Protein Under-Wrapping Causes Dosage Sensitivity and Decreases Gene Duplicability

A fundamental issue in molecular evolution is how to identify the evolutionary forces that determine the fate of duplicated genes. The dosage balance hypothesis has been invoked to explain gene duplication patterns at the genomic level under the premise that a dosage imbalance among protein-complex subunits or interacting partners is often deleterious. Here we examine this hypothesis by investigating the molecular basis of dosage sensitivity. We focus on the extent of protein wrapping, which indicates how strongly the structural integrity of a protein relies on its interactive context. From this perspective, we predict that the duplicates of a highly under-wrapped protein or protein subunit should (1) be more sensitive to dosage imbalance and be less likely to be retained and (2) be more likely to survive from a whole-genome duplication (WGD) than from a non-WGD because a WGD causes little or no dosage imbalance. Our under-wrapping analysis of more than 12,000 protein structures strongly supports these predictions and further reveals that the effect of dosage sensitivity on gene duplicability decreases with increasing organismal complexity.

[1]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Yeast genome evolution in the post-genome era. , 1999, Current opinion in microbiology.

[2]  Ariel Fernández,et al.  Structural defects and the diagnosis of amyloidogenic propensity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Kevin R. Thornton,et al.  The origin of new genes: glimpses from the young and old , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  A common framework for understanding the origin of genetic dominance and evolutionary fates of gene duplications. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  Ariel Fernández,et al.  Insufficiently dehydrated hydrogen bonds as determinants of protein interactions , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Fundamentals of molecular evolution , 1990 .

[7]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Evolutionary and Physiological Importance of Hub Proteins , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  E. Koonin,et al.  Selection in the evolution of gene duplications , 2002, Genome Biology.

[9]  Andreas Prlic,et al.  Ensembl 2006 , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  Structural similarity enhances interaction propensity of proteins. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Natalia Maltsev,et al.  Higher Gene Duplicabilities for Metabolic Proteins Than for Nonmetabolic Proteins in Yeast and E. coli , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[12]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Protein function, connectivity, and duplicability in yeast. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  B. Snel,et al.  Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions , 2002, Nature.

[14]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Evolvability , 2009, JACM.

[16]  Dr. Susumu Ohno Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[17]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[18]  R. Veitia,et al.  Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[19]  Ariel Fernández,et al.  Keeping dry and crossing membranes , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Molecular basis for specificity in the druggable kinome : sequence-based analysis , 2007 .

[21]  R. Veitia Gene dosage balance: deletions, duplications and dominance. , 2005, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[22]  Ariel Fernández,et al.  Molecular dimension explored in evolution to promote proteomic complexity. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Richard W. Lusk,et al.  Organismal complexity, protein complexity, and gene duplicability , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  M. Nei,et al.  Rapid expansion of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genes in primates and their coevolution with MHC Class I genes. , 2005, Gene.

[25]  G. Wray,et al.  Abundant raw material for cis-regulatory evolution in humans. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  C. Pál,et al.  Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[27]  M. Lynch,et al.  The Origins of Genome Complexity , 2003, Science.

[28]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Gene essentiality, gene duplicability and protein connectivity in human and mouse. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[29]  D. Mindell Fundamentals of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[30]  B. Birren,et al.  Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature.

[31]  Ariel Fernández,et al.  Proteins with H-bond packing defects are highly interactive with lipid bilayers: Implications for amyloidogenesis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  R. Guigó,et al.  Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia , 2006, Nature.

[33]  David Botstein,et al.  GO: : TermFinder--open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes , 2004, Bioinform..