Piergiorgio Manciola,et al.  Accuracy Analysis of a Dam Model from Drone Surveys , 2017, Sensors.

[17]  M. Cramer,et al.  UAV CAMERAS: OVERVIEW AND GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION BENCHMARK , 2017 .

[18]  F. Nex,et al.  Quality assessment of combined IMU/GNSS data for direct georeferencing in the context of UAV-based mapping , 2017 .

[19]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  Testing Accuracy and Repeatability of UAV Blocks Oriented with GNSS-Supported Aerial Triangulation , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Ruedi Boesch,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles' Imagery on Glaciers , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[21]  R. Urban,et al.  Suitability, characteristics, and comparison of an airship UAV with lidar for middle size area mapping , 2017 .

[22]  G. Buffi,et al.  Survey of the Ridracoli Dam: UAV–based photogrammetry and traditional topographic techniques in the inspection of vertical structures , 2017 .

[23]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  Quality Assessment of DSMs Produced from UAV Flights Georeferenced with On-Board RTK Positioning , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[24]  V. Tofani,et al.  Multitemporal UAV surveys for landslide mapping and characterization , 2018, Landslides.

[25]  Jan Komárek,et al.  Comparison of a commercial and home-assembled fixed-wing UAV for terrain mapping of a post-mining site under leaf-off conditions , 2018, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[26]  Edyta Puniach,et al.  Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Updating Farmland Cadastral Data in Areas Subject to Landslides , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[27]  W. Uijttewaal,et al.  Bank erosion processes measured with UAV-SfM along complex banklines of a straight mid-sized river reach , 2018, Earth Surface Dynamics.

[28]  M. Maurer,et al.  ROCK GLACIER MONITORING USING AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS: CONVENTIONAL VS. UAV-BASED MAPPING – A COMPARATIVE STUDY , 2018, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[29]  S. Vivero,et al.  Monitoring the crisis of a rock glacier with repeated UAV surveys , 2019, Geographica Helvetica.

[30]  Paul Ryan Nesbit,et al.  Enhancing UAV-SfM 3D Model Accuracy in High-Relief Landscapes by Incorporating Oblique Images , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[31]  Xavier Pons,et al.  Comparison of four UAV georeferencing methods for environmental monitoring purposes focusing on the combined use with airborne and satellite remote sensing platforms , 2019, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[32]  Peter Surový,et al.  UAV RTK/PPK Method - An Optimal Solution for Mapping Inaccessible Forested Areas? , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[33]  D. Kulhavy,et al.  Positional Precision Analysis of Orthomosaics Derived from Drone Captured Aerial Imagery , 2019, Drones.

[34]  Jon P. Mills,et al.  PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON OF DJI PHANTOM 4 PRO AND PHANTOM 4 RTK SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[35]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  Indirect UAV Strip Georeferencing by On-Board GNSS Data under Poor Satellite Coverage , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[36]  Alberto Pellegrinelli,et al.  Coastal Mapping Using DJI Phantom 4 RTK in Post-Processing Kinematic Mode , 2020, Drones.