Potential Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on the Planning of Definitive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Standard-of-care imaging for initial staging of prostate cancer (PCa) underestimates disease burden. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT detects PCa metastasis with superior accuracy, having a potential impact on the planning of definitive radiation therapy (RT) for nonmetastatic PCa. Our objectives were to determine how often definitive RT planning based on standard target volumes covers 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT–defined disease and to assess the potential impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on definitive RT planning. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of an intention-to-treat population of 73 patients with localized PCa without prior local therapy who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for initial staging as part of an investigational new drug trial. Eleven of the 73 were intermediate-risk (15%), 33 were high-risk (45%), 22 were very-high-risk (30%), and 7 were N1 (9.5%). Clinical target volumes (CTVs), which included the prostate, seminal vesicles, and (in accord with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus guidelines) pelvic lymph nodes (LNs), were contoured on the CT portion of the PET/CT images by a radiation oncologist masked to the PET findings. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT images were analyzed by a nuclear medicine physician. 68Ga-PSMA-11–positive lesions not covered by planning volumes based on the CTVs were considered to have a major potential impact on treatment planning. Results: All patients had one or more 68Ga-PSMA-11–positive primary prostate lesions. Twenty-five (34%) and 7 (9.5%) of the 73 patients had 68Ga-PSMA-11–positive pelvic LN and distant metastases, respectively. The sites of LN metastases in decreasing order of frequency were external iliac (20.5%), common iliac (13.5%), internal iliac (12.5%) obturator (12.5%), perirectal (4%), abdominal (4%), upper diaphragm (4%), and presacral (1.5%). The median size of the LN lesions was 6 mm (range, 4–24 mm). RT planning based on the CTVs covered 69 (94.5%) of the 73 primary lesions and 20 (80%) of the 25 pelvic LN lesions, on a per-patient analysis. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT had a major impact on intended definitive RT planning for PCa in 12 (16.5%) of the 73 patients whose RT fields covered the prostate, seminal vesicles, and pelvic LNs and in 25 (37%) of the 66 patients whose RT fields covered the prostate and seminal vesicles but not the pelvic LNs.

[1]  Matthias Eiber,et al.  68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC Uptake in Cervical, Celiac, and Sacral Ganglia as an Important Pitfall in Prostate Cancer PET Imaging , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  U. Metser,et al.  The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  A. Kishan,et al.  Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Adenocarcinoma Treated With Radiotherapy or Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-institutional Comparative Analysis. , 2017, European urology.

[4]  Sylvie Chabaud,et al.  Is there a role for pelvic irradiation in localized prostate adenocarcinoma? Preliminary results of GETUG-01. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Pawan K Gupta,et al.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Cancer Assessments: An International Multicenter Prospective Study , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Ronald C. Chen,et al.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[7]  P. Therasse,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the axial skeleton for detecting bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: diagnostic and cost-effectiveness and comparison with current detection strategies. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Ronald C. Chen,et al.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part II: Recommended Approaches and Details of Specific Care Options , 2018, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Steven P. Rowe,et al.  PSMA Ligands for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  RTOG GU Radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Charles R. Thomas,et al.  An update of the phase III trial comparing whole pelvic to prostate only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant to adjuvant total androgen suppression: updated analysis of RTOG 94-13, with emphasis on unexpected hormone/radiation interactions. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  C. Zamboglou,et al.  68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT Versus Histopathology in Primary Localized Prostate Cancer: A Voxel-Wise Comparison , 2016, Theranostics.

[14]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer: How we review and report , 2016, Cancer Imaging.

[15]  M. Parmar,et al.  Failure-Free Survival and Radiotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Data From Patients in the Control Arm of the STAMPEDE Trial. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[16]  E. Adang,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[17]  U. Haberkorn,et al.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a new technique with high potential for the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer patients , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  H. Sandler,et al.  Influence of 3D-CRT pelvic irradiation on outcome in prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  T. Eade,et al.  The Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on Management Intent in Prostate Cancer: Results of an Australian Prospective Multicenter Study , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  T. Holland-Letz,et al.  68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and Volumetric Morphology of PET-Positive Lymph Nodes Stratified by Tumor Differentiation of Prostate Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  R. Hicks,et al.  Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET: Clinical Utility in Prostate Cancer, Normal Patterns, Pearls, and Pitfalls. , 2018, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[22]  C. Belka,et al.  Detection level and pattern of positive lesions using PSMA PET/CT for staging prior to radiation therapy , 2017, Radiation Oncology.

[23]  Bernd J. Krause,et al.  68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0 , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[24]  A. Kishan,et al.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Mapping of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in 270 Patients with a PSA Level of Less Than 1.0 ng/mL: Impact on Salvage Radiotherapy Planning , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  T. Shakespeare Effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography on the decision-making of radiation oncologists , 2015, Radiation Oncology.

[26]  A. Kural,et al.  The accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in primary lymph node staging in high-risk prostate cancer , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[27]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Integration of 68Ga-PSMA-PET imaging in planning of primary definitive radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a retrospective study , 2016, Radiation Oncology.

[28]  S. Rawal,et al.  A Comparative Study of 68Gallium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymph Node Staging in High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: An Initial Experience , 2017, World journal of nuclear medicine.

[29]  F. Feng,et al.  A hormone-DNA repair circuit governs the response to genotoxic insult. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[30]  U. Haberkorn,et al.  68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. , 2012, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[31]  M. Roach,et al.  Identification of a high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer subgroup receiving maximum benefit from whole-pelvic irradiation. , 1998, The cancer journal from Scientific American.

[32]  R K Valicenti,et al.  Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  N. Nickols,et al.  The Utility of PET/CT in the Planning of External Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  H. Hieronymus,et al.  Androgen receptor signaling regulates DNA repair in prostate cancers. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[35]  Frederik L. Giesel,et al.  Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): Proposed miTNM Classification for the Interpretation of PSMA-Ligand PET/CT , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  Y. Yamada,et al.  Ten‐year outcomes of high‐dose, intensity‐modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer , 2011, Cancer.