Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered

Abstract While most papers on team decision-making find that teams behave more selfishly, less trustingly and less altruistically than individuals, Cason and Mui (1997) report that teams are more altruistic than individuals in a dictator game. Using a within-subjects design we re-examine group polarization by letting subjects make individual as well as team decisions in an experimental dictator game. In our experiment teams are more selfish than individuals, and the most selfish team member has the strongest influence on team decisions. Various explanations for the different findings in Cason and Mui (1997) and in our paper are discussed.

[1]  H. Barger.  The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money , 1936, Nature.

[2]  E. Miller.  Handbook of Social Psychology , 1946, Mental Health.

[3]  J. Stoner.  A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk , 1961 .

[4]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  Components of group risk taking , 1967 .

[5]  S. Moscovici,et al.  The group as a polarizer of attitudes. , 1969 .

[6]  G. O'Connor.  Small Groups , 1980 .

[7]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[8]  D. Kahneman,et al.  CHAPTER EIGHT. Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market , 2004 .

[9]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950-1990 , 1992 .

[10]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[11]  N. Kerr,et al.  Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .

[12]  David W Harless,et al.  Group vs. Individual Performance in a Price-Searching Experiment , 1996 .

[13]  T. Cason,et al.  A Laboratory Study of Group Polarisation in the Team Dictator Game , 1997 .

[14]  John Duffy,et al.  On the Robustness of Behaviour in Experimental ‘Beauty Contest’ Games , 1997 .

[15]  Ilan Yaniv,et al.  Individual and Group Behavior in the Ultimatum Game: Are Groups More "Rational" Players? , 1998 .

[16]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Learning in High Stakes Ultimatum Games: An Experiment in the Slovak Republic , 1998 .

[17]  Urs Fischbacher,et al.  z-Tree - Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments: experimenter's manual , 1999 .

[18]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Iterated Dominance and Iterated Best-Response in Experimental P-Beauty Contests , 1998 .

[19]  L. Cameron,et al.  Raising the Stakes in the Ultimatum Game: Experimental Evidence From Indonesia , 1999 .

[20]  V. Smith,et al.  Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply , 1999 .

[21]  B. Frey,et al.  Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Comment , 1999 .

[22]  C. Insko,et al.  Toward a reconciliation of diverging perspectives on interindividual-intergroup discontinuity: The role of procedural interdependence , 2001 .

[23]  Ronald Bosman,et al.  Emotional Hazard in a Power-to-Take Experiment , 2002 .

[24]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[25]  James C. Cox.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Other-Regarding Preferences: Groups Vs. Individuals and Males Vs. Females , 2002 .

[26]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[27]  Barry Sopher,et al.  Social Learning and Coordination Conventions in Intergenerational Games: An Experimental Study , 2003, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Individual versus group behavior and the role of the decision making procedure in gift-exchange experiments , 2002 .

[29]  C. Monica Capra,et al.  The Effects of Common Advice on One-shot Traveler’s Dilemma Games: Explaining Behavior through an Introspective Model with Errors , 2003 .

[30]  Roberto A. Weber.  'Learning' with no feedback in a competitive guessing game , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[31]  Andrew Schotter,et al.  Decision Making with Naive Advice , 2003 .

[32]  Matthias Sutter.  Are four heads better than two? An experimental beauty-contest game with teams of different size , 2004 .

[33]  G. Bornstein,et al.  Individual and Group Decisions in the Centipede Game: Are Groups More “Rational” Players? , 2004 .

[34]  J. Andreoni,et al.  Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising , 2004 .

[35]  J. Morgan,et al.  Are Two Heads Better Than One?: Monetary Policy by Committee , 2005 .

[36]  Matthias Sutter.  Team decision making under risk and myopic loss aversion , 2005 .

[37]  Werner Güth,et al.  Bargaining Outside the Lab a Newspaper Experiment of a Three-Person Ultimatum Game , 2005 .

[38]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Does stake size matter in trust games , 2005 .

[39]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Economics Research in Canada: A Long-Run Assessment of Journal Publications , 2007 .

[40]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Are Two Heads Better Than One? Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games , 2005 .

[41]  Robert L. Slonim,et al.  Competing Against Experienced and Inexperienced Players , 2005 .

[42]  M. Kocher,et al.  The Decision Maker Matters: Individual Versus Group Behaviour in Experimental Beauty-Contest Games , 2005 .

[43]  Stephen V. Burks,et al.  The effect of stakes in distribution experiments , 2005 .

[44]  James C. Cox,et al.  Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents? , 2006 .

[45]  Debraj Ray,et al.  Choice Shifts in Groups: A Decision-Theoretic Basis , 2006 .

[46]  Benedikt Herrmann,et al.  The Limits of Self-Governance in the Presence of Spite : Experimental Evidence from Urban and Rural Russia * , 2006 .

[47]  Louis Putterman,et al.  Do Non-Strategic Sanctions Obey the Law of Demand? The Demand for Punishment in the Voluntary Contribution Mechanism , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[48]  Group Polarization in the Team Dictator Game Reconsidered , 2006 .

[49]  Martin Dufwenberg,et al.  Gender composition in teams , 2006 .

[50]  John A. List,et al.  What Do Laboratory Experiments Tell Us About the Real World , 2006 .

[51]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Individual or team decision-making - Causes and consequences of self-selection , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[52]  James C. Cox,et al.  When are Women More Generous than Men , 2007 .

[53]  Abdolkarim Sadrieh,et al.  Teams Take the Better Risks , 2007 .

[54]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Are teams prone to myopic loss aversion? An experimental study on individual versus team investment behavior , 2007 .

[55]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Trust between individuals and groups: Groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy , 2007 .

[56]  Wicksell and the global economy : What drives real interest rates ? , 2007 .

[57]  Paul A. Raschky,et al.  Working Papers in Economics and Statistics Charity Hazard -a Real Hazard to Natural Disaster Insurance University of Innsbruck Working Papers in Economics and Statistics Charity Hazard -a Real Hazard to Natural Disaster Insurance? , 2022 .

[58]  Robert M. Kunst,et al.  Working Papers in Economics and Statistics an "almost-too-late" Warning Mechanism for Currency Crises an " Almost-too-late " Warning Mechanism for Currency Crises , 2022 .

[59]  Barry Sopher,et al.  Advice and behavior in intergenerational ultimatum games: An experimental approach , 2007, Games Econ. Behav..

[60]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[61]  R. Nagel,et al.  Rational Reasoning or Adaptive Behavior? Evidence from Two-Person Beauty Contest Games , 2007 .

[62]  M. Kocher,et al.  Individuals and Teams in UMTS-License Auctions , 2007 .

[63]  R. Aumann,et al.  Unraveling in Guessing Games : An Experimental Study , 2007 .

[64]  J. Cuaresma,et al.  Working Papers in Economics and Statistics , 2022 .

[65]  P. Raschky.  The overprotective parent - Bureaucratic agencies and natural hazard management , 2007 .

[66]  Boris Maciejovsky,et al.  Collective induction without cooperation? Learning and knowledge transfer in cooperative groups and competitive auctions. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  M. Kocher,et al.  Working Papers in Economics and Statistics the Impact of Naïve Advice and Observational Learning in Beauty-contest Games University of Innsbruck Working Papers in Economics and Statistics the Impact of Naïve Advice and Observational Learning in Beauty-contest Games , 2022 .

[68]  J. Cuaresma,et al.  Barriers to Technology Adoption, International R&D Spillovers and Growth , 2007 .

[69]  Patrizia Sbriglia.  Revealing the depth of reasoning in p-beauty contest games , 2004 .

[70]  S. Lang,et al.  Simultaneous probability statements for Bayesian P-splines , 2008 .

[71]  S. Gächter.  Behavioral Game Theory , 2008, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[72]  Andreas Ortmann,et al.  Comparing Guessing Games with homogeneous and heterogeneous players: Experimental results and a CH explanation , 2008 .

[73]  Todd L. Cherry,et al.  Conditional cooperation on three continents , 2008 .

[74]  Arthur Schram,et al.  The tragedy of the commons revisited: the Importance of group decision-making , 2009 .

[75]  R. Schwarze,et al.  Working Papers in Economics and Statistics Can Minimum Prices Assure the Quality of Professional Services? University of Innsbruck Working Papers in Economics and Statistics Can Minimum Prices Assure the Quality of Professional Services? , 2022 .

[76]  R. Schwarze,et al.  The Winding Road to Industrial Safety: Evidence on the Effects of Environmental Liability on Accident Prevention in Germany , 2010 .

[77]  Andrew Schotter,et al.  An Experimental Test of Advice and Social Learning , 2010, Manag. Sci..