Imperfect Symmetry and the Elementary Coordination Law

The ability to synchronize rhythmically moving limbs and limb segments is one of the most fundamental abilities of vertebrate and invertebrate movement systems. As Kelso [18] has underscored, the ability is a primary expression of how movements (a) are organized in space and time, (b) resolve issues of efficiency, and (c) meet the competing challenges of stability and flexibility. In broad theoretical terms, 1:1 frequency locking of two or more limb segments is one of biology’s original models for collective behavior — the organizing of multiple interactions among neural, muscular, metabolic, and mechanical processes under task-specific intentional constraints. Given the complexity, the task of formulating and validating quantitative mathematical models of monofrequency rhythmic coordination based on physicochemical principles, neurobiological facts, and assumptions about intentionality has proven to be extremely difficult and may well be intractable. An alternative approach, the one adopted more than two decades ago by Haken, Kelso, and Bunz [15], attempts to develop a qualitative dynamical model that incorporates, in broad strokes, the essential features of synchrony between and among the components of, in principle, any biological movement system. The model-independent approach taken by Kelso and his colleagues accords with elementary lessons from the study of complexity [11].

[1]  M. Turvey,et al.  Handedness and the asymmetric dynamics of bimanual rhythmic coordination. , 1995 .

[2]  M. Turvey,et al.  Effects of Temporal Scaling and Attention on the Asymmetrical Dynamics of Bimanual Coordination , 1997 .

[3]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[4]  J. Kelso,et al.  Symmetry breaking dynamics of human multilimb coordination. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  J. Kelso Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[6]  M. Turvey,et al.  Dynamics of bimanual rhythmic coordination in the coronal plane , 1997 .

[7]  Stephan Riek,et al.  Neuromuscular-skeletal constraints upon the dynamics of unimanual and bimanual coordination , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  J. Buchanan,et al.  Amplitude Scaling in a Bimanual Circle-Drawing Task: Pattern Switching and End-Effector Variability , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  Goldenfeld,et al.  Simple lessons from complexity , 1999, Science.

[10]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  The detuning factor in the dynamics of interlimb rhythmic coordination , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  M. Turvey,et al.  An experimental note on defining frequency competition in intersegmental coordination dynamics. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  M. Bunge Treatise on basic philosophy , 1974 .

[14]  M. Turvey,et al.  Symmetry, broken symmetry, and handedness in bimanual coordination dynamics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  M. Turvey,et al.  Dissociation of muscular and spatial constraints on patterns of interlimb coordination. , 2001 .

[16]  C Lieke E Peper,et al.  Mass Perturbation of a Body Segment: 2. Effects on Interlimb Coordination , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Extending the HKB model of coordinated movement to oscillators with different eigenfrequencies , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  R. Ball Understanding critical behaviour through visualization: A walk around the pitchfork☆ , 2001 .

[19]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  The HKB model revisited: How varying the degree of symmetry controls dynamics , 2000 .

[20]  D. Elliott,et al.  Intermittent Vision and One-Handed Catching: The Effect of General and Specific Task Experience , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  Olivier Oullier,et al.  Plane of Motion Mediates the Coalition of Constraints in Rhythmic Bimanual Coordination , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Concurrent Cognitive Task Modulates Coordination Dynamics , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  S. Swinnen Interlimb coordination : neural, dynamical, and cognitive constraints , 1994 .

[24]  M T Turvey,et al.  Breaking the reflectional symmetry of interlimb coordination dynamics. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  M. Turvey,et al.  Diffusive, Synaptic, and Synergetic Coupling: An Evaluation Through In-Phase and Antiphase Rhythmic Movements. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  M. Turvey,et al.  Coupling dynamics in interlimb coordination. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  H. Haken,et al.  A stochastic theory of phase transitions in human hand movement , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  John Guckenheimer,et al.  The Dynamics of Legged Locomotion: Models, Analyses, and Challenges , 2006, SIAM Rev..

[29]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Neural Control of Rhythmic Movements in Vertebrates , 1988 .

[30]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Dynamics of human intersegmental coordination: Theory and research , 1998 .

[31]  A. Opstal Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[32]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Motor Control and Learning , 2006 .

[33]  Daniel Bullock,et al.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation , 1988 .

[34]  N. A. Bernstein Dexterity and Its Development , 1996 .

[35]  M. Golubitsky,et al.  Singularities and groups in bifurcation theory , 1985 .

[36]  J. Kelso,et al.  Elementary Coordination Dynamics , 1994 .